A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy as a Boost for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SAbR) as an alternative for intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy boost for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) after initial chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single arm institutional phase II study of SAbR as a boost for LACC was conducted. Eligible patients had LACC FIGO 2009 stage IB2-IVB, performance status 0 to 3, and one of the following: medically unfit or refused intracavitary or tumor extent required interstitial brachytherapy for coverage. The cervix planning target volume boost (PTVboost) received 28 Gy in 4 fractions. RESULTS: The study was closed with 15 of 21 patients completed owing to concern for toxicity. Median follow-up for this cohort was 19 months. Patients had predominantly advanced stage (III-IV, 53%) with median Charlson comorbidity score of 4. Most tumors were large with a median SAbR boost PTV size of 139 cc (range, 51-268 cc). Tumor size and patient comorbidities probably contributed to the lower-than-expected 2-year local control, progression free, and overall survival of 70.1%, 46.7%, and 53.3%, respectively. The SAbR boost 2 year cumulative grade ≥ 3 toxicity of 26.7% was predominantly rectal (ulcer/fistula).The median SAbR PTV volume was 225 cc versus 95 cc for patients with and without grade ≥ 3 toxicity. On dosimetric analysis, only the percentage of rectal circumference receiving 15 Gy (PRC15) for the SAbR boost was associated with development of grade 3 ulcer or rectovaginal fistula (P = .04), with PRC15 > 62.7% being the strongest predictor of toxicity (AUC, 0.93; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 90%). CONCLUSIONS: In this SAbR boost series suboptimal outcomes were probably related to patient selection and very large tumor volume. This approach may still be considered in patients with smaller tumors unable to undergo standard brachytherapy for cervix cancer.

Association between treatment delays and oncologic outcome in patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine the oncologic impact of delays to surgery, radiotherapy, and completion of therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: The impact of biopsy to surgery (BTS) time, surgery to start of radiation time (STSR), and radiation treatment time (RTT) on locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastases (DMs), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was examined. The cumulative incidences (CI) of LRR, DMs, and CSM were examined using Fine-Gray testing. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were analyzed. On multivariable testing, BTS >50 days was associated with DM (P = .03), whereas RTT and STSR were not. RTT >43 days was associated with LRR (P = .02) in patients with non-p16-positive-oropharynx cancer. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in DM appears to be the mechanism by which prolonged time to treatment initiation leads to worse overall survival. Prolonged RTT has the greatest impact on patients with non-p16 positive oropharynx cancers.

The current state of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer.

Oligometastatic disease is defined as an intermediate state between localized and widespread metastatic disease. Given that in the oligometastatic state gross tumors represent the full extent of disease, there may be a role for curative local therapy despite metastatic disease. As nearly 60% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease and another 45% of patients with initially localized disease will ultimately develop distant metastases, NSCLC represents a prime disease for aggressive intervention. In this review, the definition, prognostic factors, patient selection, rationale and evidence for treatment of oligoprogressive and oligometastatic NSCLC is discussed, including recent prospective trials and future directions.

Patterns of Failure in Patients With Double Hit or Double Expressor Lymphomas: Implications for Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Lymphomas with MYC and either BLC2 or BCL6 rearrangements or MYC and BCL-2 protein overexpression, classified as double-hit (DHL) or double-expressor (DEL) lymphomas, respectively, are associated with poorer response to standard immunochemotherapy. Optimal therapy is not clear, and little information exists on the contribution of consolidative radiation therapy in these patients. This study describes the patterns of failure of DHL/DEL in relation to initial sites of disease and indications for radiation therapy in unselected diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective single-institution study of all patients with diagnoses of non-Hodgkin lymphoma between 2011 and 2015 was performed. DHL status was determined by fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and DEL status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the end of chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox modeling was used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Screening of 275 DLBCL patients yielded a 53-patient cohort, including 32 patients with DHL, 10 with DEL, 9 with a triple rearrangement, and 2 triple expressors. Of the 26 patients whose disease progressed, 15 had primary refractory disease. The remaining 11 failures were relapses after complete response to initial chemotherapy. Of those failures, 6 (55%) occurred at initially involved site(s), and 4 (36%) were isolated initial site relapses. Consolidative radiation therapy was associated significantly with improved PFS on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.94, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: DHL/DEL are associated with high relapse rates, which preferentially occur at initially involved sites. Among patients achieving complete response to chemotherapy, consolidative radiation therapy was associated with improved PFS. This provides a rationale for the continued role of radiation therapy in the treatment of DHL and DEL and requires validation in a larger cohort.

Intermediate Endpoints After Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy: 5-Year Distant Metastasis to Predict Overall Survival.

BACKGROUND: Intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) prognostic for overall survival (OS) are needed for men receiving postprostatectomy radiation therapy (PORT) to improve clinical trial design. OBJECTIVE: To identify a potential ICE for men receiving PORT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed an institutional review board-approved multi-institutional retrospective study of 566 men consecutively treated with PORT at tertiary care centers from 1986 to 2013. The median follow-up was 8.2 yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Biochemical failure (BF), distant metastases (DM), and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were evaluated for correlation with OS and assessed as time-dependent variables in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and in landmark analyses at 1, 3, 5, and 7 yr after PORT. Cross-validated concordance (c) indices were used to assess model discrimination. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: OS at 1, 3, 5, and 7 yr after PORT was 98%, 95%, 90%, and 82%, respectively. In a time-varying model controlling for clinical and pathologic variables, BF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-3.71; p<0.001), DM (HR 6.52, 95% CI 4.20-10.1; p<0.001), and CRPC (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.56-3.92; p<0.001) were associated with OS. In landmark analyses, 5-yr DM had the highest c index when adjusting for baseline covariates (0.78), with 5-yr DM also providing the greatest increase in discriminatory power over a model only including baseline covariates. These findings require validation in prospective randomized data. CONCLUSIONS: While limited by the retrospective nature of the data, 5-yr DM is associated with lower OS following PORT, outperforming the prognostic capability of BF and CRPC at 1, 3, 5, or 7 yr after treatment. Confirmation of this ICE as a surrogate for OS is needed from randomized trial data so that it can be incorporated into future clinical trial design. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed potential intermediate clinical endpoints prognostic for overall survival in a cohort of men receiving radiotherapy after prostatectomy. We identified the development of metastatic disease within 5 yr after treatment as the strongest predictor of overall survival.

Consolidative Radiotherapy for Limited Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patterns-of-failure studies suggest that in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sites of gross disease at presentation are the first to progress when treated with chemotherapy. This knowledge has led to increased adoption of local ablative radiation therapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC, though prospective randomized evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine if intervening with noninvasive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) prior to maintenance chemotherapy in patients with non-progressive limited metastatic NSCLC after induction therapy led to significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a single-institution randomized phase 2 study of maintenance chemotherapy alone vs SAbR followed by maintenance chemotherapy for patients with limited metastatic NSCLC (primary plus up to 5 metastatic sites) whose tumors did not possess EGFR-targetable or ALK-targetable mutations but did achieve a partial response or stable disease after induction chemotherapy. INTERVENTIONS: Maintenance chemotherapy or SAbR to all sites of gross disease (including SAbR or hypofractionated radiation to the primary) followed by maintenance chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included toxic effects, local and distant tumor control, patterns of failure, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (9 women and 20 men) were enrolled; 14 patients (median [range] age, 63.5 [51.0-78.0] years) were allocated to the SAbR-plus-maintenance chemotherapy arm, and 15 patients (median [range] age, 70.0 [51.0-79.0] years) were allocated to the maintenance chemotherapy-alone arm. The trial was stopped to accrual early after an interim analysis found a significant improvement in PFS in the SAbR-plus-maintenance chemotherapy arm of 9.7 months vs 3.5 months in the maintenance chemotherapy-alone arm (P = .01). Toxic effects were similar in both arms. There were no in-field failures with fewer overall recurrences in the SAbR arm while those patients receiving maintenance therapy alone had progression at existing sites of disease and distantly. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Consolidative SAbR prior to maintenance chemotherapy appeared beneficial, nearly tripling PFS in patients with limited metastatic NSCLC compared with maintenance chemotherapy alone, with no difference in toxic effects. The irradiation prevented local failures in original disease, the most likely sites of first recurrence. Furthermore, PFS for patients with limited metastatic disease appeared similar to those patients with a greater metastatic burden, further arguing for the potential benefits of local therapy in limited metastatic settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02045446.

Natural history of 'second' biochemical failure after salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a multi-institution study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the natural history of prostate cancer in men who experience a second biochemical recurrence (BCR) after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After undergoing SRT at one of two institutions between 1986 and 2013, 286 patients experienced a second BCR, defined as two rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of ≥0.2 ng/mL above nadir. Event rates for distant metastasis (DM) or freedom from DM (FFDM), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: At a median of 6.1 years after second BCR, DM, CRPC, PCSS and OS rates were 41%, 27%, 83% and 73%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, interval to second BCR <1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-4.14; P < 0.001], Gleason score 8-10 (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07-2.54; P = 0.022), and concurrent ADT during SRT (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.08-2.88; P = 0.024) were associated with FFDM, while PCSS was associated with interval to second BCR <1 year (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.69-5.32; P < 0.001) and concurrent ADT during SRT (HR 2.15, CI 1.13-4.08; P = 0.019). These risk factors were used to stratify patients into three groups, with 6-year FFDM rates of 71%, 59% and 33%, and PCSS rates of 89%, 79%, and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Following second BCR after SRT, clinical progression is enriched in a subgroup of patients with prostate cancer, while others remain without DM for long intervals. Stratifying patients into risk groups using prognostic factors may aid counselling and future trial design.

Impact of Biochemical Failure After Salvage Radiation Therapy on Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality: Competition Between Age and Time to Biochemical Failure.

BACKGROUND: Disease progression following salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer (PC) is common, and the time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) is heterogeneous. OBJECTIVE: To describe the temporal distribution and clinical impact of BCR following SRT and model outcomes using patient age and time to BCR from SRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective multi-institutional study included 547 consecutive men with lymph node-negative PC receiving SRT from 1985 to 2013. The median follow-up after SRT was 8.4 yr. Intervention All men received SRT with three-dimensional or intensity-modulated RT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: BCR was defined as a rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.2ng/ml above the PSA nadir followed by a sequentially equal or higher value. Additional outcomes included distant metastasis (DM), PC-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall mortality (OM). Cox proportional hazards models, a landmark analysis, and comparison of c-indices were used. Cumulative incidence curves were estimated from a Fine and Gray regression model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The estimated 10-yr cumulative incidence of BCR was 60%. Of the 274 men experiencing BCR, 149 (54%) had BCR within 18 mo of SRT. BCR ≤18 mo after SRT was associated with a higher risk of DM (hazard ratio [HR] 7.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.91-11.3; p<0.001), PCSM (HR 12.3, 95% CI 5.95-25.2; p<0.001), and OM (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.94-4.17; p<0.001). We provide a model to estimate the cumulative incidence of DM and PCSM using age and time to BCR. The retrospective nature of our analysis limits our findings. CONCLUSIONS: A strikingly large proportion of men experience early BCR following SRT and are at higher risk of DM and PCSM. Novel predictive biomarkers are needed to identify men harboring micrometastatic disease to avoid potentially futile local therapies or allow for intensification of systemic therapies. PATIENT SUMMARY: Many men will develop biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after salvage radiotherapy. Men with biochemical recurrence within 18 mo of salvage radiotherapy constitute a cohort at higher risk of distant metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Anatomical patterns of recurrence following biochemical relapse after post-prostatectomy salvage radiation therapy: a multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise the frequency and detailed anatomical sites of failure for patients receiving post-radical prostatectomy (RP) salvage radiation therapy (SRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed on 574 men who underwent SRT between 1986 and 2013. Anatomical recurrence patterns were classified as lymphotrophic (lymph nodes only), osteotrophic (bone only), or multifocal if both were present. Isolated first failure sites were defined as sites of initial clinically detected recurrence that remained isolated for at least 3 months. RESULTS: The median follow-up after SRT was 6.8 years. The 8-year rates of local, regional, and distant failure for patients undergoing SRT were 2%, 6%, and 21%, respectively. Of the 22% men (128 of 574) who developed a clinically detectable recurrence, 17%, 50%, and 31% were lymphotrophic, osteotrophic, and multifocal, respectively. The trophic nature of metastases was prognostic for distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS); the 10-year rates of DMFS were 18%, 5%, and 7% (P < 0.01), and PCSS were 78%, 68%, and 56% (P < 0.01), for lymphotrophic, osteotrophic, and multifocal failure patterns, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that trophism for metastatic site has significant prognostic impact on PCSS in men treated with SRT. Radiographic local failure is an uncommon event after SRT when compared to historical data of patients treated with surgery monotherapy. However, distant failure remains a challenge in this patient population and warrants further therapeutic investigation.

Endoluminal and Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancies: a Systematic Review.

Radiation therapy is an integral component in the multimodality management of many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers at all stages of clinical presentation. With recent advances in technology and radiation delivery, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can be delivered with reduced toxicity. However, despite these advances, EBRT doses are still limited by the presence of radiosensitive serial structures near clinical targets in the GI tract. Relative to EBRT techniques, brachytherapy techniques have a lower integral dose and more rapid fall-off, allowing for high-dose delivery with little normal tissue exposure. Given the unique characteristics of brachytherapy, it is an attractive strategy to treat GI malignancies. This review addresses the application of both high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) to multiple GI malignancies for both definitive and palliative management.

Very Early Salvage Radiotherapy Improves Distant Metastasis-Free Survival.

PURPOSE: Early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer is commonly advocated in place of adjuvant radiotherapy. We aimed to determine the optimal definition of early salvage radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study of 657 men who underwent salvage radiotherapy between 1986 and 2013. Two comparisons were made to determine the optimal definition of early salvage radiotherapy, including 1) the time from radical prostatectomy to salvage radiotherapy (less than 9, 9 to 21, 22 to 47 or greater than 48 months) and 2) the level of detectable pre-salvage radiotherapy prostate specific antigen (0.01 to 0.2, greater than 0.2 to 0.5 or greater than 0.5 ng/ml). Outcomes included freedom from salvage androgen deprivation therapy, and biochemical relapse-free, distant metastases-free and prostate cancer specific survival. RESULTS: Median followup was 9.8 years. Time from radical prostatectomy to salvage radiotherapy did not correlate with 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival rates (R2 = 0.18). Increasing pre-salvage radiotherapy prostate specific antigen strongly correlated with biochemical relapse-free survival (R2 = 0.91). Increasing detectable pre-salvage radiotherapy prostate specific antigen (0.01 to 0.2, greater than 0.2 to 0.5 and greater than 0.5 ng/ml) predicted worse 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (62%, 44% and 27%), freedom from salvage androgen deprivation therapy (77%, 66% and 49%), distant metastases-free survival (86%, 79% and 66%, each p <0.001) and prostate cancer specific survival (93%, 89% and 80%, respectively, p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis early salvage radiotherapy (prostate specific antigen greater than 0.2 to 0.5 ng/ml) was associated with a twofold increase in biochemical failure, use of salvage androgen deprivation therapy and distant metastases compared to very early salvage radiotherapy (prostate specific antigen 0.01 to 0.2 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: The duration from radical prostatectomy to salvage radiotherapy is not independently prognostic for outcomes after salvage radiotherapy and it should not be used to define early salvage radiotherapy. Grouping all patients with pre-salvage radiotherapy prostate specific antigen 0.5 ng/ml or less may be inadequate to define early salvage radiotherapy and it has a relevant impact on ongoing and future clinical trials.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer-Results from a multi-institutional clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We report the outcome of a phase I/II clinical trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for low (LR) and select intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients included men with prostate adenocarcinoma with Gleason score 6 with PSA ≤ 20 or Gleason 7 with PSA ≤ 15 and clinical stage ≤ T2b. For the phase I portion of the study patients in cohorts of 15 received 45, 47.5, or 50 Gray (Gy) in five fractions. Since the maximally tolerated dose was not met in the phase I study, an additional 47 patients received 50 Gy in five fractions in the phase II study. Toxicity using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0, quality of life, and outcome data was collected. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients are included for analysis; 63.7% had NCCN IR and 36.3% had LR PCa. At a median follow up of 54 months the actuarial freedom from biochemical failure was 100% at 3 years and 98.6% at 5 years. Actuarial distant metastasis free survival was 100% at 3 and 5 years. Overall survival was 94% at 3 years and 89.7% at 5 years with no deaths attributed to PCa. Acute and late urinary grade ≥ III toxicity occurred in 0% and 5.5% of patients, respectively. Gastrointestinal (GI) acute and late toxicity of grade ≥ III occurred in 2% and 7% of patients, respectively. A total of four men experienced grade IV toxicity (three GI, one genitourinary). CONCLUSION: SBRT treatment results in excellent biochemical control rates at 5 years for LR and IR PCa patients although doses greater than 47.5 Gy in five fractions led to increased severe late toxicity.

Remote location interstitial brachytherapy with patient stabilization and subsequent transport to an outpatient center for treatment is safe and effective for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: Interstitial brachytherapy is an essential component of definitive treatment for locally advanced gynecological malignancies. Although many outpatient centers are capable of delivering the radiation component of brachytherapy, they are not associated with an operative center for implant placement, limiting the ability to deliver appropriate care. In this study, we report on our experience with noncolocated implant placement and radiation delivery, and the impact of patient stabilization improvements on patient safety. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 9/2010 and 11/2014, 25 patients with gynecologic malignancy underwent interstitial implantation and subsequent transport for high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment. From 9/2010 to 10/2012, patients were transported using a standard ambulance stretcher; from 11/2012 to 11/2014, patients were placed on a patient positioning board or a WAFFLE support. Potential transport-associated toxicity was assessed, and the association between standard and augmented transport types and toxicity was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 234 transports were performed. Median cost of transport was $150 per transport. There were 14 (10 patients) potential transportation-associated toxicities, including two lacerations/local trauma, three infections, and nine ulcers. There were 6 Grade 3 toxicities, all in the standard group. There was no association between stretcher type and laceration or ulcers, but enhanced support was associated with fewer overall toxicities, Grade 3 toxicities, and infections. CONCLUSIONS: Noncolocated implantation and treatment is safe and facilitates optimal therapy. Toxicities potentially associated with transport are minimal and seem to be reduced by augmented stabilization. Understanding that this is a reasonable way to deliver brachytherapy may allow more stand-alone centers to deliver high-quality care for patients and improve gynecologic cancer outcomes in the United States.

Pretreatment biopsy analysis of DAB2IP identifies subpopulation of high-risk prostate cancer patients with worse survival following radiation therapy.

Decreased expression of tumor suppressor DAB2IP is linked to aggressive cancer and radiation resistance in several malignancies, but clinical survival data is largely unknown. We hypothesized that pretreatment DAB2IP reduction would predict worse prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS). Immunohistochemistry of pretreatment biopsies was scored by an expert genitourinary pathologist. Other endpoints analyzed include freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), castration resistance-free survival (CRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Seventy-nine patients with NCCN-defined high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy from 2005 to 2012 at our institution were evaluated. Twenty-eight percent (22/79) of pretreatment biopsies revealed DAB2IP-reduction. The median follow up times were 4.8 years and 5.3 years for patients in the DAB2IP-reduced group and DAB2IP-retained group, respectively. Patients with reduced DAB2IP demonstrated worse outcome compared to patients retaining DAB2IP, including FFBF (4-year: 34 vs. 92%; P < 0.0001), CRFS (4-year: 58 vs. 96%; P = 0.0039), DMFS (4-year: 58 vs. 100%; P = 0.0006), and PCSS (5-year: 83 vs. 100%; P = 0.0102). Univariate analysis showed T stage, N stage, and Gleason score were statistically significant variables. Pretreatment tumor DAB2IP status remained significant in multivariable analyses. This study suggests that about one-fourth of men with high-risk prostate cancer have decreased tumor expression of DAB2IP. This subpopulation with reduced DAB2IP has a suboptimal response and worse malignancy-specific survival following radiation therapy and androgen deprivation. DAB2IP loss may be a genetic explanation for the observed differences in aggressive tumor characteristics and radiation resistance. Further study into improving treatment response and survival in this subpopulation is warranted.

NSCLC cells demonstrate differential mode of cell death in response to the combined treatment of radiation and a DNA-PKcs inhibitor.

The current standard of care for lung cancer consists of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. Several studies have shown that the DNA-PKcs inhibitor NU7441 is a highly potent radiosensitizer, however, the mechanism of NU7441's anti-proliferation effect has not been fully elucidated. In this study, the combined effect of NU7441 and ionizing radiation (IR) in a panel of non-small cell lung cancer cell lines (A549, H460 and H1299) has been investigated. We found that NU7441 significantly enhances the effect of IR in all cell lines. The notable findings in response to this combined treatment are (i) prolonged delay in IR-induced DNA DSB repair, (ii) induced robust G2/M checkpoint, (iii) increased aberrant mitosis followed by mitotic catastrophe specifically in H1299, (iv) dramatically induced autophagy in A549 and (v) IR-induced senescence specifically in H460. H1299 cells show greater G2 checkpoint adaptation after combined treatment, which can be attributed to higher expression level of Plk1 compared to A549 and H460. The enhanced autophagy after NU7441 treatment in A549 is possibly due to the higher endogenous expression of pS6K compared to H1299 and H460 cells. In conclusion, choice of cell death pathway is dependent on the mutation status and other genetic factors of the cells treated.

Polymeric nanoparticles for targeted radiosensitization of prostate cancer cells.

One of the many issues of using radiosensitizers in a clinical setting is timing daily radiation treatments to coincide with peak drug concentration in target tissue. To overcome this deficit, we have synthesized a novel nanoparticle (NP) system consisting of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) NPs conjugated with prostate cancer cell penetrating peptide-R11 and encapsulated with a potent radio-sensitizer 8-dibenzothiophen-4-yl-2-morpholin-4-yl-chromen-4-one (NU7441) to allow prostate cancer-specific targeting and sustained delivery over 3 weeks. Preliminary characterization studies showed that the R11-conjugated NPs (R11-NU7441 NPs) had an average size of about 274 ± 80 nm and were stable for up to 5 days in deionized water and serum. The NPs were cytocompatible with immortalized prostate cells (PZ-HPV-7). Further, the particles showed a bi-phasic release of encapsulated NU7441 and were taken up by PC3 prostate cancer cells in a dose- and magnetic field-dependent manner while not being taken up in nonprostate cancer cell lines. In addition, R11-NU7441 NPs were effective radiation sensitizers of prostate cancer cell lines in vitro. These results thus demonstrate the potential of R11-conjugated PLGA NPs as novel platforms for targeted radiosensitization of prostate cancer cells.

DOC-2/DAB2 interacting protein status in high-risk prostate cancer correlates with outcome for patients treated with radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: This pilot study investigates the role of DOC-2/DAB2 Interacting Protein (DAB2IP) and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) as prognostic biomarkers in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving definitive radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Immunohistochemistry was performed and scored by an expert genitourinary pathologist. Clinical endpoints evaluated were freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), castration resistance-free survival (CRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Log-rank test and Cox regression were used to determine significance of biomarker levels with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with high-risk prostate cancer (stage ≥ T3a, or Gleason score ≥ 8, or prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 20 ng/mL) treated with radiation therapy from 2005 to 2012 at our institution were evaluated. Nearly all patients expressed EZH2 (98%), whereas 28% of patients revealed DAB2IP reduction and 72% retained DAB2IP. Median follow-up was 34.0 months for DAB2IP-reduced patients, 29.9 months for DAB2IP-retained patients, and 32.6 months in the EZH2 study. Reduction in DAB2IP portended worse outcome compared with DAB2IP-retained patients, including FFBF (4-year: 37% vs 89%, P=.04), CRFS (4-year: 50% vs 90%, P=.02), and DMFS (4-year: 36% vs 97%, P=.05). Stratified EZH2 expression trended toward significance for worse FFBF and CRFS (P=.07). Patients with reduced DAB2IP or highest-intensity EZH2 expression exhibited worse FFBF (4-year: 32% vs 95%, P=.02), CRFS (4-year: 28% vs 100%, P<.01), and DMFS (4-year: 39% vs 100%, P=.04) compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Loss of DAB2IP is a potent biomarker that portends worse outcome despite definitive radiation therapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 is expressed in most high-risk tumors and is a less potent discriminator of outcome in this study. The DAB2IP status in combination with degree of EZH2 expression may be useful for determining patients with worse outcome within the high-risk prostate cancer population.

Development of a locally advanced orthotopic prostate tumor model in rats for assessment of combined modality therapy.

The purpose of this study was to develop an aggressive locally advanced orthotopic prostate cancer model for assessing high-dose image-guided radiation therapy combined with biological agents. For this study, we used a modified human prostate cancer (PCa) cell line, PC3, in which we knocked down a tumor suppressor protein, DAB2IP (PC3­KD). These prostate cancer cells were implanted into the prostate of nude or Copenhagen rats using either open surgical implantation or a minimally invasive procedure under ultrasound guidance. We report that: i) these DAB2IP-deficient PCa cells form a single focus of locally advanced aggressive tumors in both nude and Copenhagen rats; ii) the resulting tumors are highly aggressive and are poorly controlled after treatment with radiation alone; iii) ultrasound-guided tumor cell implantation can be used successfully for tumor development in the rat prostate; iv) precise measurement of the tumor volume and the treatment planning for radiation therapy can be obtained from ultrasound and MRI, respectively; and v) the use of a fiducial marker for enhanced radiotherapy localization in the rat orthotopic tumor. This model recapitulates radiation-resistant prostate cancers which can be used to demonstrate and quantify therapeutic response to combined modality treatments.

Effect of PF-02341066 and radiation on non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Recently, a fusion protein of echinoderm microtubule associated protein like-4 (EML4) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been found in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In addition, endogenous expression of phosphorylated c-Met was found to be increased in many invasive NSCLC cases. PF-02341066 (crizotinib) is a novel dual c-Met and EML4-ALK inhibitor, and preclinical studies have shown that treatment with ALK inhibitors leads to drastic tumor regression in xenograft models. A phase I trial of PF-02341066 yielded a 53% response rate and a disease control rate of 79%. We evaluated crizotinib as a potential radiation-sensitizing agent in multiple established NSCLC cell lines with varying expression levels of c-Met and EML4-ALK. The combined effect of ionizing radiation (IR) and PF-02341066 was determined by the surviving cell fraction, cell cycle distribution, apoptosis, DNA double-strand break repair in 5 NSCLC cell lines (A549, H460, H3122, H2228 and H1993) and in in vivo xenograft studies. Treatment of NSCLC cells with either PF-02341066 alone or PF-02341066 + IR did not significantly alter cellular radiosensitivity, DNA repair kinetics and cell cycle distribution; no significant enhancement of tumor growth delay was noted in response to the combined treatment of PF-02341066 + IR. EML4-ALK and c-Met inhibition leads to activation of parallel pathways that converge on Akt signaling which abrogates any radiation-sensitizing effect. Although PF-02341066 is an effective therapy able to suppress tumor growth in tumors that exhibit positivity for either EML4-ALK or c-Met, it did not affect the intrinsic radiation response of tumor cell lines. In the present study, we demonstrated that PF-02341066 did not enhance radiation sensitivity in a panel of NSCLC cell lines.