Otology: Vertigo.

Vertigo, an unexpected feeling of self-motion, is no longer characterized simply by symptom quality but by using triggers and timing. Evaluating vertigo by triggers and timing not only distinguishes serious central causes from benign peripheral causes, but also narrows the differential diagnosis by further classifying vertigo as spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome, triggered episodic vestibular syndrome, or acute vestibular syndrome. A targeted physical examination can then be used to further delineate the cause within each of these three vestibular categories. Neuroimaging and vestibular testing are not routinely recommended. In the management of vertigo, vestibular hypofunction can be treated with vestibular rehabilitation, which can be self-administered or directed by a physical therapist. Pharmacotherapy sometimes is indicated for vertigo based on triggers, timing, and the specific condition, but it is not always beneficial and is used more often for symptom reduction than as a cure. Transtympanic corticosteroid or gentamicin injections are recommended for patients who do not benefit from nonablative therapy. Surgical ablative therapy is reserved for patients who have not benefited from less definitive therapy and have nonusable hearing.

Otology: Cerumen Impaction and Aural Foreign Bodies.

Cerumen lubricates and protects the external auditory canal, but excess accumulation can lead to ear fullness, itching, otalgia, discharge, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Cerumen should be treated whenever symptoms are present or if it limits diagnosis by preventing a needed otoscopic examination. Clinicians should evaluate for cerumen impaction in those using hearing aids and patients with intellectual disability. Cerumen impaction can be treated with cerumenolytics, ear irrigation, and manual removal with instrumentation. Aural foreign bodies can cause ear fullness, otalgia, discharge, and hearing loss. They are more common in children than adults. The most common type of aural foreign bodies in children is jewelry, followed by paper products, parts of pens or pencils, desk supplies (eg, erasers), BBs or pellets, and earplugs or earphones. In adults, the most common aural foreign bodies are cotton swabs or cotton, followed by hearing aid parts and jewelry or ear accessories. Patients should avoid using cotton tip applicators in the external auditory canal. Alligator forceps, small right angle hooks, and ear irrigation commonly are used to remove aural foreign bodies in an outpatient clinic setting, but the choice depends on the type of foreign body. Soft and irregularly shaped objects can be removed without referral to an otolaryngologist. Patients with hard, spherical, or cylindrical objects should be referred to an otolaryngologist if previous removal attempts have failed or if there is ear trauma to avoid worsening its position in the ear canal.

Otology: Hearing Loss.

Hearing loss is the cause of significant morbidity throughout the United States and the world. Because of numerous factors, such as ongoing noise exposure, poorly controlled chronic disease, and an aging population, the burden of hearing loss is expected to continue to increase. Hearing loss commonly is categorized as conductive, sensorineural, or mixed. The type of hearing loss can be determined through a combination of patient history and physical examination, and then confirmed with audiometry and tympanometry. Advanced imaging is not typically necessary, but it may be helpful in specific instances. The presentation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss should prompt urgent referral to an otolaryngologist and audiologist. Management of this condition is selective but may initially include oral corticosteroids. Management for chronic hearing loss involves the use of hearing aids, which can offer a large benefit to users but historically have been expensive and not covered by many insurance plans. Recent US legislation has made hearing aids more accessible and affordable by allowing direct-to-consumer marketing and offering over-the-counter hearing aids without a clinical evaluation.

Otology: Ear Infections.

Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common diagnosis in children who present with symptoms of otalgia, fever, or irritability and is confirmed by a bulging tympanic membrane or otorrhea on physical examination. It often is preceded by a viral infection, but the bacterial pathogens isolated most commonly are Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Watchful waiting may be appropriate in children 6 months or older with uncomplicated unilateral AOM. When antibiotics are indicated, amoxicillin is the first-line treatment in those without recent treatment with or allergy to this drug. Otitis media with effusion (OME) is fluid in the middle ear without symptoms of AOM and typically resolves within 3 months. Tympanostomy tube placement is the most common ambulatory surgery for children in the United States. It is used to ventilate the middle ear space and may be performed to treat recurrent AOM, persistent AOM, or chronic OME. Acute otitis externa is inflammation of the external ear canal, often due to infection. On examination, the ear canal is red and inflamed, with patients typically experiencing discomfort with manipulation of the affected ear. It is treated with a topical antibiotic with or without topical corticosteroid.

Risk of Coccidioidomycosis Infection Among Individuals Using Biologic Response Modifiers, Corticosteroids, and Oral Small Molecules.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to examine associations between the use of biologic response modifiers (BRMs), corticosteroids, and oral small molecules (OSMs) and subsequent coccidioidomycosis infection risk among US Medicare beneficiaries with rheumatic or autoimmune diseases. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used US 2011 to 2016 Medicare claims data. We identified geographic areas with endemic coccidioidomycosis (≥25 cases per 10,000 beneficiaries). Among beneficiaries having any rheumatic/autoimmune diseases, we identified those initiating BRMs, corticosteroids, and OSMs. Based on refill days supplied, we created time-varying exposure variables for BRMs, corticosteroids, and OSMs with a 90-day lag period after drug cessation. We examined BRMs, corticosteroids, and OSMs and subsequent coccidioidomycosis infection risk using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Among 135,237 beneficiaries (mean age: 67.8 years; White race: 83.1%; Black race: 3.6%), 5,065 had rheumatic or autoimmune diseases, of which 107 individuals were diagnosed with coccidioidomycosis during the study period (6.1 per 1,000 person-years). Increased risk of coccidioidomycosis was observed among beneficiaries prescribed any BRMs (17.7 per 1,000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-13.16), followed by individuals treated with only corticosteroids (12.2 per 1,000 person-years; aHR 2.29; 95% CI 1.05-5.03) compared to those treated with only OSMs (4.2 per 1,000 person-years). The rate of those treated with only OSMs was the same as that of beneficiaries without these medications. CONCLUSION: Incidence of coccidioidomycosis was low among 2011 to 2016 Medicare beneficiaries with rheumatic or autoimmune diseases. BRM and corticosteroid users may have higher risks of coccidioidomycosis compared to nonusers, warranting consideration of screening for patients on BRMs and corticosteroids in coccidioidomycosis endemic areas.

The Impact of Virtual Interviews on Recruitment and Implicit Bias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated virtual residency interview adoption. The impact of virtual interviews on program directors' (PD) National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Match satisfaction, their future interview plans, and their perceptions about virtual interviews' influence on bias are unknown. We report the results of a survey of family medicine (FM) PDs about these topics after mandatory virtual interviews in 2020-2021. METHODS: A national survey of all FM PDs was conducted in April 2021 (n=619). The response rate was 46.37% (n=287). Questions asked whether PDs conducted virtual interviews, as well as PDs' general perceptions of virtual interviews' impact on administrative burden, diversity and bias; PD's ability to communicate program culture and assess applicants' alignment with program values; PD's satisfaction with Match results; and plans for interview structure postpandemic. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four (93.1%) respondents performed only virtual interviews; 83.9% (n=220) conducting virtual interviews were satisfied with Match results, with no difference between programs with all virtual interviews vs others (OR 1.2, P=.994). PDs who communicated program values and involved residents in virtual interviews experienced higher Match satisfaction (OR 7.6, P<.001; OR 4.21, P=.001). PDs concerned about virtual interviews increasing bias against minorities before 2020 were still concerned after (OR 8.81, P<.001) and had lower Match satisfaction (OR 0.24, P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most FM PDs conducted entirely virtual interviews in 2020 and were satisfied with the Match. Interview processes including residents and conveying residency culture increased Match satisfaction. PDs are concerned about bias in virtual interviews, but more investigation about bias is needed.