Predictors of tissue healing in ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNF.

AIM: To identify factors predicting mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNFα agents with or without azathioprine. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, one-year study biologic naïve patients aged 25-65 years, with corticosteroid-dependent or refractory colitis received combination treatment with anti-TNFα and azathioprine for 6 months followed by anti-TNFα monotherapy. Patients who denied combination therapy or were outside this age range received anti-TNFα monotherapy (controls). Before and at weeks 12 and 54 of treatment the total Mayo score was calculated. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0. Mucosal expression of T helper (Th) cell-lineage specific transcription factors (Tbet, Gata3, Rorc, FoxP3) before treatment was also associated with mucosal healing. RESULTS: Of 67 patients, 58 (86.6%) received combination and 9 (13.4%) anti-TNFα monotherapy. Overall 29 (43.3%) patients achieved mucosal healing; rates were higher in patients receiving combination therapy vs. monotherapy (p=0.03) and in azathioprine naïve vs. exposed patients in the combination group (p=0.01). Mucosal healing was associated with lower pre-treatment mucosal expression of transcription factor Th1-Tbet (p<0.05) and higher expression of Th17-Rorc (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal healing was associated with combination therapy, especially in biologic and azathioprine-naïve patients and pre-treatment mucosal expression of specific Th specific transcripting factors (Tbet and Rorc).

Azathioprine discontinuation earlier than 6 months in Crohn's disease patients started on anti-TNF therapy is associated with loss of response and the need for anti-TNF dose escalation.

OBJECTIVES: A high proportion of Crohn's disease (CD) patients lose response to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and therapy needs to be intensified. We aimed to prospectively determine the predictors and frequency of anti-TNF loss of response and therefore the need for dose escalation and de-escalation in CD patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab. METHODS: All patients were anti-TNF naive while concomitant azathioprine was administered for 6 months. In patients initially responding to anti-TNF and subsequently losing clinical response after the first 14 weeks of therapy, dose escalation was scheduled. During the follow-up period and after 1 year of intensified administration, anti-TNF was de-escalated in patients in remission. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were started on infliximab (n=96) or adalimumab (n=65); however, 29 patients (18.0%) did not respond to therapy and were excluded from further analysis. From the remaining 132 patients (infliximab=77, adalimumab=55), 31 (23.5%) needed a dose escalation for maintenance of remission during a median 28-month follow-up period. Factors associated with loss of response and therefore the need for anti-TNF dose escalation were azathioprine discontinuation earlier than 6 months and smoking. Most patients achieved clinical remission (n=25, 80.6%) without other interventions and among these, 16 patients (64%) were successfully de-escalated to the standard maintenance infliximab or adalimumab dose schedule after 1 year of intensified anti-TNF administration. CONCLUSION: Azathioprine discontinuation earlier than 6 months and smoking in CD patients started on anti-TNF therapy is associated with loss of response and the need for anti-TNF dose escalation.