Prediction of injury localization in preoperative patients with gastrointestinal perforation: a multiomics model analysis.

BACKGROUND: The location of gastrointestinal perforation is essential for severity evaluation and optimizing the treatment approach. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and imaging features of patients with gastrointestinal perforation and construct a predictive model to distinguish the location of upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation. METHODS: A total of 367 patients with gastrointestinal perforation admitted to the department of emergency surgery in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between March 2014 and December 2020 were collected. Patients were randomly divided into training set and test set in a ratio of 7:3 to establish and verify the prediction model by logistic regression. The receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration map, and clinical decision curve were used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability of the prediction model, respectively. The multiomics model was validated by stratification analysis in the prediction of severity and prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal perforation. RESULTS: The following variables were identified as independent predictors in lower gastrointestinal perforation: monocyte absolute value, mean platelet volume, albumin, fibrinogen, pain duration, rebound tenderness, free air in peritoneal cavity by univariate logistic regression analysis and stepwise regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model was 0.886 (95% confidence interval, 0.840-0.933). The calibration curve shows that the prediction accuracy and the calibration ability of the prediction model are effective. Meanwhile, the decision curve results show that the net benefits of the training and test sets are greater than those of the two extreme models as the threshold probability is 20-100%. The multiomics model score can be calculated via nomogram. The higher the stratification of risk score array, the higher the number of transferred patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The developed multiomics model including monocyte absolute value, mean platelet volume, albumin, fibrinogen, pain duration, rebound tenderness, and free air in the peritoneal cavity has good discrimination and calibration. This model can assist surgeons in distinguishing between upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation and to assess the severity of the condition.

The Victorian Sports Assessment Institute-Achilles Tendinopathy Questionnaire (VISA-A): Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation.

PURPOSE: We aimed to create a standardized cross-cultural adaptation of the simplified Chinese version of VISA-A, test its reliability and validity and conduct exploratory factor analysis on the correlation between items. METHODS: According to international recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires, after considering the opinions of patients, we translated and revised the English version to create a simplified Chinese version of the questionnaire. We recruited healthy subjects in the general specialty of one university (n = 90) and the physical education specialty of another university (n = 89), and we recruited patients with Achilles tendinopathy in a third group (n = 85). Reliability was evaluated by calculating test-retest reliability and internal consistency, validity was evaluated by exploring structural and criterion validity (correlation with the physical function and body pain items of the SF-36), and responsiveness was evaluated by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The simplified Chinese version of the VISA-A had no ceiling or floor effects. Four common factors were extracted and explained by the exploratory factor analysis. The test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) were adequate. The questionnaire had moderate correlations with the physical function and body pain items of the SF-36. The AUC was 0.9407. CONCLUSION: The simplified Chinese version of the VISA-A had good reliability and validity and excellent responsiveness, but the factorial structure is not inconsistent with the dimensions of the original version. It can be used to assess and manage patients with Achilles tendinitis in the Chinese culture.

Hyperosmolar dextrose injection for Osgood-Schlatter disease: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) is one of the common causes of long-term knee pain, leading to functional limitations, long-term deformity of the tubercle interfering with kneeling, and impaired peer-important sport participation. Nonetheless, patient management continues to rely on the usual conservative methods. This study examined the use of hyperosmolar dextrose injection in patients with OSD. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 70 patients with OSD. One group received a hyperosmolar dextrose injection (12.5%), while the other received a saline injection. The injections were conducted under ultrasound guidance. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA) score was used to assess each patient's pain and sport level. RESULTS: The dextrose group outperformed the saline group in improvement in the VISA-Patella (VISA-P) score from baseline to 3 months (27.1 ± 6.5 vs. 1.4 ± 2.6; mean difference 25.4 (22.4 to 28.3); p < .0001), 6 months (31.7 ± 7.9 vs. 25.2 ± 7.8; mean difference 6.2 (3.2 to 9.4); p < .0001), and 12 months (34 ± 9.0 vs. 28.2 ± 7.5; mean difference 5.5 (1.9 to 9.1); p = .0026). The changes in both groups were clinically important, suggesting that both therapies were active treatments. The dextrose group improved too rapidly for spontaneous improvement to explain much of this change. CONCLUSION: After three injections, at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits, the VISA-P scores of the two groups were significantly improved; the dextrose group score was better than the saline group score, and there were significant differences between the two groups.