Helicobacter pylori status and endoscopy follow-up of patients having a history of perforated duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the recurrence of symptoms or ulcer disease in patients with a history of perforated duodenal ulcer is related to Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred sixty-three consecutive patients with history of perforated duodenal ulcer unrelated to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs underwent upper endoscopy. Any recurrent symptoms or complications were documented. Regardless of the endoscopic findings, three antral biopsy specimens were taken for histologic examination and a rapid urease test. RESULTS: There was a preponderance of men (male/female = 5.3:1). The mean age was 55.9 years. Sixty-seven (41.1%) patients gave a history of recurrent epigastric pain, seven of whom also had a history of bleeding ulcer. Upper endoscopy was performed at a mean of 74.5 +/- 7.1 months after operation. Positive endoscopic findings were noted in 68 (41.7%) patients; H. pylori was found in the biopsy specimens from 77 (47.2%) patients. Recurrent duodenal ulcer was found in 29 (17.8%) patients and was significantly related to male gender, recurrent epigastric pain, bleeding ulcer, longer interval from previous operation, and positive H. pylori status. Positive H. pylori status and male gender were independent factors associated with recurrent duodenal ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent ulcer disease in patients with a history of perforated duodenal ulcer is related to H. pylori infection.

A prospective randomized trial comparing the use of omeprazole-based dual and triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Controversy surrounds the optimal composition, dosage, and duration of therapies for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We prospectively compared omeprazole-based dual and triple therapies in the eradication of H. pylori in a randomized manner. METHODS: Between June 1995 and March 1997, 1000 consecutive patients with acid-peptic disease associated with H. pylori infection (duodenal ulcer, 388 patients, gastric ulcer, 179 patients; duodenitis, 173 patients; gastritis, 260 patients) were prospectively recruited. They were randomized to either a 2-wk (OA) course of omeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g, both given twice daily, or treatment for 1 wk (OCM) with omeprazole 20 mg once daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 400 mg twice daily. RESULTS: The age of these 1000 patients ranged from 16 to 90 yr, with a mean of 54.9 yr. Side effects occurred in 29.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.6-33.8%) and 10.6% (95% CI 8.0-13.6%) of patients taking OCM and OA, respectively (p < 0.0001). Apart from taste disturbance, however, there were no significant differences in the incidences of side effects between the two groups. One patient in the OA group and four patients of the OCM group could not tolerate the medications, and therefore did not complete treatment (p = 0.37). Seven and 13 patients in the OA and OCM groups, respectively, refused a second endoscopy (p = 0.25). The remaining 975 patients underwent a second endoscopy. Positive endoscopic findings were significantly more common in the OA group (51/492; 10.4%; 95% CI 7.8-13.4%) than in the OCM group (25/483; 5.2%; 95% CI 3.4-7.5%) in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (p = 0.004). On intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the overall eradication rates in the OA and OCM groups were 73.6% (95% CI 69.5-77.4%) and 92% (95% CI 89.3-94.2%), respectively (p < 0.0001). On PP analysis, the corresponding rates were 74.8% (95% CI 70.7-78.6%) and 95.2% (95% CI 92.9-97.0%), respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A course of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for 1 wk is a safe, well-tolerated, efficacious, and cost-effective treatment for H. pylori infection.

A prospective randomized trial comparing the use of the flexible gastroscope versus the bronchoscope in the management of foreign body ingestion.

BACKGROUND: Foreign body ingestion is a common clinical problem in Hong Kong. Some recent reports have proposed the use of flexible nasoendoscopy for foreign body retrieval. The present study is a prospective randomized trial on the use of the flexible gastroscope and bronchoscope in the management of foreign body ingestion. METHODS: Two hundred sixteen patients older than 11 years were prospectively randomized to flexible endoscopic examination using either the gastroscope (108 patients) or the bronchoscope (108 patients). The duration of the procedure was noted. Patients were asked to assess their overall tolerance to the procedure on a scale of 1 (well tolerated) to 10 (unacceptable). RESULTS: A foreign body was retrieved in 68 patients (31.5%). There was no difference between the two groups in the foreign body retrieval rate, type of foreign body retrieved, duration of procedure, and tolerance level. In the group managed with the bronchoscope, however, three patients required the additional use of the gastroscope for foreign body retrieval at (for one patient) or below (for two patients) the cricopharyngeus. The patient's tolerance level was related only to the duration of procedure (rho = 0.386; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of the flexible gastroscope is recommended because of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

A prospective comparison of locally made rapid urease test and histology for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: A number of noncommercial preparations of urease test have been described. The present prospective study evaluated the accuracy of one such preparation for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: From February 1996 to November 1996, all patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy in a single endoscopy facility were included. Three antral biopsy specimens were taken. Two specimens were subjected to histologic examination, and one specimen was placed into a "locally made rapid urease test" (LRUT). Results of histologic examinations were taken as standards for comparison. The final result of LRUT was obtained on scrutiny of color changes at 4 hours after the start of the test. RESULTS: Two thousand three hundred sixteen patients (male/female = 1.5:1) with a mean age of 56.7 +/- 0.4 years were included. Five hundred sixty-two patients (24.3%) had a history of eradication treatment for H. pylori. Nine hundred fifty-three patients (41.1%) were found to be positive for H. pylori on histologic examination. In patients in whom a history of eradication therapy was absent, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the LRUT were 92.8%, 97.6%, 97.5%, and 93.0%, respectively. In patients with a history of eradication treatment, the corresponding figures were 76.1%, 99.6%, 96.2%, and 96.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The locally made rapid urease test provides a simple, safe, rapid, inexpensive, and accurate test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

Hypotension and endoscopic stigmata of recent haemorrhage in bleeding peptic ulcer: risk models for rebleeding and mortality.

Clinical and endoscopic data were collected prospectively in 1050 patients with bleeding peptic ulcer admitted between September 1985 and July 1989 to the care of one surgical team. Seventy-nine patients underwent therapeutic endoscopy soon after admission and in 129 patients either immediate or early elective surgery was performed. Eight hundred and forty-two patients, in whom therapeutic endoscopy was not performed at any stage, underwent initial conservative management and data from this latter group are now presented. Shock on admission was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) less than or equal to 100 mmHg on presentation. There were 10 deaths of 147 shocked patients (6.8%) compared with only 25 deaths of 695 patients (3.6%) not in shock (P less than 0.08). Bleeding recurred in 30 patients (20.4%) shocked on presentation but in only 96 (13.8%) with a BP greater than 100 mmHg (P less than 0.05). Twenty-one of 358 patients (5.9%) with endoscopic stigmata of recent haemorrhage (ESRH) died, but only 14 of 484 patients (2.9%) without such stigmata (P less than 0.05) died. In shocked patients rebleeding was evident in 21 of 73 (28.8%) cases with ESRH but in only 9 of 74 (12.2%) patients in whom ESRH were absent (P less than 0.02). In the absence of fresh blood at endoscopy rebleeding occurred in 22 of 124 (17.8%) shocked patients and only 74 of 629 (11.8%) of those not shocked on presentation (P less than 0.07). When ulcer size was documented rebleeding rates for ulcers less than or equal to 1 cm, less than or equal to 2 cm and greater than 2 cm in size were 54 of 485 (11.1%), 30 of 142 (21.2%) and 12 of 44 (27.3%) respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective evaluation of risk factors for rebleeding and mortality.

Clinical, endoscopic, and laboratory data were collected prospectively in 701 patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. The overall rebleeding rate was 16.1% and increased the risk of a fatal outcome by 17 fold (1.2% versus 20.6%, p less than 0.001). Rebleeding was documented in more than 75% of the group who did not survive following initial conservative management. Rebleeding was more likely (24.1% versus 14.2%, p less than 0.02) when shock was present on admission and the risk of a rebleed was doubled in patients over 60 years of age (22.1% versus 10.9%, p less than 0.001). Ulcers greater than 1 cm in size carried twice the risk of rebleeding (23.9% versus 12.4%, p less than 0.002). Concomitant medical illness had a significant adverse effect on outcome (p less than 0.05). Shock on admission was associated with a doubling of mortality figures (9.5% versus 3.7%, p less than 0.01). The identification of endoscopic stigmata of recent hemorrhage (ESRH) tripled the risk of mortality (7.5% versus 2.4%, p less than 0.002), ESRH were more frequently encountered when ulcer size was larger than 1 cm (61.4% versus 39.8%, p less than 0.001). Respective mortality rates for ulcers less than or equal to 1 cm and greater than 1 cm in size were 1.6% and 12.5% (p less than 0.001), corresponding mortality figures for patients over 60 years of age being 4.4% and 16.4% (p less than 0.002). The risk of a rebleed tripled (6.7% versus 2.6%, p less than 0.02) when ESRH were evident. There was a 6-fold increase in mortality following emergency surgery when compared with conservative management of patients in whom no surgical intervention was necessary (2.6% versus 14.9%, p less than 0.001). In summary, age over 60 years, previous medical illness, shock on admission, large ulcer size, and ESRH were each associated with an increased risk of rebleeding and mortality.