Non-contrast mDixon MR angiography of the neck: Comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography in normal subjects.

ABSTRACT: We investigated the feasibility of non-contrast three-dimensional modified Dixon (mDixon) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the carotid artery.We studied 30 normal patients who underwent non-contrast mDixon and conventional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA of the neck with a clinical 3T MR scanner. Carotid artery signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared between mDixon-MRA and TOF-MRA. Two readers independently evaluated vessel sharpness, image contrast, and overall image quality using a 4-point scale.SNR was significantly higher on mDixon-MRA than TOF-MRA (P < .01). There was no significant difference in contrast-to-noise ratio. The visual score for vessel sharpness was significantly higher on mDixon-MRA than TOF-MRA (P < .01), whereas the score for contrast was significantly higher on TOF-MRA (P < .01).Although non-contrast three-dimensional mDixon-MRA showed lower visual contrast than conventional TOF-MRA, it provided images with significantly higher SNR and better vessel sharpness than TOF-MRA.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE?

OBJECTIVES: The current study evaluated the clinical usefulness of the gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) sequence with single breath-hold in 3.0 T magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). We compared the acquisition time and image quality between GRASE and breath navigator-triggered 3D turbo spin echo (3D TSE). METHODS: We examined 54 consecutive patients who underwent MRCP with GRASE and 3D TSE. We compared the image acquisition time and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct (CBD) and liver. Overall image quality, blurring, motion artifacts and CBD visibility were scored on a 4-point scale by two radiologists. Paired t-tests were used to compare the variables. RESULTS: The mean image acquisition time was 95 % shorter with the GRASE than with 3D TSE (GRASE: 20 s; 3D TSE: 6 min 27 s). The CNR of GRASE was significantly higher than that of 3D TSE (GRASE: 25.4 ± 13.9 vs. 3D TSE: 18.2 ± 9.6, p < 0.01). All qualitative scores for GRASE were significantly better than those for 3D TSE. CONCLUSIONS: 3.0 T MRCP with GRASE sequence with single breath-hold significantly improved the CNR of CBD with a 95 % shorter acquisition time compared with conventional 3D MRCP with 3D TSE. KEY POINTS: • MRCP acquisition time was 95% shorter with GRASE than with 3D TSE. • Overall image quality of GRASE was significantly better than 3D TSE. • Pancreaticobiliary tree visibility with GRASE was better than that with 3D TSE.