Sleep, physical activity and panic attacks: A two-year prospective cohort study using smartwatches, deep learning and an explainable artificial intelligence model.

BACKGROUND: Sleep and physical activity suggestions for panic disorder (PD) are critical but less surveyed. This two-year prospective cohort study aims to predict panic attacks (PA), state anxiety (SA), trait anxiety (TA) and panic disorder severity (PDS) in the upcoming week. METHODS: We enrolled 114 PD patients from one general hospital. Data were collected using the DSM-5, the MINI, clinical app questionnaires (BDI, BAI, PDSS-SR, STAI) and wearable devices recording daily sleep, physical activity and heart rate from 16 June 2020 to 10 June 2022. Our teams applied RNN, LSTM, GRU deep learning and SHAP explainable methods to analyse the data. RESULTS: The 7-day prediction accuracies for PA, SA, TA, and PDS were 92.8 %, 83.6 %, 87.2 %, and 75.6 % from the LSTM model. Using the SHAP explainable model, higher initial BDI or BAI score and comorbidities with depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder or agoraphobia predict a higher chance of PA. However, PA decreased under the following conditions: daily average heart rate, 72-87 bpm; maximum heart rate, 100-145 bpm; resting heart rate, 55-60 bpm; daily climbing of more than nine floors; total sleep duration between 6 h 23 min and 10 h 50 min; deep sleep, >50 min; and awake duration, <53 min. LIMITATIONS: Moderate sample size and self-report questionnaires were the limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning predicts recurrent PA and various anxiety domains with 75.6-92.8 % accuracy. Recurrent PA decreases under adequate daily sleep and physical activity.

Enhancing panic disorder treatment with mobile-aided case management: an exploratory study based on a 3-year cohort analysis.

Background: Individuals with panic disorder frequently face ongoing symptoms, suboptimal treatment adherence, and increased relapse rates. Although mobile health interventions have shown promise in improving treatment outcomes for numerous mental health conditions, their effectiveness, specifically for panic disorder, has yet to be determined. Objective: This study investigates the effects of a mobile-aided case management program on symptom reduction and quality of care among individuals with panic disorder. Methods: This 3-year cohort study enrolled 138 participants diagnosed with panic disorder. One hundred and eight participants joined the mobile-aided case management group and 30 in the treatment-as-usual group. Data were collected at baseline, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month treatment checkpoints using self-report questionnaires, in-depth interviews, direct observation, and medical record analysis. Results: During the maintenance treatment phase, the mobile-assisted case management group decreased both panic severity (p = 0.008) and state anxiety (p = 0.016) more than the control group at 6 months. Participants who underwent case management experienced enhanced control over panic symptoms, heightened self-awareness, and elevated interpersonal support. Conclusion: The mobile-aided case management is beneficial in managing panic disorder, especially maintenance treatment.

Panic Attack Prediction Using Wearable Devices and Machine Learning: Development and Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: A panic attack (PA) is an intense form of anxiety accompanied by multiple somatic presentations, leading to frequent emergency department visits and impairing the quality of life. A prediction model for PAs could help clinicians and patients monitor, control, and carry out early intervention for recurrent PAs, enabling more personalized treatment for panic disorder (PD). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide a 7-day PA prediction model and determine the relationship between a future PA and various features, including physiological factors, anxiety and depressive factors, and the air quality index (AQI). METHODS: We enrolled 59 participants with PD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview). Participants used smartwatches (Garmin Vívosmart 4) and mobile apps to collect their sleep, heart rate (HR), activity level, anxiety, and depression scores (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI], Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI], State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state anxiety [STAI-S], State-Trait Anxiety Inventory trait anxiety [STAI-T], and Panic Disorder Severity Scale Self-Report) in their real life for a duration of 1 year. We also included AQIs from open data. To analyze these data, our team used 6 machine learning methods: random forests, decision trees, linear discriminant analysis, adaptive boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and regularized greedy forests. RESULTS: For 7-day PA predictions, the random forest produced the best prediction rate. Overall, the accuracy of the test set was 67.4%-81.3% for different machine learning algorithms. The most critical variables in the model were questionnaire and physiological features, such as the BAI, BDI, STAI, MINI, average HR, resting HR, and deep sleep duration. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to predict PAs using a combination of data from questionnaires and physiological and environmental data.