Longitudinal changes in the volume of residual lung lobes after lobectomy for lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

It is unclear how the residual lobe volume changes over time after lobectomy. This study aims to clarify the temporal patterns of volume changes in each remaining lung lobe post-lobectomy. A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer at Yueyang Central Hospital from January to December 2021. Lung CT images were reconstructed in three dimensions to calculate the volumes of each lung lobe preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 182 patients were included. Postoperatively, the median total lung volume change rates relative to preoperative values were -20.1%, -9.3%, and -5.9% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Except for the right middle lobe in patients who underwent right upper lobectomy, the volumes of individual lung lobes exceeded preoperative values. The volume growth of the lung on the side of the resection was significantly more than that of the lung on the opposite side. For left lobectomy patients, the right lower lobe's volume change rate exceeded that of the right upper and middle lobes. Among right lobectomy patients, the left lower lobe and the relatively inferior lobe of right lung had higher volume change rates than the superior one. Right middle lobe change rate was more in patients with right lower lobectomy than right upper lobectomy. Six months postoperatively, FEV1% and right middle lobectomy were positively correlated with the overall volume change rate. One year postoperatively, only age was negatively correlated with the overall volume change rate. 75 patients had pulmonary function tests. Postoperative FEV1 change linearly correlated with 1-year lung volume change rate, but not with theoretical total lung volume change rate or segmental method calculated FEV1 change. Time-dependent compensatory volume changes occur in remaining lung lobe post-lobectomy, with stronger compensation observed in the relatively inferior lobe compared to the superior one(s). Preoperative lung function and age may affect compensation level.

Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Oesophagogastric anastomosis is a core part of oesophagectomy, and anastomotic leakage is among its main concerns. We used the oversewing technique to reinforce the anastomosis created with a circular stapler. This study investigated the use of oversewing to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without increasing morbidity. METHODS: This study enrolled 1734 patients who underwent oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April 2012 and December 2019. Using propensity score-matched analysis, the clinical results of postoperative complications were compared between anastomotic-oversewn and -unsewn oesophagectomies. RESULTS: Of the 1734 patients, 661 were included in the anastomotic-unsewn group and 661 in the anastomotic-oversewn group after propensity score matching. The clinical characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, but the frequency of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in the anastomotic-unsewn group than in the anastomotic-oversewn group (10.3% vs 4.7%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic analysis showed oversewn anastomosis and smoking history as the independent factors associated with anastomotic leakage (odds ratios, 0.399 and 2.383; P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). On the sub-group analysis, the relative risk for anastomotic leakage was significantly higher with unsewn than with oversewn anastomosis in patients <65 years old, those with American Association of Anesthesiologists score II, those who had middle segment oesophageal cancer and those who have undergone the McKeown approach and cervical anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomosis oversewing technique may be a practical method to reduce anastomotic leakage, especially in younger patients and those who have undergone the McKeown approach and cervical anastomosis.

Double-lumen tube versus bronchial blocker in lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) dissection along left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is challenging in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, and double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) impedes the exposure of this area. The aim of this study was to determine whether bronchial blockers (BB) could be a better choice for this procedure. METHODS: The clinical characteristics of patients who received McKeown esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection in Wuhan Tongji Hospital between August 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The 1:1 propensity score match analysis was performed to compare the short-term effectiveness, the numbers of lymph nodes dissected, and the patterns of recurrence and survival between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients (192 and 102 in the DLT and BB group, respectively) were enrolled in the study. After matching, 204 patients (102 pairs) who underwent one-lung ventilation with DLT or BB displayed no significant variance in baseline characteristics. The BB group had higher number of LNs resected along left RLN (1.8 ± 2.3 vs. 2.5 ± 2.5, P = 0.001). For patients with metastatic left RLN LN, the BB group had longer medium survival time (15 vs. 32 months, P = 0.045), and tended to have longer medium recurrence-free survival time (6 vs. 15 months, P = 0.079), and lower rate of upper mediastinal and cervical LN recurrence (30.00% vs. 66.67%, P = 0.198). The postoperative complications were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DLT, using BB in esophagectomy may allow more radical lymphadenectomy along left RLN.

After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The increase in the incidence of esophageal cancers (ECs) combined with fewer surgeons working at large centers will increase the likelihood of surgery for ECs being performed during later hours. This study aimed to compare esophagectomies' operative outcomes for EC performed at different surgical starting times. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum curve analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the potential change-point of surgical starting times. The participants were then divided into 2 groups according to the change-point time. Propensity score matching was used to control confounding factors between the 2 groups. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 702 patients who underwent potentially radical esophagectomy from 7 May 2014 to 31 December 2017 in our institute were included. The 3-year all-cause mortality showed a significant change-point at 16:42, with an increment from 56.5% to 76.9% (P=0.043). Esophagectomy that commenced between 17:00-18:59 was associated with significantly lower overall survival (OS) [multivariate hazard ratio (HR): 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25 to 4.90; P=0.010] and disease-free survival (DFS) (multivariate HR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.21; P=0.028). The participants were allocated to the during-hours group and the after-hours group according to the change-point of 17:00. A total of 84 participants in the during-hours group were matched to 33 participants in the after-hours group. The median operative time was shorter in the after-hours group [309 (during-hours) vs. 239 (after-hours) minutes, P=0.014); the after-hours group had a greater incidence of respiratory complications (22.63% vs. 45.45%, P=0.023) and 90-day mortality (0 vs. 9.09%, P=0.021). The 5-year OS (P=0.042) and DFS (P=0.030) were significantly higher in the during-hours group. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomies started during after-hours are correlated with poorer surgical outcomes. It is recommended to cancel selective esophagectomies due to commence after 17:00.