In vitro activities of telithromycin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms compared with azithromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin and daptomycin.

Introduction. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms are difficult to treat and the effect of telithromycin treatment is still unclear.Aim. This study aimed to explore the effect of telithromycin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms compared with azithromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin and daptomycin.Methodology. Eight methicillin-susceptible and eight methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (MSSA and MRSA, respectively) were used for this study. Biofilm biomasses were detected by crystal violet staining and the adherent cells in the established biofilms were quantified by determination of colony-forming units (c.f.u.). The RNA levels of biofilm formation-related genes were determined by RT-qPCR.Results. Telithromycin [8× minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)] eradicated more established biofilms than azithromycin or clindamycin in the four MSSA isolates, and eliminated the established biofilms of six MRSA isolates more effectively than vancomycin or daptomycin. Telithromycin (8× MIC) killed more adherent cells in the established biofilms than azithromycin or clindamycin in the six MSSA isolates, and killed more adherent cells than vancomycin in all eight MRSA isolates. Daptomycin also showed an excellent effect on the adherent cells of MRSA isolates, with similarresults to telithromycin. The effect of a subinhibitory concentration of telithromycin (1/4× MIC) was significantly superior to that of azithromycin or clindamycin, inhibiting the biofilm formation of six MSSA isolates and seven MRSA isolates more effectively than vancomycin or daptomycin. The RNA levels of agrA, agrC, clfA, icaA and sigB decreased when treated with telithromycin (1/4× MIC).Conclusions. Telithromycin is more effective than azithromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, or daptomycin against S. aureus biofilms.

In vitro activities of daptomycin combined with fosfomycin or rifampin on planktonic and adherent linezolid-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecalis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore daptomycin combined with fosfomycin or rifampin against the planktonic and adherent linezolid-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. METHODOLOGY: Four linezolid-resistant and four linezolid-sensitive isolates of E. faecalis which formed biofilms were collected for this study. Biofilm biomasses were detected by crystal violet staining and the adherent cells in the mature biofilms were quantified by c.f.u. determination. RESULTS: Daptomycin alone, or combined with fosfomycin or rifampin (4×MIC) demonstrated bactericidal activities on the planktonic cells, and daptomycin combined with fosfomycin killed more planktonic cells (at least 1-log10 c.f.u. ml-1) than daptomycin or fosfomycin alone. Daptomycin alone (16×MIC) showed anti-biofilm activities against the mature biofilms and bactericidal activities on the adherent cells, while daptomycin combined with fosfomycin (16×MIC) demonstrated significantly more anti-biofilm activities than daptomycin or fosfomycin alone and effectively killed the adherent cells in the mature biofilms. The high concentration of daptomycin (512 mg l-1 ) combined with fosfomycin indicated more bactericidal activities on the adherent cells and more anti-biofilm activities against the mature biofilms than daptomycin 64 mg l-1 (16×MIC) combined with fosfomycin. The addition of rifampin increased the anti-biofilm and bactericidal activities of daptomycin against the mature biofilms and the adherent cells of two isolates, however, which was not observed in other isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin combined with fosfomycin demonstrated better effect on the planktonic and adherent linezolid-resistant isolates of E. faecalis than daptomycin or fosfomycin alone. The role of rifampin in the treatment of E. faecalis isolates is discrepant and needs more studies.

Biofilm formation in erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and the relationship with antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characteristics.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to investigate biofilm formation characteristics in clinical Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) isolates with erythromycin (ERY) resistance from China and further analyze their correlations with antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characteristics. METHODOLOGY: A total of 276 clinical isolates of ERY-resistant S. aureus, including 142 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains and 134 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains, were retrospectively collected in China. Biofilms were determined by crystal violet staining and ERY resistance genes (ermA, ermB and ermC) were detected by polymerase chain reaction. Inducible clindamycin resistance was examined by D test and multilocus sequence typing, and clonal complexes (CCs) based on housekeeping genes were further determined. RESULTS: The frequency of biofilm formation among ERY-resistant S. aureus was 40.9% (113/276) in total and no significant difference was found for the frequency of biofilm formation between ERY-resistant MRSA and ERY-resistant MSSA (44.4% vs 37.3%, P > 0.05). In ERY-resistant MRSA isolates, the frequency of biofilm formation in ermA-positive, gentamicin-resistant and ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates was higher than that in ermA-negative, gentamicin-sensitive and ciprofloxacin-sensitive isolates, respectively (63.9% vs 23.6%, P < 0.01; 60.3% vs 27.5%, P < 0.01; 65.2% vs 26.3%, P < 0.01). In addition, tetracycline resistance facilitated biofilm formation in both ERY-resistant MRSA and MSSA and the frequency of biofilm formation in CC239- or CC7S. aureus isolates with ERY resistance was significantly higher compared with that in CC59S. aureus (both P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The ermA gene, and gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline resistance facilitate biofilm formation in ERY-resistant MRSA isolates and, moreover, ERY-resistant S. aureus isolates with positive biofilm formation exhibited clonality clustering regarding CC239 and CC7.