Return of participant-level clinical trial results to participants: pilot of a simplified centralised approach.

OBJECTIVES: Public access databases such as clinicaltrials.gov achieve dissemination of clinical trial design and aggregated study results. However, return of participant-level data is rarely done. A key barrier includes the proprietary ownership of data by the sponsor. Additionally, investigators may not have access to centralised data, and per International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice, must maintain the confidentiality of participants. This study piloted an approach to return both individual and aggregate clinical trial data to parents of children participating in a series of open-label clinical trials. SETTING AND DESIGN: A small biotech company obtained central ethics approval (centralised institutional review board [IRB], non-exempt). The study was advertised via parent advocacy groups. Parents of trial participants were offered the option to contact an employee (coordinator) within the company, requesting return of their child's study results. Ethics approval covered participation in six countries. The study focused on the sequential clinical trials of vamorolone VBP15-002 (NCT02760264) and VBP15-003 (NCT02760277) (post-results). INTERVENTIONS: Contact initiated by the parent enabled the coordinator to obtain informed consent (and separate General Data Protection Regulations consent), with phone translation when needed. Using date of birth and study site location provided by the parent, the data manager reported the participant number to the coordinator. The coordinator retrieved and compiled data, along with an aggregate summary, which was mailed via a password protected and encrypted memory device to the parent. Prereturn and postreturn surveys were sent to consented parents (n=19; 40% of 48 total trial participants) and investigators. RESULTS: Prereturn surveys indicated a request for as much data as offered, in all formats offered. Postreturn survey showed high satisfaction with the process and data returned. Survey of the physician site investigators (n=10; 100% participation of investigators) voiced general satisfaction with the process, with some reservations. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates an innovative, cost-effective, centralised and labour conservative approach to return of participant-level and aggregate data to participants in studies.

Polygenic adaptation to overnutrition reveals a role for cholinergic signaling in longevity.

Overnutrition by high-sugar (HS) feeding reduces both the lifespan and healthspan across taxa. Pressuring organisms to adapt to overnutrition can highlight genes and pathways important for the healthspan in stressful environments. We used an experimental evolution approach to adapt four replicate, outbred population pairs of Drosophila melanogaster to a HS or control diet. Sexes were separated and aged on either diet until mid-life, then mated to produce the next generation, allowing enrichment for protective alleles over time. All HS-selected populations increased their lifespan and were therefore used as a platform to compare allele frequencies and gene expression. Pathways functioning in the nervous system were overrepresented in the genomic data and showed evidence for parallel evolution, although very few genes were the same across replicates. Acetylcholine-related genes, including the muscarinic receptor mAChR-A, showed significant changes in allele frequency in multiple selected populations and differential expression on a HS diet. Using genetic and pharmacological approaches, we show that cholinergic signaling affects Drosophila feeding in a sugar-specific fashion. Together, these results suggest that adaptation produces changes in allele frequencies that benefit animals under conditions of overnutrition and that it is repeatable at the pathway level.

Adverse outcome pathways and linkages to transcriptomic effects relevant to ionizing radiation injury.

BACKGROUND: In the past three decades, a large body of data on the effects of exposure to ionizing radiation and the ensuing changes in gene expression has been generated. These data have allowed for an understanding of molecular-level events and shown a level of consistency in response despite the vast formats and experimental procedures being used across institutions. However, clarity on how this information may inform strategies for health risk assessment needs to be explored. An approach to bridge this gap is the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework. AOPs represent an illustrative framework characterizing a stressor associated with a sequential set of causally linked key events (KEs) at different levels of biological organization, beginning with a molecular initiating event (MIE) and culminating in an adverse outcome (AO). Here, we demonstrate the interpretation of transcriptomic datasets in the context of the AOP framework within the field of ionizing radiation by using a lung cancer AOP (AOP 272: https://www.aopwiki.org/aops/272) as a case example. METHODS: Through the mining of the literature, radiation exposure-related transcriptomic studies in line with AOP 272 related to lung cancer, DNA damage response, and repair were identified. The differentially expressed genes within relevant studies were collated and subjected to the pathway and network analysis using Reactome and GeneMANIA platforms. Identified pathways were filtered (p < .001, ≥3 genes) and categorized based on relevance to KEs in the AOP. Gene connectivities were identified and further grouped by gene expression-informed associated events (AEs). Relevant quantitative dose-response data were used to inform the directionality in the expression of the genes in the network across AEs. RESULTS: Reactome analyses identified 7 high-level biological processes with multiple pathways and associated genes that mapped to potential KEs in AOP 272. The gene connectivities were further represented as a network of AEs with associated expression profiles that highlighted patterns of gene expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the application of transcriptomics data in AOP development and provides information on potential data gaps. Although the approach is new and anticipated to evolve, it shows promise for improving the understanding of underlying mechanisms of disease progression with a long-term vision to be predictive of adverse outcomes.