Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Pain Res Manag ; 2017: 8123812, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28280406

RESUMO

The Quebec Pain Registry (QPR) is a large research database of patients suffering from various chronic pain (CP) syndromes who were referred to one of five tertiary care centres in the province of Quebec (Canada). Patients were monitored using common demographics, identical clinical descriptors, and uniform validated outcomes. This paper describes the development, implementation, and research potential of the QPR. Between 2008 and 2013, 6902 patients were enrolled in the QPR, and data were collected prior to their first visit at the pain clinic and six months later. More than 90% of them (mean age ± SD: 52.76 ± 4.60, females: 59.1%) consented that their QPR data be used for research purposes. The results suggest that, compared to patients with serious chronic medical disorders, CP patients referred to tertiary care clinics are more severely impaired in multiple domains including emotional and physical functioning. The QPR is also a powerful and comprehensive tool for conducting research in a "real-world" context with 27 observational studies and satellite research projects which have been completed or are underway. It contains data on the clinical evolution of thousands of patients and provides the opportunity of answering important research questions on various aspects of CP (or specific pain syndromes) and its management.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Dor Crônica/terapia , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Clínicas de Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Idoso , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Feminino , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/métodos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/normas , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
2.
N Engl J Med ; 336(23): 1634-40, 1997 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9171065

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although epidural corticosteroid injections are commonly used for sciatica, their efficacy has not been established. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we administered up to three epidural injections of methylprednisolone acetate (80 mg in 8 ml of isotonic saline) or isotonic saline (1 ml) to 158 patients with sciatica due to a herniated nucleus pulposus. All patients had Oswestry disability scores higher than 20 (on a scale of 1 to 100, with scores of 20 or less indicating minimal disability, and higher scores greater disability). RESULTS: At three weeks, the Oswestry score had improved by a mean of -8.0 in the methylprednisolone group and -5.5 in the placebo group (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -7.1 to 2.2). Differences in improvements between the groups were not significant, except for improvements in the finger-to-floor distance (P=0.006) and sensory deficits (P=0.03), which were greater in the methylprednisolone group. After six weeks, the only significant difference was the improvement in leg pain, which was greater in the methylprednisolone group (P=0.03). After three months, there were no significant differences between the groups. The Oswestry score had improved by a mean of -17.3 in the methylprednisolone group and -15.4 in the placebo group (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -9.3 to 5.4). At 12 months, the cumulative probability of back surgery was 25.8 percent in the methylprednisolone group and 24.8 percent in the placebo group (P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Although epidural injections of methylprednisolone may afford short-term improvement in leg pain and sensory deficits in patients with sciatica due to a herniated nucleus pulposus, this treatment offers no significant functional benefit, nor does it reduce the need for surgery.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/complicações , Metilprednisolona/análogos & derivados , Ciática/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Epidurais/efeitos adversos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Acetato de Metilprednisolona , Ciática/etiologia , Ciática/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; (304): 22-4, 1994 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8020220

RESUMO

A prospective randomized study undertaken in 30 patients who underwent outpatient decompressive acromioplasty demonstrated the efficacy and safety of interscalene block post-operatively. Interscalene block improved the postoperative condition and well being of these patients. Their use decreased the hospitalization rate. There were no complications or side effects.


Assuntos
Acrômio/cirurgia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
N Engl J Med ; 325(14): 1002-7, 1991 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1832209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is a common problem with many treatments, few of which have been rigorously evaluated. This randomized, placebo-controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of injections of corticosteroid into facet joints to treat chronic low back pain. METHODS: Patients with chronic low back pain who reported immediate relief of their pain after injections of local anesthetic into the facet joints between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae and the fifth lumbar and first sacral vertebrae were randomly assigned to receive under fluoroscopic guidance injections of either methylprednisolone acetate (20 mg; n = 49) or isotonic saline (n = 48) in the same facet joints. Ninety-five patients were followed for six months and their condition assessed with scales of pain severity, back mobility, and limitation of function. RESULTS: After one month, none of the outcome measures evaluating pain, functional status, and back flexion differed clinically or statistically between the two study groups. Forty-two percent of the patients who received methylprednisolone and 33 percent of those who received placebo reported marked or very marked improvement (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -11 to 28 percentage points; P = 0.53). The results were similar after three months. At the six-month evaluation, the patients treated with methylprednisolone reported more improvement, less pain on the visual-analogue scale, and less physical disability. The differences were reduced, however, when concurrent interventions were taken into account. Moreover, only 11 patients (22 percent) in the methylprednisolone group and 5 (10 percent) in the placebo group had sustained improvement from the first month to the sixth month (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -2 to 26; P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that injecting methylprednisolone acetate into the facet joints is of little value in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Dor nas Costas/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Vértebras Lombares , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...