RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In a previous study, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) was shown to lead to death or disability in 80% of the patients. The treatment for BAO patients in the acute stage includes thrombolysis and intra-arterial thrombectomy, but not all patients benefit from these treatments. Thus, understanding the predictors of outcome before initiating these treatments is of special interest. AIM: To determine the predictors related to the 90-d clinical outcome in patients with BAO in an Asian population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case review of patients admitted to a tertiary stroke center between 2015 and 2019. We used the international classification of diseases-10 criteria to identify cases of posterior circulation stroke. A neurologist reviewed every case, and patients fulfilling the criteria defined in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study were included. We then analyzed the patients' characteristics and factors related to the 90-d outcome. RESULTS: We identified a total of 99 patients as real BAO cases. Of these patients, 33 (33.3%) had a favorable outcome at 90 d (modified Rankin Scale: 0-3). Moreover, 72 patients received intra-arterial thrombectomy, while 13 patients received intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment. We observed a favorable outcome in 33.3% of the cases and an unfavorable outcome in 66.7% of the cases. We found that the initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and several BAO symptoms, including impaired consciousness, tetraparesis, and pupillary abnormalities, were significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome (P < 0.05), while cerebellar symptoms were associated with a favorable outcome (P < 0.05). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the areas under the ROC curve of initial NIHSS score, impaired consciousness, tetraparesis, cerebellar symptoms, and pupillary abnormalities were 0.836, 0.644, 0.727, 0.614, and 0.614, respectively. Initial NIHSS score showed a higher AUROC (0.836) compared to BAO symptoms. CONCLUSION: The most important predictor of an unfavorable outcome was the initial NIHSS score. BAO symptoms, including tetraparesis, impaired consciousness, and pupillary abnormality were also related to an unfavorable outcome.
RESUMO
Background: In most countries, large cerebral artery occlusion is identified as the leading cause of disability. In 2015, five large-scale clinical trials confirmed the benefit of intra-arterial thrombectomy. However, thrombectomy is a highly technical and facility-dependent procedure. Primary stroke centers need to transfer patients to comprehensive stroke centers to perform thrombectomy. The time-lapse during interhospital transfer would decrease the chance of the patient's proper recovery. Communication barriers also contribute to this delay. Aims: We used a smartphone application to overcome communication barriers between hospitals. We aimed to shorten the door-to-puncture time of interhospital transfer patients. Methods: We began using a smartphone application, "LINE," to facilitate interhospital communication on May 01, 2018. We carried out retrospective data analyses for all the transfer patients (n = 351), with the primary outcome being the door-to-puncture time in our comprehensive stroke center (China Medical University Hospital). We compared the three periods: May 01 to Dec 31, 2017 (before the use of the smartphone application); May 01 to Dec 31, 2018 (the 1st year of using the smartphone application); and May 01 to Dec 31, 2019 (the 2nd year of using the smartphone application). We also compared the transfer data with non-transfer thrombectomies in the same period. Results: We compared 2017, 2018, and 2019 data. The total number of transfer patients increased over the years: 63, 113, 175, respectively. The mean door-to-puncture time decreased significantly, going from 109, through 102, to 92 min. Meanwhile, the mean door-to-puncture time in non-transfer patients were 140.3, 122.1, and 129.3 min. The main reason of time saving was the change of the way of communication, from point-to-point interhospital communication to hub-to-spoke interhospital communication. Conclusions: We used this smartphone application to enhance interhospital communication, changed from the point-to-point to hub-to-spoke method. It made us overcome the communication barrier and build up interhospital connection, thus shortening the door-to-puncture time. Our experience demonstrated the importance of close communication and teamwork in hyperacute stroke care, especially in interhospital transfer for thrombectomy.
