Buruli-RifDACC: Evaluation of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose rifampicin on outcomes in Mycobacteriumulcerans disease, a protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Ghana.

Background: Buruli ulcer (BU) can lead to disfiguring ulcers and permanent disability. The 2030 World Health Organization (WHO) road map for Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) calls for major scaling up in diagnosis and management to eliminate disability due to the disease. Current treatment for BU is with daily oral rifampicin (10mg/kg dose) and clarithromycin (15mg/kg dose) for eight weeks, combined with standard gauze wound dressings. Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)-coated dressings have been shown to irreversibly bind bacteria on wound surfaces resulting in their removal when dressings are changed. This trial aims to determine whether combining a high-dose oral rifampicin regimen with DACC dressings can improve the rate of wound healing relative to standard-dose oral rifampicin combined with DACC dressings. Methods: This is an individual, multi-centre Phase 3 randomised controlled trial, which will be conducted in three clinical sites in Ghana. The primary outcome measure will be the mean time to clearance of viable mycobacteria. Cost and health-related quality of life data will be collected, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed. Discussion: The findings from this trial could lead to a change in how BU is treated. A shorter but more efficacious regimen would lead to improved treatment outcomes and potentially substantial financial and economic savings. Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Repository (registration number; PACTR202011867644311). Registered on 30 th November 2020.

Buruli ulcer (BU), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, manifests clinically as a wound or swelling. There are several approaches for managing this condition. One is the availability of two antibiotics, usually rifampicin in combination with clarithromycin, that can be used to treat the disease. Rifampicin is thought to be the most important of these two drugs. Scientists have found out that a higher dose of rifampicin is safe and may help improve healing outcome and shorten the duration of treatment. Individuals with BU wounds also go through wound dressing procedures at their hospitals and health centres. Commonly, wounds are dressed using Vaseline gauze and bandages. However, it has been observed that some affected individuals heal faster than others even with the antibiotic treatment. Some still have living organisms in their wounds many weeks after the antibiotic treatment. There is a new dressing material called DACC which is believed to permanently bind bacteria on the wound surface leading to their removal when the dressings are changed. This may be a good way to treat and prevent infection without the use of more drugs. This study aims to determine whether combining a high-dose oral rifampicin regimen with DACC dressings can improve the rate of wound healing relative to standard-dose oral rifampicin combined with DACC dressings. Furthermore, cost and health-related quality of life data will be collected and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed. The findings from this trial could lead to a change in how BU is treated. A shorter but more efficacious regimen would lead to improved treatment outcomes and potentially substantial financial and economic savings.

Challenges associated with the treatment of Buruli ulcer.

Buruli ulcer (BU), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans (MU), is the third most important mycobacterial diseases after tuberculosis and leprosy in immunocompetent individuals. Although the mode of transmission remains an enigma, disease incidence has been strongly linked to disturbed environment and wetlands. The blunt of the diseases is recorded in West African countries along the Gulf of Guinea, and children 15 years and below account for about 48% of all cases globally. Prior to 2004, wide surgical excisions and debridement of infected necrotic tissues followed by skin grafting was the accepted definitive treatment of BU. However, introduction of antibiotic therapy, daily oral rifampicin (10 mg/kg) plus intramuscular injection of streptomycin (15 mg/kg), for 8 weeks by the WHO in 2004 has reduced surgery as an adjunct for correction of deformities and improved wound healing. An all-oral regimen is currently on clinical trial to replace the injectable. It is thought that a protective cloud of the cytotoxic toxin mycolactone kills infiltrating leucocytes leading to local immunosuppression and down-regulation of the systemic immune system. Our studies of lesions from BU patients treated with SR have demonstrated treatment-associated initiation of vigorous immune responses and the development of ectopic lymphoid tissue in the BU lesions. Despite these interventions, there are still challenges that bedevil the management of BU including paradoxical reactions, evolution of lesions after therapy, prolong viability of MU in BU lesions, and development of secondary bacterial infection. In this paper, we will mainly focus on the critical and pertinent challenges that undermine BU treatment toward effective control of BU.

Challenges Associated with Management of Buruli Ulcer/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection in a Treatment Center in Ghana: A Case Series Study.

The synergy between Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is well established but not so in Buruli ulcer (BU). We screened confirmed BU cases for HIV infection and followed seven BU/HIV-coinfected patients. Management of BU/HIV was based on the World Health Organization guidelines and patient condition. The HIV positivity among BU patients (8.2%; 11/134) was higher compared with that of general patients attending the facility (4.8%; 718/14,863; P = 0.07) and that of pregnant women alone (2.5%; 279/11,125; P = 0.001). All seven BU/HIV-coinfected cases enrolled in the study presented with very large (category III) lesions with four having multiple lesions compared with 54.5% of category III lesions among HIV-negative BU patients. During the recommended BU treatment with streptomycin and rifampicin (SR) all patients developed immune infiltrates including CD4 T cells in their lesions. However, one patient who received antiretroviral therapy (ART) 1 week after beginning SR treatment developed four additional lesions during antibiotic treatment, while two out of the four who did not receive ART died. Further evidence is required to ascertain the most appropriate time to commence ART in relation to SR treatment to minimize paradoxical reactions.