Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 26(5): e561-e567, 2021 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023844

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Coronectomy of a mandibular impacted third molar is a surgical treatment to minimize the risk for inferior alveolar nerve damage. We aimed to determine whether this procedure affected the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) within the first postoperative week. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study included 50 patients that underwent a coronectomy for an impacted mandibular third molar. The patients completed the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire and questions about pain and analgesic intake on every day during the first postoperative week. RESULTS: Mean OHIP-14 scores were highest during the first three postoperative days; the highest mean score (26.40, SD: 8.67) was observed on the first postoperative day. Mean OHIP scores gradually declined during the first postoperative week, and the mean OHIP-14 score was 9.82 (SD: 9.15) on the seventh day. Physical pain was the highest contributor to the overall OHIP-14 score. Pain gradually declined with time; the lowest mean pain score (3.38, SD: 2.2) was observed on the seventh day. OHIP-14 and pain scores were not significantly different between sexes or between different grades of impaction. OHIP-14 scores were positively correlated with pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: A mandibular third molar coronectomy had a strong effect on patient OHRQoL, particularly during the first three postoperative days.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Dente Impactado , Humanos , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Dente Serotino/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Extração Dentária , Dente Impactado/cirurgia
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 35(5): 433-6, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16472987

RESUMO

In this comparative study, 150 consecutive patients undergoing local intraoral bone grafting randomly received either an oral single dose of 600 mg clindamycin or 2 g of the penicillin phenethicillin 1 h before incision. Primary endpoint was wound infection at the receptor site within 8 weeks of surgery. Secondary outcome measurements included postoperative infections at the donor site and adverse events as a result of antibiotic administration. Mean age of the patients was 36.8+/-12.7 years (range 18-67 years), and 98 patients were females (65.3%) and 52 males (34.7%). Infections at the receptor site were seen in 4 patients (5.3%; 95% CI 0.23-10.4%) of the phenethicillin group and in 2 patients (2.7%; 95% CI 0-6.36%) of the clindamycin group. In both groups, 3 patients had an infection at the donor site. Postoperative infections were predominantly caused by alpha-haemolytic Streptococci sensitive to penicillin. No significant difference was found between prophylactic single doses of phenethicillin and clindamycin with regard to postoperative infection in patients undergoing local bone augmentation procedures.


Assuntos
Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Clindamicina/administração & dosagem , Penicilina V/análogos & derivados , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Transplante Ósseo , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maxila/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilina V/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...