Perspectives on the impact of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in a multicultural population.

BACKGROUND: Since few studies have characterized painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) symptoms in multicultural populations, this study fielded a survey to better understand pDPN and its impact in African-American, Caucasian, and Hispanic populations. METHODS: Kelton fielded a survey by phone or Internet, in English or Spanish, among adults with pDPN symptoms in the United States between August and October 2015; African-Americans and Hispanics were oversampled to achieve at least 500 subjects for each group. Patients were required to have been diagnosed with pDPN or score ≥ 3 on ID Pain validated screening tool. The survey elicited information on pDPN symptoms and interactions with healthcare providers (HCPs), and included the Brief Pain Inventory and pain-specific Work Productivity and Assessment Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP). RESULTS: Respondents included 823 Caucasians, 525 African-Americans, and 537 Hispanics; approximately half of African-Americans and Hispanics were <40 years of age, vs 12% of Caucasians. Pain was less likely to be rated moderate or severe by African-Americans (65%) and Hispanics (49%) relative to Caucasians (87%; p < 0.05). African-Americans and Hispanics were less likely than Caucasians to report experiencing specific pDPN sensory symptoms. Significantly fewer African-Americans and Hispanics reported receiving a pDPN diagnosis relative to Caucasians (p < 0.05), and higher proportions of African-Americans and Hispanics reported difficulty communicating with their HCP (p < 0.05). WPAI:SHP activity impairment was lower in Hispanics (43%) relative to African-Americans (53%) and Caucasian (56%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multicultural patients reported differences in pDPN symptoms and pain relative to Caucasians, and fewer received a pDPN diagnosis. While further evaluation is needed to understand these differences, these data suggest a need to broaden pDPN educational initiatives to improve patient-HCP dialogue and encourage discussion of pDPN symptoms and their impact in a multicultural setting.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled dose finding study of NGX-4010, a high-concentration capsaicin patch, for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia.

UNLABELLED: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a painful complication of acute herpes zoster. This multicenter, double-blind, controlled study randomized 299 PHN patients to receive either NGX-4010, a high-concentration capsaicin (8%) patch, or a low-concentration capsaicin (0.04%) control patch for 30, 60, or 90 minutes. The mean percent reductions in NPRS score from baseline to weeks 2 through 8 were significantly greater in the total NGX-4010 group (26.5%, P = .0286) and the 90-minute NGX-4010 group (27.8%, P = .0438) compared to the pooled control group (17.3%). After review of the data suggested a difference between genders in reporting of pain scores and a higher proportion of males (61%) in the 60-minute NGX-4010 group, post hoc gender-stratified analyses were performed and showed that the 60-minute NGX-4010 group also had a significantly larger mean percent reduction in average pain scores (28.0%, P = .0331). Pain reduction in the 30-minute NGX-4010 group, although similar in magnitude to the other doses, was not significantly different from control in either of these analyses. Similar results were observed during weeks 2 through 12. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were application-site specific, transient and mostly mild to moderate in severity. PERSPECTIVE: This article reports the safety and efficacy of NGX-4010 applied for 3 different durations (30, 60, or 90 minutes) in patients with PHN. The results identified the 60-minute duration as the dose to be evaluated in subsequent studies and identified a gender effect on reported changes in pain.

Oral zolmitriptan in the short-term prevention of menstrual migraine: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oral zolmitriptan as a short-term preventative therapy for menstrual migraine. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, multicentre, two-phase study. The results of the second phase are reported here (the first phase evaluated zolmitriptan in the acute treatment of menstrual migraine and is reported elsewhere). Women who successfully completed phase I (with either a positive or negative outcome, and who still fulfilled the inclusion criteria) were randomized to zolmitriptan 2.5 mg oral tablet three times daily, zolmitriptan 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo three times daily. Patients were treated for three consecutive menstrual cycles, starting 2 days prior to the expected onset of menses, for 7 days in total. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-three patients completed phase I and were eligible for phase II. The intention-to-treat population comprised 244 patients (zolmitriptan three times daily [n = 83]; zolmitriptan twice daily [n = 80]; placebo [n = 81]). Both zolmitriptan regimens demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo, as measured by the proportion of patients with a >or=50% reduction in the frequency of menstrual migraine attacks (zolmitriptan three times daily [58.6%], p = 0.0007 vs placebo; zolmitriptan twice daily [54.7%], p = 0.002 vs placebo; placebo three times daily [37.8%]). The mean frequency of breakthrough migraine attacks per menstrual cycle was reduced accordingly. Fewer breakthrough attacks were treated with escape medication in the zolmitriptan three times daily (61.6% of attacks; p = 0.0004 vs placebo) and twice daily (60.7%; p = 0.0055 vs placebo) treatment groups than in the placebo group (74.4%). Short-term preventative therapy with zolmitriptan was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Zolmitriptan 2.5 mg oral tablet is effective and well tolerated as a short-term preventative therapy for menstrual migraine attacks.