Ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy versus monotherapy for treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy with that of monotherapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB). METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until September 1, 2023. Only studies that compared CZA combination therapy with monotherapy for CR-GNB infections were included. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies (23 retrospective observational studies and 2 prospective studies) involving 2676 patients were included. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the study group receiving combination therapy and the control group receiving monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.18). In addition, no significant differences were observed between the study and the control group in terms of in-hospital mortality (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.79-1.27), 14-day mortality (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.24-9.91), 90-day mortality (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.62-2.22), and clinical cure rate (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84-1.08). However, the combination group had a borderline higher microbiological eradication rate than the control group (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to monotherapy, CZA combination therapy did not yield additional clinical benefits. However, combination therapy may be associated with favorable microbiological outcomes.

Diagnostic efficacy of the triglyceride-glucose index in the prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Introduction: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Identifying patients at high CIN risk remains challenging. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index may help predict CIN but evidence is limited. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of TyG index for CIN after PCI. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE until August 2023 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023452257). Observational studies examining TyG index for predicting CIN risk in PCI patients were included. This diagnostic meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the TyG index in predicting the likelihood of CIN. Secondary outcomes aimed to assess the pooled incidence of CIN and the association between an elevated TyG index and the risk of CIN. Results: Five studies (Turkey, n=2; China, n=3) with 3518 patients (age range: 57.6 to 68.22 years) were included. The pooled incidence of CIN was 15.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11-20.8%]. A high TyG index associated with increased CIN risk (odds ratio: 2.25, 95% CI 1.82-2.77). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.59-0.88) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.43-0.68) respectively. Analysis of the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve revealed an area under the curve of 0.69 (95% CI 0.65-0.73). There was a low risk of publication bias (p = 0.81). Conclusion: The TyG index displayed a noteworthy correlation with the risk of CIN subsequent to PCI. However, its overall diagnostic accuracy was found to be moderate in nature. While promising, the TyG index should not be used in isolation for CIN screening given the heterogeneity between studies. In addition, the findings cannot be considered conclusive given the scarcity of data. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate TyG cutoffs and determine how to optimally incorporate it into current risk prediction models. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023452257, identifier CRD42023452257.

Efficacy of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a prevalent malignancy with a poor prognosis, necessitating the identification of prognostic biomarkers to guide management. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), calculated from serum albumin and body weight, may predict survival in patients with HNC. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify this relationship. Databases were searched for studies examining the association between pretreatment GNRI and overall survival in patients with HNC. Ten studies with 2793 patients were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that low GNRI was associated with significantly worse overall survival compared to high GNRI (hazard ratio [HR]:2.84, 95% CI 2.07-3.91, p < 0.00001). Older age (HR:1.73; 95% CI, 1.35-2.22; p < 0.0001), male sex (HR:1.7; 95% CI, 1.12-2.6; p = 0.01), advanced tumor stage (HR: 2.5; 95% CI, 1.72-3.63; p < 0.00001), and higher T-/N-stage (HR = 1.69 and 1.98, respectively) were also predictive of unfavorable outcomes. The GNRI had the highest HR, suggesting potent predictive ability. Despite limitations, including retrospective design and potential publication bias, our study indicates that low pretreatment GNRI predicts poor overall survival in patients with HNC. The GNRI is an inexpensive, routinely available biomarker that could improve prognostication and guide management decisions. Additional research is warranted to validate these findings.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Carotid Ultrasound for Predicting the Risk of Perioperative Hypotension or Fluid Responsiveness: A Meta-Analysis.

Despite the acceptance of carotid ultrasound for predicting patients' fluid responsiveness in critical care and anesthesia, its efficacy for predicting hypotension and fluid responsiveness remains unclear in the perioperative setting. Electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2023 to identify observational studies focusing on the use of corrected blood flow time (FTc) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak) for assessing the risks of hypotension and fluid responsiveness. Using FTc as a predictive tool (four studies), the analysis yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.89) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.97) for the risk of hypotension (area under curve (AUC): 0.95). For fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity and specificity of FTc were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.84) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.86), respectively (AUC: 0.87). In contrast, the use of ΔVpeak to predict the risk of fluid responsiveness showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85) and specificity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.8) (AUC: 0.79). The current meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting the high diagnostic accuracy of FTc in predicting perioperative hypotension and fluid responsiveness, which requires further studies for verification.

Clinical efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics for complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). METHODS: Three electronic databases (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception until 20 October 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics (novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones and cefiderocol) against cUTIs. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate (CCR) at test of cure (TOC), while secondary outcomes included CCR at end of treatment (EOT), microbiological eradication rate, and the risk of adverse events (AEs). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to examine the evidence. RESULTS: In total, 11 RCTs demonstrated a higher CCR [83.6% vs 80.3%, odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.74, P=0.01, I2=35%, 11 RCTs, 3514 participants] and microbiological eradication rate (77.7% vs 67.2%, OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.46-2.20, P<0.00001, 11 RCTs, 4347 participants) at TOC in the intervention group compared with the control group. At EOT, there was no significant difference in CCR (OR 0.96, P=0.81, I2=4%, nine RCTs, 3429 participants) or risk of treatment-emergent AEs (OR 0.95, P=0.57, I2=51%, 11 RCTs, 5790 participants) between the intervention and control groups. TSA showed robust evidence regarding microbiological eradication rate and treatment-emergent AEs, while the CCR at TOC and EOT remained inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: While showing similar safety, the investigated novel antibiotics may be more effective than the conventional antibiotics for patients with cUTIs. However, as the pooled evidence relating to CCR remained inconclusive, further studies are required to address this issue.

Diagnostic efficacy of sonographic measurement of laryngeal air column width difference for predicting the risk of post-extubation stridor: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Background: This meta-analysis aimed at assessing the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-measured laryngeal air column width difference (ACWD) in predicting post-extubation stridor (PES) in intubated adult patients. Methods: We searched the Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google scholar databases from inception to October, 2022 to identify studies that examined the diagnostic accuracy of ACWD for PES. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance by calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). The secondary outcomes were the differences in ACWD and duration of intubation between patients with and without PES. Results: Following literature search, 11 prospective studies (intensive care setting, n = 10; operating room setting, n = 1) involving 1,322 extubations were included. The incidence of PES among the studies was 4-25%. All studies were mixed-gender (females: 24.1-68.5%) with sample sizes ranging between 41 and 432. The cut-off values of ACWD for prediction of PES varied from 0.45 to 1.6 mm. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ACWD for PES were 0.8 (95% CI = 0.69-0.88, I 2: 37.26%, eight studies) and 0.81 (95% CI = 0.72-0.88, I 2: 89.51%, eight studies), respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.87 (95% CI = 0.84-0.90). Patients with PES had a smaller ACWD compared to those without PES (mean difference = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.79 to -0.28, I 2: 97%, eight studies). Moreover, patients with PES had a longer duration of tracheal intubation than that in those without (mean difference = 2.75 days, 95% CI = 0.92, 4.57, I 2: 90%, seven studies). Conclusion: Ultrasound-measured laryngeal ACWD showed satisfactory sensitivity and specificity for predicting PES. Because of the limited number of studies available, further investigations are needed to support our findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022375772.

Efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of apathy in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

RATIONALE: Despite the reported efficacy of methylphenidate (MET) against Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated apathy, a recent larger clinical trial was not included in pooled analysis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at investigating the efficacy of MET for attenuating apathy in patients diagnosed with AD. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception until March, 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was apathy improvement assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) apathy subscale, Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), or Clinical Global Impressions of Change scale (CGI-C apathy). RESULTS: Meta-analysis of four RCTs revealed an improvement in apathy among patients receiving MET compared to placebo (MD = - 5.12, p = 0.04, three trials, 144 participants) at follow-ups of 1-3 months assessed with AES score. Despite the absence of improvement on NPI-apathy subscale at follow-ups of 1-2 months (MD = - 0.74, p = 0.37, three trials, 265 participants), significant improvement was noted at follow-ups of 6 months (MD = - 1.4, p = 0.02, one trial, 180 participants). Assessment with CGI-C apathy revealed no significant association between improvement in apathy with MET use (RR = 1.38, p = 0.05, three trials, 265 participants). No significant differences in global cognitive function (using the Mini Mental State Exam) or adverse events were noted between the two groups. CONCLUSION: While AES score suggested an early attenuation effect of MET on apathy in different domains, the NPI-apathy subscale did not show early improvement in apathy until the 6-month follow-up. Further studies with longer follow-ups are needed to elucidate the efficacy of MET for relieving caregiver burden and improving global functional performance.

Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on the risk of adverse events in the older patients receiving anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: to assess the efficacy of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for preventing treatment-related toxicity in older people undergoing non-surgical cancer therapies. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases were searched from inception till January 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the incidence of toxicity measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (primary outcome) and that of therapeutic modifications, early treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival, overall survival and hospitalisation (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: analysis of six RCTs published from 2016 to 2021 recruiting 2,126 participants (median age: 71-77) who received chemotherapy as the major therapeutic approach revealed 51.7% and 64.7% of Grade 3+ toxicity in the CGA and control (i.e. standard care) groups, respectively (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.7-0.94, P = 0.005, I2 = 65%, certainty of evidence [COE]: moderate). There were no significant differences in the incidence of early treatment discontinuation (RR = 0.88, P = 0.47; I2 = 63%,1,408 participants, COE: low), initial reduction in treatment intensity (RR = 0.99, P = 0.94; I2 = 83%, 2055 participants, COE: low), treatment delay (RR = 1.06, P = 0.77, I2 = 0%, 309 participants, COE: moderate), hospitalisation (RR = 0.86, P = 0.39, I2 = 41%, 914 participants, COE: moderate), progression-free and overall survival with or without CGA. However, there was an association between CGA and a lower incidence of dose reduction during treatment (RR = 0.73, P < 0.00001, 956 participants, COE: moderate). CONCLUSIONS: our results demonstrated that comprehensive geriatric assessment may be associated with a lower incidence of treatment-related toxicity and dose reduction compared to standard care in older people receiving non-surgical cancer treatments. Further large-scale studies are warranted to support our findings.