Regulation of tricarboxylate transport and metabolism in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1.

Despite the significant presence of plant-derived tricarboxylic acids in some environments, few studies detail the bacterial metabolism of trans-aconitic acid (Taa) and tricarballylic acid (Tcb). In a soil bacterium, Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1, we discovered interrelated pathways for the consumption of Taa and Tcb. An intricate regulatory scheme tightly controls the transport and catabolism of both compounds and may reflect that they can be toxic inhibitors of the tricarboxylic acid cycle. The genes encoding two similar LysR-type transcriptional regulators, TcuR and TclR, were clustered on the chromosome with tcuA and tcuB, genes required for Tcb consumption. The genetic organization differed from that in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, in which tcuA and tcuB form an operon with a transporter gene, tcuC. In A. baylyi, tcuC was not cotranscribed with tcuAB. Rather, tcuC was cotranscribed with a gene, designated pacI, encoding an isomerase needed for Taa consumption. TcuC appears to transport Tcb and cis-aconitic acid (Caa), the presumed product of PacI-mediated periplasmic isomerization of Taa. Two operons, tcuC-pacI and tcuAB, were transcriptionally controlled by both TcuR and TclR, which have overlapping functions. We investigated the roles of the two regulators in activating transcription of both operons in response to multiple effector compounds, including Taa, Tcb, and Caa.IMPORTANCEIngestion of Taa and Tcb by grazing livestock can cause a serious metabolic disorder called grass tetany. The disorder, which results from Tcb absorption by ruminants, focuses attention on the metabolism of tricarboxylic acids. Additional interest stems from efforts to produce tricarboxylic acids as commodity chemicals. Improved understanding of bacterial enzymes and pathways for tricarboxylic acid metabolism may contribute to new biomanufacturing strategies.

Regulation of l- and d-Aspartate Transport and Metabolism in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1.

The regulated uptake and consumption of d-amino acids by bacteria remain largely unexplored, despite the physiological importance of these compounds. Unlike other characterized bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, which utilizes only l-Asp, Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 can consume both d-Asp and l-Asp as the sole carbon or nitrogen source. As described here, two LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs), DarR and AalR, control d- and l-Asp metabolism in strain ADP1. Heterologous expression of A. baylyi proteins enabled E. coli to use d-Asp as the carbon source when either of two transporters (AspT or AspY) and a racemase (RacD) were coexpressed. A third transporter, designated AspS, was also discovered to transport Asp in ADP1. DarR and/or AalR controlled the transcription of aspT, aspY, racD, and aspA (which encodes aspartate ammonia lyase). Conserved residues in the N-terminal DNA-binding domains of both regulators likely enable them to recognize the same DNA consensus sequence (ATGC-N7-GCAT) in several operator-promoter regions. In strains lacking AalR, suppressor mutations revealed a role for the ClpAP protease in Asp metabolism. In the absence of the ClpA component of this protease, DarR can compensate for the loss of AalR. ADP1 consumed l- and d-Asn and l-Glu, but not d-Glu, as the sole carbon or nitrogen source using interrelated pathways. IMPORTANCE A regulatory scheme was revealed in which AalR responds to l-Asp and DarR responds to d-Asp, a molecule with critical signaling functions in many organisms. The RacD-mediated interconversion of these isomers causes overlap in transcriptional control in A. baylyi. Our studies improve understanding of transport and regulation and lay the foundation for determining how regulators distinguish l- and d-enantiomers. These studies are relevant for biotechnology applications, and they highlight the importance of d-amino acids as natural bacterial growth substrates.

Engineering CatM, a LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator, to Respond Synergistically to Two Effectors.

The simultaneous response of one transcriptional regulator to different effectors remains largely unexplored. Nevertheless, such interactions can substantially impact gene expression by rapidly integrating cellular signals and by expanding the range of transcriptional responses. In this study, similarities between paralogs were exploited to engineer novel responses in CatM, a regulator that controls benzoate degradation in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. One goal was to improve understanding of how its paralog, BenM, activates transcription in response to two compounds (cis,cis-muconate and benzoate) at levels significantly greater than with either alone. Despite the overlapping functions of BenM and CatM, which regulate many of the same ben and cat genes, CatM normally responds only to cis,cis-muconate. Using domain swapping and site-directed amino acid replacements, CatM variants were generated and assessed for the ability to activate transcription. To create a variant that responds synergistically to both effectors required alteration of both the effector-binding region and the DNA-binding domain. These studies help define the interconnected roles of protein domains and extend understanding of LysR-type proteins, the largest family of transcriptional regulators in bacteria. Additionally, renewed interest in the modular functionality of transcription factors stems from their potential use as biosensors.

Malonate degradation in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1: operon organization and regulation by MdcR.

Transcriptional regulators in the LysR or GntR families are typically encoded in the genomic neighbourhood of bacterial genes for malonate degradation. While these arrangements have been evaluated using bioinformatics methods, experimental studies demonstrating co-transcription of predicted operons were lacking. Here, transcriptional regulation was characterized for a cluster of mdc genes that enable a soil bacterium, Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1, to use malonate as a carbon source. Despite previous assumptions that the mdc-gene set forms one operon, our studies revealed distinct promoters in two different regions of a nine-gene cluster. Furthermore, a single promoter is insufficient to account for transcription of mdcR, a regulatory gene that is convergent to other mdc genes. MdcR, a LysR-type transcriptional regulator, was shown to bind specifically to a site where it can activate mdc-gene transcription. Although mdcR deletion prevented growth on malonate, a 1 nt substitution in the promoter of mdcA enabled MdcR-independent growth on this carbon source. Regulation was characterized by methods including transcriptional fusions, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, reverse transcription PCR, 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends and gel shift assays. Moreover, a new technique was developed for transcriptional characterization of low-copy mRNA by increasing the DNA copy number of specific chromosomal regions. MdcR was shown to respond to malonate, in the absence of its catabolism. These studies contribute to ongoing characterization of the structure and function of a set of 44 LysR-type transcriptional regulators in A. baylyi ADP1.

Cyclic AMP receptor protein regulates pheromone-mediated bioluminescence at multiple levels in Vibrio fischeri ES114.

Bioluminescence in Vibrio fischeri ES114 is activated by autoinducer pheromones, and this regulation serves as a model for bacterial cell-cell signaling. As in other bacteria, pheromone concentration increases with cell density; however, pheromone synthesis and perception are also modulated in response to environmental stimuli. Previous studies suggested that expression of the pheromone-dependent bioluminescence activator LuxR is regulated in response to glucose by cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) (P. V. Dunlap and E. P. Greenberg, J. Bacteriol. 164:45-50, 1985; P. V. Dunlap and E. P. Greenberg, J. Bacteriol. 170:4040-4046, 1988; P. V. Dunlap, J. Bacteriol. 171:1199-1202, 1989; and W. F. Friedrich and E. P. Greenberg, Arch. Microbiol. 134:87-91, 1983). Consistent with this model, we found that bioluminescence in V. fischeri ES114 is modulated by glucose and stimulated by cAMP. In addition, a Δcrp mutant was ∼100-fold dimmer than ES114 and did not increase luminescence in response to added cAMP, even though cells lacking crp were still metabolically capable of producing luminescence. We further discovered that CRP regulates not only luxR but also the alternative pheromone synthase gene ainS. We found that His-tagged V. fischeri CRP could bind sequences upstream of both luxR and ainS, supporting bioinformatic predictions of direct regulation at both promoters. Luminescence increased in response to cAMP if either the ainS or luxR system was under native regulation, suggesting cAMP-CRP significantly increases luminescence through both systems. Finally, using transcriptional reporters in transgenic Escherichia coli, we elucidated two additional regulatory connections. First, LuxR-independent basal transcription of the luxI promoter was enhanced by CRP. Second, the effect of CRP on the ainS promoter depended on whether the V. fischeri regulatory gene litR was also introduced. These results suggest an integral role for CRP in pheromone signaling that goes beyond sensing cell density.