Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems. OBJECTIVES: To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test-retest reliability were 0.904 (p < 0.05) for BPII 2.0 and 0.915 (p < 0.05) for NPI. There was a moderate correlation between the BPII 2.0 Turkish version and the Kujala score. There was a very high correlation between the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and Lysholm knee scores. An excellent negative correlation was found between Norwich and Kujala scores (r = -0.819, p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Norwich and Lysholm scores was -0.662, indicating a high negative correlation (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the Turkish version of BPII 2.0 and NPI were -0.533 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability.

Complex rigid foot deformity correction with hexapod external fixator system.

PURPOSE: Complex rigid foot deformities include three-plane deformities and usually presents with poor soft tissue coverage. In the last decades, gradual correction with computer-assisted fixator became an appropriate option for the treatment rigid foot deformities. This study aims to report our experience about treatment of complex foot deformities using Smart Correction fixator system®. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 13 complex rigid foot deformities of ten consecutive patients treated with Smart Correction fixator system® from 2016 to 2020. Primary outcomes were classified as good, fair, and poor according to previously determined criteria. The outcomes were also assessed with The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Non-parametric analysis (Wilcoxon test) for continuous variables and the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables were used. RESULTS: Plantigrade foot was achieved in all patients after correction program. Supramalleolar osteotomy was applied in nine feet, midfoot osteotomy was applied in two feet, hindfoot osteotomy was required in one foot, and only soft tissue distraction performed in two feet. Two patients had recurrent deformity managed by further acute corrections. The mean MOXFQ scores improved from 72.7 preoperatively to 24.8 at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Present study shows that SCF the reliable option for the treatment of complex foot deformities, which also facilitates three-plane correction and concomitant lengthening with gradual soft tissue balance.

Intraoperative medial wall disruption in Dega pelvic osteotomy: Does it effect the radiographic outcome at medium-term?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiographic outcomes of our patients who encountered medial wall disruption, with those who did not while undergoing Dega osteotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 95 hips with developmental dysplasia of the hip who were treated with Dega pelvic osteotomy. Hips were divided into 2 groups according to medial wall disruption: group A included the hips with medial wall disruption, while group B included the hips without disruption. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, 12 weeks and last follow-up anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis were reviewed for changes in the acetabular index (AI) between groups. RESULTS: There were 22 hips in group A and 73 hips in the group B. Preoperative (34.6 versus [vs] 37.2, p=0.231), postoperative (17.9 vs 18.4, p=0.682), 12th week (18 vs 18, p=0.504) and last follow-up (13.3 vs 15.1, p=0.097). The acetabular index measurements were comparable between the groups. Corrections achieved during surgery, and during the follow-up period were also comparable between the two groups, indicating no loss of radiographic correction caused by medial wall disruption. Ninety one percent of the patients in group A and 90% of group B achieved good or excellent results according to the Severin classification (p=0.944). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that disruption of the medial wall did not have a significant detrimental effect on radiographic correction when performing Dega osteotomy.

Accuracy of the hexapod external fixator in treating tibial angular deformities with or without limb length discrepancy: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Hexapod external fixator systems allow simultaneous deformity correction in multiple planes as well as limb lengthening. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a hexapod frame (smart correction frame) in different types of tibial deformities requiring correction with or without lengthening. METHODS: A total of 54 tibial angular deformities and limb length discrepancies operated with a hexapod frame between January 2015 and January 2021 were classified into four groups: "Group A ( n  = 13): only lengthening," "Group B ( n  = 14): lengthening and uniplanar correction," "Group C ( n  = 16): only uniplanar correction," and "Group D ( n  = 11): biplanar correction." The accuracy of angular deformity correction/lengthening was calculated by dividing the actual correction/lengthening achieved after frame removal by the preoperative planned lengthening/correction. RESULTS: The lengthening accuracy in Group A and Group B was 96.3 ±â€…7.1% and 95.7 ±â€…5.9%, respectively ( P  = 0.685). The angular deformity correction accuracy was 85.1 ±â€…9.9% for Group B, 85.2 ±â€…13.9% for Group C, and 80.2 ±â€…18.4% for Group D ( P  = 0.852). A revision program was performed in six cases (1 in Group B, 1 in Group C, and 4 in Group D) for full correction of the deformities. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of tibial lengthening is high with the hexapod frame and is minimally affected by simultaneous deformity correction; however, the accuracy of angular correction slightly reduces as the deformity becomes more complex. Surgeons should be aware that reprogramming may be required after complex deformity correction.

Femoral lengthening using limb reconstruction system augmented with only one antegrade flexible nail in children: early results.

Several techniques have been described for decreasing the duration of external fixator use, augmenting stability, and minimizing complications. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical results and complications of femoral lengthening procedures using the Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) in combination with a single antegrade flexible intramedullary nail (FIN). Femoral lengthening with LRS and FIN was applied to 14 patients (aged 6-16 years) between 2017 and 2021. The etiology was a congenital femoral deficiency in 12 patients and post-traumatic growth arrest in two. A single nail was inserted antegradely through the trochanteric apophysis in each patient. Radiographs and medical records of the patients were assessed retrospectively. The mean lengthening achieved was 4.8 ±â€…1.0 cm. The mean duration of external fixation was 181 days (range 139-248 days) and the mean healing index was 39.6 ±â€…12.1 days/cm. The mean values of mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, mechanical lateral distal tibial angle, mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle, and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle were within the normal range at the last follow-up. Seven of the 14 cases had a regenerate deformity that caused a displacement of more than 2 mm in the mechanical axis deviation, none of them was greater than 10 mm and considered clinically insignificant. Fracture was seen in two limbs with regenerate deformity. This study suggests that LRS in combination with only one FIN may be an effective alternative for femoral lengthening, with acceptable complication rates.