Large language models' responses to liver cancer surveillance, diagnosis, and management questions: accuracy, reliability, readability.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy, reliability, and readability of publicly available large language models in answering fundamental questions on hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and management. METHODS: Twenty questions on liver cancer diagnosis and management were asked in triplicate to ChatGPT-3.5 (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Bing (Microsoft). Responses were assessed by six fellowship-trained physicians from three academic liver transplant centers who actively diagnose and/or treat liver cancer. Responses were categorized as accurate (score 1; all information is true and relevant), inadequate (score 0; all information is true, but does not fully answer the question or provides irrelevant information), or inaccurate (score - 1; any information is false). Means with standard deviations were recorded. Responses were considered as a whole accurate if mean score was > 0 and reliable if mean score was > 0 across all responses for the single question. Responses were also quantified for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease Score and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Readability and accuracy across 60 responses were compared using one-way ANOVAs with Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Of the twenty questions, ChatGPT answered nine (45%), Gemini answered 12 (60%), and Bing answered six (30%) questions accurately; however, only six (30%), eight (40%), and three (15%), respectively, were both accurate and reliable. There were no significant differences in accuracy between any chatbot. ChatGPT responses were the least readable (mean Flesch Reading Ease Score 29; college graduate), followed by Gemini (30; college) and Bing (40; college; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Large language models provide complex responses to basic questions on hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and management that are seldomly accurate, reliable, or readable.

Differentiation of Hepatocellular Adenoma Subtypes and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI: An Updated Diagnostic Algorithm.

This study evaluated an updated diagnostic algorithm for distinguishing HCA subtypes and FNH on gadoxetate disodium­enhanced MRI. The algorithm included a pathway recommending biopsy for indeterminate lesions that could represent HCA with beta-catenin mutations (which are at risk of malignant transformation) or I-HCA with an atypical MRI appearance.

Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) among patients with non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease (SLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-approved, retrospective study included 119 observations from 77 adult patients (36 women, 41 men; median 64 years) who underwent liver CT or MRI from 2010 to 2023. All patients had histopathologic evidence of SLD without cirrhosis. Three board-certified abdominal radiologists blinded to tissue diagnosis and imaging follow-up assessed observations with LI-RADS. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and inter-reader agreement were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-five observations (63%) were benign and 44 (37%) were malignant. PPV for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-7% for LR-3, 11-20% for LR-4, 75-88% for LR-5, 0-8% for LR-M, and 50-75% for LR-TIV. For LR-5 in identifying HCC, sensitivity was 79-83%, specificity was 91-97%, and accuracy was 89-92%. For composite categories of LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV in identifying malignancy, sensitivity was 86-89%, specificity was 85-96%, and accuracy was 86-93%. The most common false positives for LR-5 were hepatocellular adenomas. Only 59-65% of HCCs showed non-peripheral washout at CT versus 67-83% at MRI, though nearly all had an enhancing capsule. PPV and accuracy of LR-5 for HCC did not differ by modality. Inter-reader agreement for major features ranged from 0.667 to 0.830 and was 0.766 for the final category. CONCLUSION: Despite challenges such as the lower prevalence of non-peripheral washout at CT and overlapping imaging features between HCC and hepatocellular adenomas, LI-RADS may serve as an effective tool in assessing focal liver lesions in SLD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: LI-RADS in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease can effectively diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma and malignancy at computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, thereby guiding clinical management decisions and expediting patient care pathways. KEY POINTS: Performance of LI-RADS is unknown in non-cirrhotic patients with steatotic liver disease. LI-RADS 5 category showed a high pooled specificity of 91-97% for hepatocellular carcinoma. LI-RADS can non-invasively risk stratify focal liver observations in non-cirrhotic patients with steatotic liver disease.

Gastrointestinal devices: common and uncommon foreign bodies.

Devices for the gastrointestinal tract are widely available and constantly advancing with less invasive techniques. They play a crucial role in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and are commonly placed by interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons. These devices frequently appear in imaging studies, which verify their proper placement, identify any complications, or may be incidentally detected. Radiologists must be able to identify these devices at imaging and understand their intended purpose to assess their efficacy, detect complications such as incorrect positioning, and avoid misinterpreting them as abnormalities. Furthermore, many patients with these devices may require MRI, making assessing compatibility essential for safe patient care. This review seeks to provide a succinct and practical handbook for radiologists regarding both common and uncommon gastrointestinal devices. In addition to textual descriptions of clinical indications, imaging findings, complications, and MRI compatibility, the review incorporates a summary table as a quick reference point for key information and illustrative images for each device.

The Role of Imaging for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Consensus Recommendations From the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.

Accuracy of Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measurement in Weight Bearing, Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Weight bearing computed tomography (WBCT) utilizes cone beam CT technology to provide assessments of lower limb joint structures while they are functionally loaded. Grey-scale values indicative of X-ray attenuation that are output from cone beam CT are challenging to calibrate, and their use for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement remains debatable. To determine whether WBCT can be reliably used for cortical and trabecular BMD assessment, we sought to establish the accuracy of BMD measurements at the knee using modern WBCT by comparing them to measurements from conventional CT. METHODS: A hydroxyapatite phantom with three inserts of varying densities was used to systematically quantify signal uniformity and BMD accuracy across the acquisition volume. We evaluated BMD in vivo (n = 5, female) using synchronous and asynchronous calibration techniques in WBCT and CT. To account for variation in attenuation along the height (z-axis) of acquisition volumes, we tested a height-dependent calibration approach for both WBCT and CT images. RESULTS: Phantom BMD measurement error in WBCT was as high as 15.3% and consistently larger than CT (up to 5.6%). Phantom BMD measures made under synchronous conditions in WBCT improved measurement accuracy by up to 3% but introduced more variability in measured BMD. We found strong correlations (R = 0.96) as well as wide limits of agreement (-324 mgHA/cm3 to 183 mgHA/cm3) from Bland-Altman analysis between WBCT and CT measures in vivo that were not improved by height-dependent calibration. CONCLUSION: Whilst BMD accuracy from WBCT was found to be dependent on apparent density, accuracy was independent of the calibration technique (synchronous or asynchronous) and the location of the measurement site within the field of view. Overall, we found strong correlations between BMD measures from WBCT and CT and in vivo measures to be more accurate in trabecular bone regions. Importantly, WBCT can be used to distinguish between anatomically relevant differences in BMD, however future work is necessary to determine the repeatability and sensitivity of BMD measures in WBCT.

Evaluating high-resolution computed tomography derived 3-D joint space metrics of the metacarpophalangeal joints between rheumatoid arthritis and age- and sex-matched control participants.

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is commonly characterized by joint space narrowing. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) provides unparalleled in vivo visualization and quantification of joint space in extremity joints commonly affected by RA, such as the 2nd and 3rd metacarpophalangeal joints. However, age, sex, and obesity can also influence joint space narrowing. Thus, this study aimed to determine whether HR-pQCT joint space metrics could distinguish between RA patients and controls, and determine the effects of age, sex and body mass index (BMI) on these joint space metrics. Methods: HR-pQCT joint space metrics (volume, width, standard deviation of width, maximum/minimum width, and asymmetry) were acquired from RA patients and age-and sex-matched healthy control participants 2nd and 3rd MCP joints. Joint health and functionality were assessed with ultrasound (i.e., effusion and inflammation), hand function tests, and questionnaires. Results: HR-pQCT-derived 3D joint space metrics were not significantly different between RA and control groups (p > 0.05), despite significant differences in inflammation and joint function (p < 0.05). Joint space volume, mean joint space width (JSW), maximum JSW, minimum JSW were larger in males than females (p < 0.05), while maximum JSW decreased with age. No significant association between joint space metrics and BMI were found. Conclusion: HR-pQCT did not detect group level differences between RA and age-and sex-matched controls. Further research is necessary to determine whether this is due to a true lack of group level differences due to well-controlled RA, or the inability of HR-pQCT to detect a difference.

Computed tomography versus ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Some patients undergo both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) sequentially as part of the same evaluation for acute cholecystitis (AC). Our goal was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of US and CT in the diagnosis of AC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases were searched for relevant published studies through November 2023. The primary objective was to compare the head-to-head performance of US and CT using surgical intervention or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. For the secondary analysis, all individual US and CT studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were determined along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prevalence of imaging findings was also evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In the primary analysis of head-to-head studies (n = 5), CT had a pooled sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 78.4-88.2%) versus 79.0% (95% CI, 68.8-86.6%) of US (p = 0.44). The pooled specificity of CT was 94% (95% CI, 82.0-98.0%) versus 93.6% (95% CI, 79.4-98.2%) of US (p = 0.85). The concordance of positive or negative test between both modalities was 82.3% (95% CI, 72.1-89.4%). US and CT led to a positive change in management in only 4 to 8% of cases, respectively, when ordered sequentially after the other test. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of CT is comparable to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, with a high rate of concordance between the two modalities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A subsequent US after a positive or negative CT for suspected acute cholecystitis may be unnecessary in most cases. KEY POINTS: When there is clinical suspicion of acute cholecystitis, patients will often undergo both CT and US. CT has similar sensitivity and specificity compared to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The concordance rate between CT and US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is 82.3%.

Beta-Catenin-Mutated Hepatocellular Adenomas at Hepatobiliary Phase MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Beta-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (ß-HCAs) can appear iso- to hyperintense at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Given the relatively lower prevalence of ß-HCAs, prior studies had limited power to show statistically significant differences in the HBP signal intensity between different subtypes. PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of HBP MRI to discriminate ß-HCA from other subtypes. STUDY TYPE: Systemic review and meta-analysis. POPULATION: Ten original studies were included, yielding 266 patients with 397 HCAs (9%, 36/397 ß-HCAs and 91%, 361/397 non-ß-HCAs). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T and 3.0 T, HBP. ASSESSMENT: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2023, for all articles reporting HBP signal intensity in patients with histopathologically proven HCA subtypes. QUADAS-2 was used to assess risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. Heterogeneity estimates were assessed with I2 heterogeneity index. Meta-regression (mixed-effect model) was used to test for differences in the prevalence of HBP signal between HCA groups. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: HBP iso- to hyperintensity was associated with ß-HCAs (pooled prevalence was 72.3% in ß-HCAs and 6.3% in non-ß-HCAs). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 72.3% (95% confidence interval 54.1-85.3) and 93.7% (93.8-97.7), respectively. Specificity had substantial heterogeneity with I2 of 83% due to one study, but not for sensitivity (I2 = 0). After excluding this study, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 77.4% (59.6-88.8) and 94.1% (88.9-96.9), with no substantial heterogeneity. One study had high risk of bias for patient selection and two studies were rated unclear for two domains. DATA CONCLUSION: Iso- to hyperintensity at HBP MRI may help to distinguish ß-HCA subtype from other HCAs with high specificity. However, there was heterogeneity in the pooled estimates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

The Role of Imaging for GI Bleeding: ACG and SAR Consensus Recommendations.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high health care utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including CT angiography, catheter angiography, CT enterography, MR enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist, which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided. © Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Gastroenterology, 2024. Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is being published concurrently in American Journal of Gastroenterology and Radiology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Citations from either journal can be used when citing this article. See also the editorial by Lockhart in this issue.

World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 Classification Update: Radiologic and Pathologic Features of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinomas.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To describe imaging and pathology features of newly defined papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) based on the WHO 2022 update. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 87 patients with 93 pathologically proven papillary renal cell carcinomas who underwent pre-treatment renal mass protocol CT or MRI. Baseline and post-treatment follow-up imaging was evaluated by two radiologists systematically based on established lexicon. RESULTS: At pathology, 63 (68%) were grade 1-2, 29 (31%) were grade 3-4, and 1 (%) was unreported. At surgical pathology, 84 (90%) were localized (≤pT2b), 5 (5%) were pT3a, and none were ≥pT3b; 4 (4%) had unknown pT stage (core biopsies). 33 (35%) had necrosis and 39 (41%) had hemorrhage. None had sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation. At imaging, 73 (83%) were solid and 16 (17%) were cystic. Of 16 cystic masses, four were Bosniak class IIF (three were heterogeneously T1 hyperintense) and 12 were class IV. All were well-circumscribed. 92 (99%) were hypovascular. Median follow-up for 74 patients was 30 months (IQR 12-56). One untreated patient had non-regional nodal metastasis at presentation, and one patient had metastasis to lymph nodes and bones after surgery, but the patient had unresected renal masses elsewhere without pathology. Otherwise, no recurrence or metastases were detected. CONCLUSION: Most pRCCs present as a hypovascular, circumscribed, solid renal mass. A few pRCCs present as the newly defined Bosniak class IIF subtype. Our results can form the basis of a non-invasive, likelihood score to identify this relatively indolent pathology in the era of virtual biopsy and active surveillance.

Discrepant guidelines in the evaluation of hematuria.

PURPOSE: To assess discrepancies in current imaging recommendations for hematuria among North American societies: American College of Radiology (ACR), American Urological Association (AUA), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA). METHODS: The latest available ACR Appropriateness Recommendations, AUA guidelines, and CUA guidelines were reviewed. AUA and CUA guidelines imaging recommendations by variants and level of appropriateness were converted to match the style of ACR. Imaging recommendations including modality, anatomy, and requirement for contrast were recorded. RESULTS: Clinical variants included microhematuria without risk factors, microhematuria with risk factors, gross hematuria, and microhematuria during pregnancy. CUA recommends ultrasound kidneys as the first-line imaging study in the first 3 variants; pregnancy is not explicitly addressed. For hematuria without risk factors, ACR does not routinely recommend imaging, while AUA recommends shared decision-making to decide repeat urinalysis versus cystoscopy with ultrasound kidneys. For hematuria with risk factors and gross hematuria, ACR recommends CT urography; MR urography can also be considered in gross hematuria. AUA further stratifies intermediate- and high-risk patients, for which ultrasound kidneys and CT urography are recommended, respectively. For pregnancy, ACR and AUA both recommend ultrasound kidneys, though AUA additionally recommends consideration of CT or MR urography after delivery. CONCLUSION: There is no universally agreed upon algorithm for diagnostic evaluation. Discrepancies centered on the role of upper tract imaging with ultrasound versus CT. Prospective studies and/or repeat simulation studies that apply newly updated guidelines are needed to further clarify the role of imaging, particularly for patients with microhematuria with no and intermediate risk factors.

MRI with DWI improves detection of liver metastasis and selection of surgical candidates with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) adds value compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) alone in the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant published studies through October 2022. Studies met eligibility criteria if they evaluated the per-patient diagnostic performance of MRI with DWI in the preoperative evaluation of newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer compared to CECT. Our primary outcome was the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one futile surgery using MRI with DWI, defined as those in which CECT was negative and MRI with DWI was positive for liver metastasis (i.e., surgical intervention in metastatic disease missed by CECT). The secondary outcomes were to determine the diagnostic performance and the NNT of MRI with DWI to change management in pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1121 patients, of whom 172 had liver metastasis (15.3%). The proportion of futile surgeries reduced by MRI with DWI was 6.0% (95% CI, 3.0-11.6%), yielding an NNT of 16.6. The proportion of cases that MRI with DWI changed management was 18.1% (95% CI, 9.9-30.7), corresponding to an NNT of 5.5. The per-patient sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 92.4% (95% CI, 87.4-95.6%) and 97.3% (95% CI, 96.0-98.1). CONCLUSION: MRI with DWI may prevent futile surgeries in pancreatic cancer by improving the detection of occult liver metastasis on preoperative CECT with an NNT of 16.6. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI with DWI complements the standard preoperative CECT evaluation for liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer, improving the selection of surgical candidates and preventing unnecessary surgeries. KEY POINTS: • The NNT of MRI with DWI to prevent potential futile surgeries due to occult liver metastasis on CECT, defined as those in which CECT was negative and MRI with DWI was positive for liver metastasis, in patients with pancreatic cancer was 16.6. • The higher performance of MRI with DWI to detect liver metastasis occult on CECT can be attributed to an increased detection of subcentimeter liver metastasis.

Split scar sign to predict complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for rectal cancer initial staging and restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of the split scar sign (SSS) on rectal MRI in predicting complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant published studies through June 2023. Primary studies met eligibility criteria if they evaluated the diagnostic performance of the SSS to predict complete response on pathology or clinical follow-up in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the SSS. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies comprising 377 patients met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of complete response in the studies was 21.7-52.5%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the SSS to predict complete response were 62.0% (95% CI, 43.5-78.5%) and 91.9% (95% CI, 78.9-97.2%), respectively. The estimated AUC for SSS was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.56-0.94) with a DOR of 18.8 (95% CI, 3.65-96.5). CONCLUSION: The presence of SSS on rectal MRI demonstrated high specificity for complete response in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. This imaging pattern can be a valuable tool to identify potential candidates for organ-sparing treatment and surveillance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: SSS presents high specificity for complete response post-neoadjuvant. This MRI finding enhances rectal cancer treatment assessment and aids clinicians and patients in choosing watch-and-wait over immediate surgery, which can potentially reduce costs and associated morbidity. KEY POINTS: •Fifteen to 50% of rectal cancer patients achieve complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and may be eligible for a watch-and-wait strategy. •The split scar sign has high specificity for a complete response. •This imaging finding is valuable to select candidates for organ-sparing management.

Erosion Identification in Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Rheumatoid Arthritis using High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Bone erosions are a pathological feature of several forms of inflammatory arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The increased presence and size of erosions are associated with poor outcomes, joint function, and disease progression. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) provides unparalleled in vivo visualization of bone erosions. However, at this resolution, discontinuities in the cortical shell (cortical breaks) that are associated with normal physiological processes and pathology are also visible. The Study grouP for xtrEme Computed Tomography in Rheumatoid Arthritis previously used a consensus process to develop a definition of pathological erosion in HR-pQCT: a cortical break detected in at least two consecutive slices, in at least two perpendicular planes, non-linear in shape, with underlying trabecular bone loss. However, despite the availability of a consensus definition, erosion identification is a demanding task with challenges in inter-rater variability. The purpose of this work is to introduce a training tool to provide users with guidance on identifying pathological cortical breaks on HR-pQCT images for erosion analysis. The protocol presented here uses a custom-built module (Bone Analysis Module (BAM) - Training), implemented as an extension to an open-source image processing software (3D Slicer). Using this module, users can practice identifying erosions and compare their results to erosions annotated by expert rheumatologists.

Addressing Challenges of Opportunistic Computed Tomography Bone Mineral Density Analysis.

Computed tomography (CT) offers advanced biomedical imaging of the body and is broadly utilized for clinical diagnosis. Traditionally, clinical CT scans have not been used for volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) assessment; however, computational advances can now leverage clinically obtained CT data for the secondary analysis of bone, known as opportunistic CT analysis. Initial applications focused on using clinically acquired CT scans for secondary osteoporosis screening, but opportunistic CT analysis can also be applied to answer research questions related to vBMD changes in response to various disease states. There are several considerations for opportunistic CT analysis, including scan acquisition, contrast enhancement, the internal calibration technique, and bone segmentation, but there remains no consensus on applying these methods. These factors may influence vBMD measures and therefore the robustness of the opportunistic CT analysis. Further research and standardization efforts are needed to establish a consensus and optimize the application of opportunistic CT analysis for accurate and reliable assessment of vBMD in clinical and research settings. This review summarizes the current state of opportunistic CT analysis, highlighting its potential and addressing the associated challenges.