Brain tumor surgery guided by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping for arithmetic calculation.

OBJECTIVE: The onco-functional balance represents the primary goal in neuro-oncology. The increasing use of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) allows the noninvasive characterization of cortical functional anatomy, and its reliability for motor and language mapping has previously been validated. Calculation and arithmetic processing has not been studied with nTMS so far. In this study, the authors present their preliminary data concerning nTMS calculation. METHODS: The authors designed a monocentric prospective study, adopting an internal protocol to use nTMS for preoperative planning, including arithmetic processing. When awake surgery was possible, according to the patients' conditions, nTMS points were used to guide direct cortical stimulation (DCS), i.e., the gold standard for cortical mapping. Navigated TMS-based tractography was used for surgical planning. Statistical analyses on the nTMS and DCS points were performed. RESULTS: From February 2021 to October 2023, 61 procedures for nTMS calculation mapping were performed. The clinical evaluation, including pre- and postoperative evaluations (3 months after surgery), demonstrated a good clinical outcome with preservation of arithmetic function and recovery (92.8% of patients). Between the awake and asleep surgery groups, the postoperative clinical results were comparable at the 3-month follow-up, with > 90% of the patients achieving improved calculation function. The surgical strategy adopted was aimed at sparing nTMS positive points in asleep procedures, whereas nTMS and DCS positive points were not removed in awake procedures. Overall, 62% of the positive points for calculation functions were exposed by craniotomy and 85% were spared during surgery. None of the patients developed nTMS-related seizures. Diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking based on nTMS positive points for calculation was used. The white matter fiber tracts involved in calculation functions were the arcuate fasciculus (56%) and frontal aslant tract (22%). When nTMS and DCS points were compared in awake surgery (n = 10 patients), a sensitivity of 31.71%, specificity of 85.76%, positive predictive value of 22.41%, negative predictive value of 90.64%, and accuracy of approximately 69% were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the authors' preliminary data, nTMS can be an advantageous tool to study cognitive functions, aimed at minimizing neurological impairment. The postoperative clinical outcome for patients who underwent operation with nTMS was very good. Considering these results, nTMS has proved to be a feasible method to map cognitive areas including those for calculation functions. Further analyses are needed to validate these data. Finally, other cognitive functions (e.g., visuospatial) may be explored with nTMS.

Heads-Up Micronavigation Reliability of Preoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Maps for the Motor Function: Comparison With Direct Cortical Stimulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the reliability of preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) maps for motor function as visualized intraoperatively with augmented reality heads-up display and to assess its accuracy via direct point-by-point comparison with the gold-standard direct cortical stimulation (DCS). METHODS: From January 2022 to January 2023, candidates for surgical removal of lesions involving the motor pathways underwent preoperative nTMS assessment to obtain cortical maps of motor function. Intraoperatively and before tumor removal, nTMS maps were superimposed on the cortical surface, and DCS was performed on positive points with increasing current intensity until obtaining a positive response at 16 mA. The outcome of each stimulation was recorded to obtain discrimination metrics. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled (5 females [42%] vs 7 males [58%], mean age 62.9 ± 12.8 years), for a total of 304 investigated points. Agreement between nTMS and DCS was moderate (κ = 0.43, P < .005), with 0.66 (0.53-0.78) sensitivity, 0.87 (0.82-0.90) specificity, 0.50 (0.39-0.62) positive predictive values, 0.93 (0.89-0.95) negative predictive value, and 0.83 (0.79-0.87) accuracy. A loss of accuracy was observed with higher DCS current intensities. CONCLUSION: We performed a point-by-point validation of preoperative nTMS maps for motor function using augmented reality visualization. The high negative predictive value and low positive predictive values highlight nTMS reliability to visualize safe cortical zones but not to identify critical functional areas, confirming previous findings of nTMS maps for the language function and suggesting the need for combined use of nTMS maps and DCS for optimal maximal safe resection.

Feasibility of Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potential Monitoring by Cortical Strip Electrodes in Patients During Brain Surgery: A Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVE: The role of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) monitoring during neurosurgical procedure in patient remains unclear. The purpose of our study was to determine the feasibility of intraoperative VEP recording using a strip cortical electrode during surgical resection of intracranial lesions. METHODS: In this prospective, monocentric, observational study, we enrolled consecutive patients undergoing neurosurgical procedure for intracranial lesions. After dural opening, a cortical strip was positioned on the lateral occipital surface. Flash VEPs were continuously recorded using both subdermal corkscrew electrodes and strip electrodes. An electroretinogram was also recorded to guarantee delivery of adequate flash stimuli to the retina. RESULTS: We included 10 patients affected by different intracranial lesions. Flash VEPs were recorded using subdermal corkscrew electrodes in all patients except 1 in whom they were never identified during the recording. Flash VEPs were recorded using strip electrodes in all patients and showed a polyphasic morphology with a significantly larger amplitude compared with that of flash VEPs measured using subdermal corkscrew electrodes. No patient reported worsened postoperative vision and a >50% decrease in the VEPs amplitude was never registered. CONCLUSIONS: We have reported for the first time in the literature that VEP monitoring during a neurosurgical procedure is feasible via a cortical strip located on the occipital surface. The technique demonstrated greater stability and a larger amplitude compared with recordings with scalp electrodes, facilitating identification of any changes. Studies with more patients are needed to assess the clinical reliability of the technique.

Electrodiagnostic findings in patients with non-COVID-19- and COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy (CIPNM) is a frequent neurological manifestation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. CIPNM diagnosis is usually limited to clinical evaluation. We compared patients with ARDS from COVID-19 and other aetiologies, in whom a neurophysiological evaluation for the detection of CIPNM was performed. The aim was to determine if there were any differences between these two groups in frequency of CINPM and outcome at discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study performed on mechanically ventilated patients consecutively admitted (January 2016-June 2020) to the ICU of Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy, with ARDS of different aetiologies. Neurophysiological evaluation was performed on patients with stable ventilation parameters, but marked widespread hyposthenia (Medical Research Council score <48). Creatine phosphokinase (CPK), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) and mean morning glycaemic values were collected. RESULTS: From a total of 148 patients, 23 with COVID-19 infection and 21 with ARDS due to other aetiologies, underwent electroneurography/electromyography (ENG/EMG) recording. Incidence of CIPNM was similar in the two groups, 65% (15 of 23) in COVID-19 patients and 71% (15 of 21) in patients affected by ARDS of other aetiologies. At ICU discharge, subjects with CIPNM more frequently required ventilatory support, regardless the aetiology of ARDS. CONCLUSION: ENG/EMG represents a useful tool in the identification of the neuromuscular causes underlying ventilator wean failure and patient stratification. A high incidence of CIPNM, with a similar percentage, has been observed in ARDS patients of all aetiologies.