Safe, selective histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Routine histopathological examination after cholecystectomy is costly, but the prevalence of unsuspected gallbladder cancer (incidental GBC) is low. This study determined whether selective histopathological examination is safe. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was performed. Pooled incidences of incidental and truly incidental GBC (GBC detected during histopathological examination without preoperative or intraoperative suspicion) were estimated using a random-effects model. The clinical consequences of truly incidental GBC were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-three studies (232 155 patients) were included. In low-incidence countries, the pooled incidence was 0·32 (95 per cent c.i. 0·25 to 0·42) per cent for incidental GBC and 0·18 (0·10 to 0·35) per cent for truly incidental GBC. Subgroup analysis of studies in which surgeons systematically examined the gallbladder revealed a pooled incidence of 0·04 (0·01 to 0·14) per cent. In high-incidence countries, corresponding pooled incidences were 0·83 (0·58 to 1·18), 0·44 (0·21 to 0·91) and 0·08 (0·02 to 0·39) per cent respectively. Clinical consequences were reported for 176 (39·3 per cent) of 448 patients with truly incidental GBC. Thirty-three patients (18·8 per cent) underwent secondary surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that at least half of GBC not detected during the surgeon's systematic examination of the gallbladder was early stage (T1a status or below) and of no clinical consequence. CONCLUSION: Selective histopathological examination of the gallbladder after initial macroscopic assessment by the surgeon seems safe and could reduce costs.

ANTECEDENTES: El examen histopatológico rutinario después de la colecistectomía es caro y la prevalencia de cáncer de vesícula biliar (gallbladder cancer, GBC) no sospechado o incidental es baja. Este estudio determinó si el examen histológico selectivo es seguro. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva en PubMed, Embase, Web of Science y en la Biblioteca Cochrane. Se estimaron las incidencias agrupadas de GBC incidental y realmente incidental (GBC detectado durante el examen histopatológico sin sospecha previa o intraoperatoria) utilizando un modelo de efectos aleatorios. Además, se evaluaron las consecuencias clínicas del GBC realmente incidental. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 73 estudios (n = 232.155). En los países de baja incidencia, la incidencia agrupada fue de 0,32% para el GBC incidental (i.c. del 95% 0,25 a 0,42) y de 0,18% (0,10 a 0,35) para GBC realmente incidental. El análisis de subgrupos que incluye estudios en los que los cirujanos examinaron sistemáticamente la vesícula biliar reveló una incidencia agrupada de 0,04% (0,01 a 0,14). En los países de alta incidencia, las incidencias agrupadas correspondientes fueron 0,83% (0,58 a 1,18), 0,44% (0.2 a 0.91) y 0,08% (0,02 a 0,39), respectivamente. Se describieron consecuencias clínicas en 176 (39,3%) de 448 pacientes con GBC realmente incidental. Treinta y tres pacientes (18,6%) se sometieron a cirugía secundaria. El análisis por subgrupos mostró que al menos la mitad de los GBC no detectados durante el examen sistemático de la vesícula biliar por parte del cirujano eran tumores de estadio precoz (≤ T1a) y sin consecuencias clínicas. CONCLUSIÓN: El examen histológico selectivo de vesículas biliares después de la evaluación macroscópica inicial realizada por el cirujano parece seguro y podría reducir los costes.

Treatment of respiratory impairment in patients with motor neuron disease in the Netherlands: patient preference and timing of referral.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We assessed the first evaluation at a large ventilation clinic in the Netherlands to: (i) determine what proportion of patients with motor neuron disease would benefit from earlier referral; and (ii) examine the patient preferences regarding ventilatory support. METHODS: Observational study at a single centre with a catchment area of 7.6 million inhabitants. Data on disease status, the referral process and patients' preferences regarding ventilatory support were collected during the first home ventilation services (HVS) assessment and analysed for correlation with the presence of daytime hypercapnia and suspected nocturnal hypoventilation. The latter conditions require immediate (within 48 h) or subacute (within 3 weeks) initiation of ventilatory support. RESULTS: Vital capacity (in percentage of predicted value, VC%pred) was assessed by referring physicians in 84% of the 217 referred patients; the mean VC%pred was 69% (SD 16). One-hundred and ninety-one patients attended the first HVS assessment without ventilatory support, at a median of 21 days following referral: 18% had respiratory failure (daytime hypercapnia), 19% had normocapnia but were suspected of nocturnal hypoventilation, and 63% had normocapnia without symptoms. Following the HVS assessment, 25 patients (13%) declined home mechanical ventilation; this occurred more often in patients with (14/70) compared with patients without respiratory impairment (11/121; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A meaningful proportion of patients who desire ventilatory support are referred to a ventilation clinic after already developing respiratory failure. Future studies could examine means, including more sensitive respiratory measures, to detect those patients who could benefit from earlier referral.