Outcomes Following Surgery for Distal Rectal Cancers: A Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Abdomino-Perineal Resection.

PURPOSE: Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (APR) for distal rectal cancer are infrequently reported. This study aims to compare the long term outcomes between laparoscopic and open APR in distal rectal cancers. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent APR for distal rectal cancer from May 2001 to November 2009 was performed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients, median age 60 (24 - 86) years, formed the study group. Laparoscopic resection was attempted in 16 patients and was successful in all but one. Patients with recurrent diseases, previous abdominal operations and neoadjuvant chemoradiation were more likely to undergo open APR. There were no differences in the T-staging, number of lymph nodes harvested or the final stage of the disease between the two groups. The laparoscopic APR group had a shorter median length of hospitalization (7 vs. 10 days, p < 0.05), but longer operative duration (300 vs. 240 minutes, p > 0.05). Excluding the 9 (21.4%) patients with metastatic disease on presentation, 13 (39.4%) developed recurrence after a median follow up of 24 (4 - 107) months. Twenty (47.6%) patients died from their advanced disease subsequently while one (2.4%) died from a noncancer related cause. Analysis showed that tumour stage and circumferential resection margin positivity were associated with a poorer survival. The types of approach had no significant impact on the survival. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic APR for distal rectal cancer yields similar oncologic outcomes as open APR. Long-term outcome is determined by the tumour stage and circumferential resection margin and not the approach.

Identification of the internal anal opening and seton placement improves the outcome of deep postanal space abscess.

AIM: This study aimed to determine if successful seton placement at the initial drainage procedure improves outcomes in the management of deep postanal space abscesses. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent initial drainage of a DPA space abscess between December 2002 and August 2010. A seton was placed through the internal opening if it could be identified. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients of median age 41 (21-64) years formed the study group. Twenty-four (75.0%) had a seton inserted at the initial drainage procedure. The patients underwent a total of 56 operations. The median interval from the initial to the final operation was 5 (2-18) months with 17 (70.8%) patients having the final operation within 6 months. In the 8 (25.0%) patients whose internal opening could not be found, 26 operations were required with a median interval from the initial to the final surgery of 11 (3-24) months. Patients who had a seton successfully inserted at drainage underwent significantly earlier definitive surgery and required fewer operations (P < 0.038). CONCLUSION: Identification of an internal opening with placement of a seton at the initial drainage procedure is associated with earlier definitive surgery and fewer operations.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection utilizing the planned end colostomy site.

BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing the planned end colostomy site for placing the hand-assist device in performing hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections (HAL APR) in patients with low rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with low rectal cancers not suitable for a sphincter salvage proctectomy were recruited. HAL APR was performed by placing the hand-assist device over the planned colostomy site. Standard total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed, and the specimen was delivered via the perineal incision. Patient data and perioperative variables were obtained from the institution colorectal cancer database and analyzed. RESULTS: Six patients underwent HAL APR from November 2004 to January 2006. Mean operative time was 213 min with no conversions or intraoperative complications. One patient developed post-operative ileus which resolved spontaneously. There were no other morbidities or mortalities. Mean hospitalization was 6.8 days. After a mean follow-up of 13.3 months, one patient developed a parastomal hernia which was subsequently repaired during liver resection for liver metastases. No other long-term complications occurred. CONCLUSION: HAL APR with the hand device placed at the planned stoma site is technically feasible. Without creating an additional incision, the operation is oncologically comparable and renders similar short-term outcomes as SL methods, maintaining the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy versus standard laparoscopic colectomy: a cost analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is a relative dearth of literature comparing hand-assisted (HALC) to standard (SLC) laparoscopic colectomies. HALC seems beneficial in terms of shorter operative times and lower conversion rates, but this is counterbalanced by a greater inflammatory response, larger incisions and higher direct costs. Nevertheless, these results are not consistent throughout existing studies and there are to date no detailed cost comparisons. Our hypothesis was that HALC would not incur significantly higher institutional costs compared with standard laparoscopic techniques. METHOD: Patients undergoing either SLC or HALC between August 2004 and September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were managed using a standard protocol. Outcomes assessed included operative times, conversion rates, pain scores, time to resolution of ileus, length of stay and complications. Total costs were calculated from the day of surgery. Statistical analyses included chi(2), Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U-test or nonparametric bootstrapping method. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients underwent SLC while 101 had HALC. Demographics and indications for surgery in both groups were similar; the majority were performed for colorectal cancers. Operative times were shorter (147.5 vs 172.5 min, P < 0.05) and complication rates lower (28.7%vs 45.2%, P < 0.025) for HALC. There was no significant difference in the other clinical outcomes. Operative costs and cost of consumables were higher for HALC (US$4024.2 vs US$3568.1, P = 0.01 and US$1724.7 vs US$1302.7, P < 0.001, respectively). However, total costs were not significantly different (HALC US$8999.8, SLC US$7910.7, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Institutional costs are not significantly higher for HALC compared with SLC.

Massive bleeding from a Dieulafoy-like lesion of the rectum in a burns patient.

Gastrointestinal haemorrhage is a rare but well-recognised complication of extensive burns, the site of haemorrhage usually being in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The case of an 18-year old female patient who developed sudden massive rectal bleeding 1 month after suffering 45% body surface area burns is presented. The source of the haemorrhage was a Dieulafoy-type lesion at the anorectal junction associated with mucosal ulceration, a cause of bleeding not previously described in a patient with major burns. Angiographic embolisation failed to control the haemorrhage and surgical arrest was required, following which the patient made a complete recovery with no recurrence of bleeding. Haemorrhage from the lower gastrointestinal tract is rarely associated with major burns but may be significant when it occurs. The aetiology is unclear but sepsis, mucosal ischaemia and ulceration may be implicated.

Postoperative intra-abdominal free gas after open colorectal resection.

PURPOSE: An erect chest radiograph for subdiaphragmatic free gas can be a useful adjunct in detecting a defect in gastrointestinal continuity. The usefulness of this test after laparotomy has not been defined, because the period of persistence of free gas is unknown. We set out to determine the length of time for natural absorption of postlaparotomy pneumoperitoneum in a prospective cohort study. METHOD: Plain erect chest radiographs were performed on the second and fourth postoperative day and daily thereafter until the disappearance of subdiaphragmatic free gas after laparotomy. RESULTS: Seventy-five consecutive patients were studied after informed consent. The mean age was 62.1 (standard error of the mean, 1.7) years. On the fifth postoperative day, sixth postoperative day, and seventh postoperative day, 71.6, 80, and 89 percent of patients, respectively, had no visible subdiaphragmatic gas. Five patients had gas persisting beyond the tenth postoperative day. Two of these patients did not have an anastomosis. The use of drainage tubes did not affect significantly the mean time to disappearance of subdiaphragmatic free gas (4.5 vs. 4.9 days; P = 0.45: t-test). The duration of surgery, body mass index, and time to resume bowel function had no significant effect on gas disappearance. Two patients had a clinical leak on the fifth postoperative day. This was manifested as an increase in the collection of subdiaphragmatic gas during the course of a day. CONCLUSION: By the sixth postoperative day 80 percent of patients had no subdiaphragmatic free gas on an erect chest radiograph regardless of the presence of a drainage tube. The erect chest radiograph may therefore be a simple and readily available adjunct in the evaluation of postoperative abdominal pain, especially after the sixth postoperative day when a similar prior examination is done routinely on the fourth postoperative day for comparison.

Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results.

UNLABELLED: Optional treatment for complete rectal prolapse remains controversial. PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience over a 19-year period to assess trends in choice of operation, recurrence rates, and functional results. METHODS: We identified 372 patients who underwent surgery for complete rectal prolapse between 1976 and 1994. Charts were reviewed and follow-up (median, 64: range, 12-231 months) was obtained by mailed questionnaire (149 patients; 40 percent) and telephone interview (35 patients; 9 percent). Functional results were obtained from 184 responders (49 percent). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 64 (11-100) years, and females outnumbered males by nine to one. One-hundred and eighty-eight patients (51 percent) were lost to follow-up; 183 patients (49 percent) underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy, and 161 patients (43 percent) underwent abdominal rectopexy with bowel resection. The percentage of patients who underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy increased from 22 percent in the first five years of the study to 79 percent in the most recent five years. Patients undergoing perineal rectosigmoidectomy were more likely to have associated medical problems as compared with patients undergoing abdominal rectopexy (61 vs. 30 percent, P = 0.00001). There was no significant difference in morbidity, with 14 percent for perineal rectosigmoidectomy vs. 20 percent for abdominal rectopexy. Abdominal procedures were associated with a longer length of stay as compared with perineal rectosigmoidectomy (8 vs. 5 days, P = 0.001). Perineal procedures, however, had a higher recurrence rate (16 vs. 5 percent, P = 0.002). Functional improvement was not significantly different, and most patients were satisfied with treatment and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that abdominal rectopexy with bowel resection is associated with low recurrence rates. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy provides lower morbidity and shorter length of stay, but recurrence rates are much higher. Despite this, perineal rectosigmoidectomy has appeal as a lesser procedure for elderly patients or those patients in the high surgical risk category. For younger patients, the benefits of perineal rectosigmoidectomy being a lesser procedure must be weighed against a higher recurrence rate.Patient satisfaction]

Anal sphincter integrity and function influences outcome in rectovaginal fistula repair.

PURPOSE: Traumatic sphincter disruption frequently is associated with a rectovaginal fistula, but the effect of a persistent sphincter defect on the outcome of rectovaginal fistula repair is poorly documented. We analyzed the outcome of rectovaginal fistula repairs based on preoperative sphincter status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 52 women who underwent 62 repairs of simple obstetrical rectovaginal fistulas between 1992 and 1995. Fourteen patients (27 percent) had preoperative endoanal ultrasound studies and 25 (48 percent) had anal manometry studies. Follow-up was by mailed questionnaire in 36 patients (69 percent) and by telephone interview in 12 (23 percent), for a total response rate of 92 percent. Median age was 30.5 (range, 18-70) years, and median follow-up was 15 (range, 0.5-123) months. Twenty-five patients (48 percent) complained of varying degrees of fecal incontinence before surgery. There were 27 endorectal advancement flaps and 35 sphincteroplasties (28 with and 8 without levatoroplasty). RESULTS: Success rates were 41 percent with endorectal advancement flaps and 80 percent with sphincteroplasties (96 percent success with and 33 percent without levatoroplasty; P = 0.0001). Endorectal advancement flap was successful in 50 percent of patients with normal sphincter function but in only 33 percent of patients with abnormal sphincter function (P = not significant). For sphincteroplasties, success rates were 73 vs. 84 percent for normal and abnormal sphincter function, respectively (P = not significant). Results were better after sphincteroplasties vs. endorectal advancement flaps in patients with sphincter defects identified by endoanal ultrasound (88 vs. 33 percent; P = not significant) and by manometry (86 vs. 33 percent; P = not significant). Poor results correlated with prior surgery in patients undergoing endorectal advancement flaps (45 percent vs. 25 percent; P = not significant) but not sphincteroplasties (80 vs. 75 percent; P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: All patients with rectovaginal fistula should undergo preoperative evaluation for occult sphincter defects by endoanal ultrasound or anal manometry or both procedures. Local tissues are inadequate for endorectal advancement flap repairs in patients with sphincter defects and a history of previous repairs. Patients with clinical or anatomic sphincter defects should be treated by sphincteroplasty with levatoroplasty.

Rectovaginal fistulas. Therapeutic options.

The management of RVF depends on size, location, and cause; anal sphincter function and overall health status of the patient; and the skill and judgment of the surgeon. Careful preoperative assessment of the fistula, surrounding tissues, and anal sphincter and exclusion of associated disease are essential. With thorough evaluation, thoughtful consideration of treatment options, and meticulous operative technique, patients can be assured of an optimal outcome. Success in treatment of patients with RVF should be measured not just in terms of successful closure of the fistula but also in terms of patient satisfaction with postoperative anal continence.