Death Following a Skiing Incident: Severe Exsanguination Due to Rupture of the Left Renal Artery.

With the growing popularity of winter sports, it is necessary to pay more attention to the types of traumatic injuries that a person can sustain in various incidents related to their practice. We present a case in which an adult man died as a result of a collision with a tree while skiing. Although the deaths are associated with different types and severity of craniocerebral injuries in the majority of the cases, here we are dealing with an abdominal injury with rupture of the stomach, pancreas, and left renal artery. The exact localization of the resulting traumatic injuries and the mechanism of their occurrence were examined. Both macroscopic autopsy findings (gross pathology) and histologically proven ones are presented and described. Presenting this case, we want to raise awareness of the different types of injuries received while skiing, as well as to emphasize the possibility of death in the absence of visible external injuries over the victim's body.

Forensic Pathology and Legal Issues in COVID-19: Case Report and Literature Review.

Autopsy investigations of deaths following nosocomial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection have enormous medical and social significance, as autopsies are essential for the correct statistical recording of COVID-19 deaths, presenting new lessons, which is important to policymakers and in the improvement of public health in general.  Our study is based on the presentation of a case of a road traffic accident involving an elderly 73-year-old female with a complication of nosocomial COVID-19 infection and death leading to forensic pathological investigation. This involved autopsy, histopathological examinations, and other tests, and highlighting the importance of medicolegal matters, including the legal and ethical practicalities encountered in healthcare. This article highlights the fact that patients who have sustained various traumatic injuries accompanied by nosocomial COVID-19 infection have higher risks of morbidity and mortality. The significance of the role of a Forensic Pathologist in dealing with the analysis of injuries and the performance of autopsies to determine the cause, mechanism, and manner of death. In addition, the important lesson of testing patients for COVID-19 more regularly during a long hospital admission period, to offer early treatment and isolation, including avoiding the further spread of the COVID-19 infection variants to patients and healthcare professionals, thereby minimising and preventing hospital-acquired infection and death is stressed.

Accidental Cut-Throat Injury by a Broken Glass: Bloodstain Pattern Analyses and Autopsy Findings.

Injuries in the neck region are rarely observed in forensic practice, especially of accidental origin. Primarily, such cases are associated with homicide or suicide. The neck region comprises different and vital anatomical structures, and even minor trauma could be lethal. In the absence of witnesses to the accident, each finding is of utmost importance, from the death/crime scene investigation - bloodstain patterns and trace evidence - to careful examination of the deceased body. The forensic pathologist has the challenging task of analyzing all the findings to make a statement concerning the cause and manner of death and, if there is something suspicious about the current case, to inform the relevant authorities.

Self-Mutilation: A Way to Protect Yourself From a Committed Crime or to Gain Personal Benefits.

Self-mutilation refers to the state in which a person deliberately hurts himself without the intention to commit suicide but with the motive of some personal gain. Four cases are described in the current study with four different personal motives - drug supply, accusation of intimate partner violence, confrontation of parental prohibition, and a way to hide and escape from a committed crime. Evaluating the injuries due to self-mutilation might be challenging due to atypical lesions and well-structured false stories when the victim has some level of competency. Careful analysis of the victim's story and a thorough evaluation of the sustained injuries are needed. If doubts about artificial injuries exist, immediate consultation with a forensic pathologist is required.

Abdominal Apoplexy: Sudden Death Due to Massive, Nontraumatic Intra-abdominal Hemorrhage.

Abdominal apoplexy or idiopathic spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage (ISIH), the modern way to describe this condition, is a rare phenomenon representing intra-abdominal bleeding with no traumatic origin. The condition is severe and potentially life-threatening. A man in his 70s was found dead at his home. The autopsy revealed a massive hemoperitoneum with no visible traumatic injuries externally or internally. The source of the bleeding was unknown despite the careful examination of the internal organs and splanchnic vessels. The cause of death was attributed to massive exsanguination due to the rupture of a small blood vessel as a complication of generalized arteriosclerosis and hypertensive disease. Despite its rare occurrence, the forensic pathologist should always consider this pathological condition when, during the autopsy, a massive intraabdominal hemorrhage with or without a visible source of the bleeding is discovered in the absence of any visible traumas.

The Moral Dilemma of Euthanasia Through the Eyes of the Medical Society in Bulgaria.

INTRODUCTION: With the development of human society, the question of the value and inviolability of human life begins to occupy a central place in the various social strata and social structures. With the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights after the Second World War, the basic postulates protecting the right to inviolability of human life were laid. The question focused on euthanasia has been discussed in several European countries, such as Germany, Ireland, France, and Italy, leading to considerable interest in the medical community in Bulgaria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed using approved sample cards, analyzing the general knowledge of the medical community in the Republic of Bulgaria about euthanasia and assisted suicide over a period of four months, between January 2023 and May 2023. In this process, 623 people were surveyed, and the questionnaire included several targeted questions through electronically generated samples on the Microsoft Forms platform. The target group had doctors with and without a specialty in various fields of hospital and pre-hospital care, dentists, and students from the fields of medicine and dentistry. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results show that the majority of medical professionals clearly state their positive opinion on the adoption of a law to legalize euthanasia in the Republic of Bulgaria, clearly taking into account the fact that the right to life has always been and always will be the most absolute and fundamental human right. Contrary to the above, it is implied that it is inevitably linked to a quality and fulfilling life without suffering. Identically, they also answered that a person should have the right to know exactly when to end his own life. The medical society in Bulgaria clearly shows its positive opinion regarding the idea that the different forms of euthanasia (active euthanasia and assisted suicide) should be defined as morally and legally permissible. Our research confirms the Bulgarian medical community's opinion that the subject of the problems of euthanasia and its legal regulation are already ripe for public discussion, similar to many other European countries. CONCLUSION: The actual issue of euthanasia as a conclusion raises several questions related to the process of acceptance of standard algorithms for action in such cases where the same action is legalized by law. It also includes the process of acceptance of strict regulations by the countries for the so-called negative phenomenon "death tourism" and several other administrative actions related to the mandatory registration of every case of euthanasia, the implementation of mandatory consultations with a psychiatrist and psychologist for patients seeking euthanasia as the only possible option, and providing possible alternatives regarding their illness. This is the unchangeable cornerstone for standardizing the legalization process and acceptance of "good death" in Bulgaria. In its essence, euthanasia creates both a social and an ethical conflict in our modern society, appearing at the same time as a kind of "stress test" for the health system.