Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in spatial learning.

Animals trained on 2 discriminations learn the 2nd rapidly if the relevant stimuli are from the same dimension as the 1st (an intradimensional or ID shift) but slowly if the relevant stimuli for the 2 problems are from different dimensions (an extradimensional or ED shift). Four experiments examined ID and ED shifts in spatial learning. Rats trained on 2 spatial problems learned the 2nd more rapidly than rats whose 1st problem had been nonspatial. But this difference between ID and ED shifts depended on the spatial relationship between rewarded (S+) and unrewarded (S-) alternatives in the 2 spatial problems. The results imply that rats trained on a spatial discrimination do not learn to attend to all spatial landmarks but only to those that serve to differentiate S+ and S-.

Role of context in perceptual learning in maze discriminations.

Three experiments with rats in a maze examined the effects of pre-exposure to the relevant discriminative stimuli (rubber- and sandpaper-covered maze arms) or the extra-maze context (the maze was surrounded either by black curtains or by variety of extra-maze landmarks) on the learning of a discrimination between rubber and sandpaper arms. In Experiment 1, pre-exposure to the extra-maze context facilitated subsequent discrimination learning. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that pre-exposure to rubber and sandpaper arms facilitated subsequent discrimination learning only when these cues were presented in the same context during pre-exposure and discriminative training. Taken together, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that a major cause of perceptual learning is the latent inhibition of stimuli or features common to the two discriminative stimuli, and that such latent inhibition may be disrupted by a radical change of context.

Perceptual learning in maze discriminations.

In Experiment 1, rats were trained on a discrimination between rubber- and sandpaper-covered arms of a maze after one group had been pre-exposed to these intra-maze cues. Pre-exposure facilitated subsequent discrimination learning, unless the discrimination was made easier by adding further discriminative stimuli, when it now significantly retarded learning. In Experiment 2, rats were trained on an extra-maze spatial discrimination, again after one group, but not another, had been pre-exposed to the extra-maze landmarks. Here too, pre-exposure facilitated subsequent discrimination learning, unless the discrimination was made substantially easier by arranging that the two arms between which rats had to choose were always separated by 135 degrees. The results of both experiments can be explained by supposing that perceptual learning depends on the presence of features common to S+ and S-.