Peripheral nerve stimulation through a 'dry' peripheral nerve catheter for shoulder analgesia: a case report.

Revision shoulder surgery can pose significant analgesic challenges as locoregional blocks are often avoided to enable early recognition of iatrogenic nerve injuries. Our case describes the utilisation of pre-operative and intra-operative low-frequency percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation via a 'dry' interscalene catheter, inserted pre-operatively for a patient presenting for revision total shoulder arthroplasty who was experiencing significant shoulder joint pain despite a prior total shoulder arthroplasty. The clinical considerations and safety aspects are discussed further.

Pain management using a novel hybrid technique of perineural stimulation combined with regional anaesthesia through a stimulating perineural catheter for below knee amputation.

Pain after amputation can be difficult to manage due to its complex aetiology. A multimodal approach to analgesia, including regional anaesthetic techniques, is advised. However, optimal pain management cannot always be achieved, and high doses of opioid analgesics may contribute to adverse effects. We describe the management of an elderly patient with significant co-morbidities undergoing below knee amputation. Pre-operatively, a popliteal sciatic stimulating perineural catheter and a femoral non-stimulating perineural catheter were placed. When pain control was suboptimal on the first postoperative day, a combination of local anaesthetic and a brief period of peripheral nerve stimulation through the sciatic stimulating perineural catheter was used to augment pain control, thereby avoiding additional opioid use. Although nerve stimulation utilising specialised equipment, such as percutaneous stimulator electrodes, has been previously described in acute pain medicine, we demonstrate the use of a novel hybrid technique which combines nerve stimulation through a perineural catheter and local anaesthetic. Further research is warranted to explore the utility of this neuromodulation technique in clinical practice.

Successful postoperative analgesia with ilio-inguinal nerve block following sclerotherapy for a labial venous malformation.

Though ilio-inguinal nerve block has been commonly utilised in male urologic surgery, a single injection ilio-inguinal nerve block alone has not previously been reported for analgesia of the vulva. In this report, we describe the case of a 14-year-old girl undergoing sclerotherapy of a venous malformation affecting the labia majora and minora. After induction of anaesthesia, we performed an ultrasound-guided ilio-inguinal nerve block using a total volume of 15 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% with 1 µg.ml-1 dexmedetomidine which provided effective postoperative analgesia. Though the patient received intravenous analgesia intra-operatively and had an inpatient bed reserved in anticipation of severe postoperative pain, she required no further analgesia and was discharged home following 2 hours in the postoperative anaesthesia care unit. With the additional use of dexmedetomidine resulting in prolonged efficacy of the block, the patient reported effective postoperative relief for approximately 30 hours, solely using ibuprofen for pain relief. This case reminds clinicians that the ilio-inguinal nerve block may provide benefit not only for male urologic surgery but also for procedures involving the external female genitalia, with extended analgesia with the use of dexmedetomidine.

Continuous interscalene block: the good, the bad and the refined spread.

Continuous interscalene block is popular for shoulder surgery, but there are several challenges when performing this continuous block. The interscalene catheter is susceptible to incidental dislodgement and migration due to movement of the head and neck. Another important consideration is phrenic nerve involvement; the phrenic nerve is susceptible to being incidentally anaesthetised with local anaesthetic during interscalene block, owing to its close proximity to the interscalene groove. We present two cases: firstly, a case demonstrating an interscalene catheter insertion approach that provides an effective spread of local anaesthetic perineurally within the interscalene groove, with the additional benefit of preventing catheter dislodgement. Secondly, we present a case in which ultrasound-guided interscalene catheter insertion resulted in phrenic nerve palsy in an asthmatic patient, where dilution or 'wash-off' of local anaesthetic with normal saline and repositioning of the catheter under ultrasound guidance resulted in rapid recovery of respiratory function and adequate pain control.

Cervical epidural analgesia via a thoracic approach using nerve-stimulation guidance in adult patients undergoing total shoulder replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND: Continuous cervical epidural anesthesia can provide excellent peri- and post-operative analgesia, although several factors prevent its widespread use. Advancing catheters from thoracic levels to the cervical region may circumvent these barriers, provided they are accurately positioned. We hypothesize that guiding catheters from thoracic to cervical regions using low-current epidural stimulation will have a high success rate and enable excellent analgesia in adults undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, adult patients were studied consecutively. A 17-G Tuohy needle was inserted into the thoracic epidural space using a right paramedian approach with loss of resistance. A 20-G styletted epidural catheter, with an attached nerve stimulator, was primed with saline and a 1-10 mA current was applied as it advanced in a cephalad direction towards the cervical spine. Muscle twitch responses were observed and post-operative X-ray confirmed final placement. After a test dose, an infusion (2-8 ml/h) of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml and morphine 0.05 mg/ml (or equivalent) was initiated. Verbal analog pain scale scores were collected over 72 h. RESULTS: Cervical epidural anesthesia was performed on 10 patients. Average current required to elicit a motor response was 4.8 +/- 2.0mA. Post-operative X-ray of catheter positions confirmed all catheter tips reached the desired region (C4-7). The technical success rate for catheter placement was 100% and excellent pain control was achieved. Catheters were positioned two to the left, four to the right and four to the midline. CONCLUSION: This epidural technique provided highly effective post-operative analgesia in a patient group that traditionally experiences severe post-operative pain and can benefit from early mobilization.

Thoracic epidural catheters via the caudal and lumbar approaches using styletted multiple port catheters in pediatric patients: a report of three cases.

Advancing catheters from the lumbar and caudal epidural spaces to the thoracic level has been reported to be an alternative to the direct thoracic approach. However, as children grow, the threading of catheters in the epidural space becomes increasingly difficult. This report describes three cases of thoracic epidural placement using a multiport catheter threaded from the caudal and lumbar spaces using electrical stimulation guidance. In the first case, a multiport catheter was threaded 22 cm from the lumbar space to T8 following a failed attempt with a single-port catheter in a 9-year-old boy scheduled to undergo a right nephrectomy. In the second case, a multiport catheter was threaded 26 cm from the caudal space to T9 in a 3-year-old girl undergoing fundoplication. In the last case, a multiport catheter was inserted at the completion of a fundoplication in a 2-year-old girl after it had been confirmed that the single-port catheter inserted prior to surgery had not advanced to the desired thoracic level. The multiport catheter was threaded 17 cm without resistance from the caudal space to T9. In all cases, electrical stimulation was used to confirm the location of the catheter tip at the time of insertion. The position of the catheters was later confirmed by X-ray. The multiport catheter incorporates a stylet, which extends to a closed distal tip, within a catheter body that ejects fluid from three lateral holes in a direction perpendicular to the advancing catheter. These properties may facilitate the reliable advancement of catheters in the epidural space.

Dextrose 5% in water: fluid medium for maintaining electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves during stimulating catheter placement.

It is well documented that a higher electrical current is required to elicit a motor response following a normal saline (NS) injection during the placement of stimulating catheters for peripheral nerve block. We present three cases of continuous brachial plexus catheter placement in which Dextrose 5% in water (D5W) was used to dilate the perineural space instead of NS. Three brachial plexus blocks (two interscalene and one axillary) were performed in three different patients for pain relief. In each case, an insulated needle was advanced towards the brachial plexus. A corresponding motor response was elicited with a current less than 0.5 mA after needle repositioning. A stimulating catheter was advanced with ease after 3-5 ml of D5W was injected to dilate the perineural space. A corresponding motor response was maintained when the current applied to the stimulating catheter was less than 0.5 mA. Local anesthetic was then injected and the motor response immediately ceased. All blocks were successful and provided excellent pain relief with the continuous infusion of local anesthetics.

Thoracic epidural analgesia via the lumbar approach using nerve stimulation in a pediatric patient with Down syndrome.

This case illustrates the threading of an epidural catheter with electrical stimulation guidance from the lumbar epidural space to the thoracic space in a pediatric patient. A 17-year-old boy with Down syndrome, weighing 48 kg, was scheduled to undergo a laparotomy for duodenal obstruction and gastrostomy tube insertion. Combined general and continuous epidural anesthesia was selected for his anesthetic. Following the induction of general anesthesia and tracheal intubation, a 17G Tuohy needle (Arrow International, Inc., Reading, PA) was inserted into the lumbar space (L3-4) using loss of resistance with air. A 20G styletted epidural catheter was then inserted and threaded cranially. As the catheter was advanced, a low electrical current (1-10mA) was applied to the catheter. Motor response was observed from the lower limb muscles to the upper abdominal muscles as the catheter advanced cranially. After 22 cm of the epidural catheter had been inserted, intercostal muscle movement (T9 - 10) was observed at 3.0 mA. Radiographical imaging later confirmed the catheter tip at T10. The patient awoke without distress and was discharged to the ward with subsequent good pain control from a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% with 1 microg ml(-1) fentanyl at 4-6 ml(-1).

Lateral cervical epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation for continuous unilateral upper extremity analgesia following a failed continuous peripheral nerve block.

This case report describes the application of electrical stimulation (Tsui test) to confirm placement of a cervical epidural catheter for postoperative pain management in a patient with a failed brachial plexus block who underwent upper extremity surgery. An epidural catheter was easily advanced under nerve stimulation guidance to the surgical dermatome C4 level without any resistance from the C7-T1 level. Successful analgesia was achieved with a bolus of 2 mg ml(-1) ropivacaine 2 ml and fentanyl 20 microg, followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg ml(-1) ropivacaine with 2 microg ml(-1) of fentanyl at a rate of 2 ml h(-1). This case reminds the clinician that cervical epidural analgesia may serve as an alternative to a difficult continuous peripheral nerve block. Electrical stimulation may also help to confirm cervical epidural catheter placement at the appropriate dermatome to provide effective analgesia with minimal side-effects.