Therapeutic plasma exchange in children: One center's experience.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has evolved to an accepted therapy for selected indications. However, it is technically challenging in children. Moreover, data on safety and efficacy are mainly derived from adult series. The aim of this study was to review the procedure in the context of clinical indications, effectiveness, and safety. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All TPE procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital during a 12-year period (2005-2016) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with a median age of 8.5 (0.2-17) years underwent a total of 280 TPE sessions. Eleven (61%) patients were treated for renal diseases. Three (17%) patients were diagnosed with neurological diseases, two had liver failure, and one patient each had sepsis and stem cell transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Seven patients (39%) were classified as American Society for Apheresis Category I, four (22%) as Category II, two (13%) each as Category III and IV, and two (13%) were not classified. Two patients with atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome received TPE as long-term therapy over 2 and 5 years. All procedures were performed using the filtration technique and heparin anticoagulation. Twelve (67%) patients showed full or partial recovery after TPE, six had no response or an uncertain response. Minor adverse events occurred in 30/280 (10.6%) procedures, and one major complication (0.4%) was reported. CONCLUSION: TPE is a safe apheresis method in children, even when performed as a long-term therapy. Efficacy is high under selected conditions. A highly skilled and experienced staff is mandatory to ensure patient safety and efficacy.

De novo tacrolimus-induced thrombotic microangiopathy in the early stage after renal transplantation successfully treated with conversion to everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare complication after renal transplantation. It may be difficult to distinguish from CNI toxicity and acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Its clinical presentation may vary from isolated localised forms up to catastrophic systemic presentations. CASE: We report a case of tacrolimus-induced TMA soon after renal transplantation in an 11-year-old boy who received his second renal transplantation. His first graft was lost because of AMR. On day 12 after his second renal transplantation, his renal function started worsening and a kidney biopsy was performed, which showed histopathological signs of TMA. The diagnosis of tacrolimus-induced TMA was established after excluding AMR and other causes of de novo TMA. Genetic complement investigation disclosed two complement factor H risk polymorphisms as possible modifiers of TMA emergence. Treatment was based on replacing tacrolimus with everolimus, with a subsequent normalisation of renal function. CONCLUSION: A prompt diagnosis of de novo TMA by early allograft biopsy is essential for the allograft outcome and genetic investigations for possible complement abnormalities are reasonable, not only for patients with a systemic aspect of their post-transplant TMA. Replacing tacrolimus with everolimus effectively controlled the TMA and stabilised renal function in our patient.