Unveiling Neglected Concerns: Possible Severe Hepatic Complications after Nephrectomy in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease - A Case Report.

Introduction: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic kidney disease and the 4th leading cause of renal replacement therapy in the world. ADPKD is a systemic disorder as cysts may develop in several organs. Liver cysts are the most common extrarenal manifestations and are often incidentally detected. Even though cysts do not influence liver function, they can grow to a very great size and can significantly enlarge liver volume, causing structural distortion of the biliary tree and patient discomfort due to the mass effect. Nephrectomy is frequently considered in preparation for renal transplantation in patients with remarkable kidneys' enlargement. There are currently no globally recognized clinical guidelines for nephrectomy. Although cysts do not normally affect liver function in ADPKD, after nephrectomy cases of liver fibrosis and Budd-Chiari have been reported. These are uncommon disorders due to the obstruction of the blood flow in the hepatic venous causing spleen and liver volume enlargement, portal hypertension, and hepatic cirrhosis. Case Presentation: We present a case of hepatic fibrosis with splenomegaly and severe pancytopenia as a tardive complication after bilateral nephrectomy in 47-year-old ADPKD patient. Conclusion: This finding underscores the critical significance of meticulously examining the anatomical relationship between polycystic kidneys and the liver before performing nephrectomy. Additionally, it highlights the importance of assessing liver involvement and associated complications. By integrating liver assessment into the criteria, we can significantly enhance patient care and improve the overall management of ADPKD before kidney transplantation.

[The Management of Patients with Adult Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) Requires a Multidisciplinary Approach].

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic kidney disease. Its main feature is the progressive enlargement of both kidneys with progressive loss of kidney function. ADPKD is the fourth leading cause of terminal renal failure in the world. Even today there are still uncertainties and poor information. Patients too often have a renunciatory and passive attitude toward the disease. However, there are currently no internationally accepted clinical practice guidelines, and there are significant regional variations in approaches to the diagnosis, clinical evaluation, prevention, and treatment of ADPKD. Therefore, we believe it is important to point out the conduct of our specialist outpatient clinic for ADPKD, which from the beginning has developed a multidisciplinary approach (nephrologists, geneticists, psychologists, radiologists, nutritionists) to face the disease at 360° and therefore not only from a purely nephrological point of view. Such a strategy not only enables patients to receive a timely and accurate diagnosis of the disease, but also ensures that they will receive a thorough and focused follow-up over time, that can prevent or at least slow down the disease in its evolution providing patients with a serene awareness of their condition as much as possible.

Congenital solitary kidney in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: Where do known genes end and the unknown begin?

We present the case of a 41-year-old man patient diagnosed with solitary left kidney with few cysts. He has a family history of unilateral renal agenesis (URA) but no for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Genetic testing revealed PKD1 gene intron 11 heterozygous nucleotide variant c.2854-23G>T, but no gene mutation implicated in URA. Just eight cases of ADPKD with one kidney have been recorded globally. PC1 and PC2 disruption, causing primary cilia malformation or absence resulting in relevant in the first embryonic development alteration. Cillia's crucial significance in many diseases will require more research.

[The FRASNET study: identification of clinical and social factors of renal failure in an elderly population].

Background. Chronic renal failure is an epidemic in elderly patients. Older population have an increased prevalence of frailty and sarcopenia, associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes such as falls, hospitalization, disability. Aim. Describe the sociodemographic and clinical variables of an elderly Lombard population and identify predictors of renal insufficiency. Materials and methods. Cross-sectional observational study conducted in hospitals, in recreational centers for the elderly, in the Universities of the Third Age of the provinces of Milan and Monza-Brianza conducted through a convenience sampling of 1250 subjects over the age of 65. Results. The study identified living alone, annual individual income < € 10,000, polypharmacy, sarcopenia and frailty as predictors of chronic kidney failure. The sample has a mean eGFR of 71.74 mL/min/1.73m2 (SD ± 16.56). Older people living alone are more likely to develop CRI (P = 0.031, confidence interval, CI [1.031-1.905]) as well as having an income < € 10,000 (P = 0.002, CI [0.392-0.923]). Taking more than 11 drugs a day increases the probability of having chronic renal failure by 16 times (P = 0.012, CI [1.155-3.16]). Sarcopenia and frailty increase the likelihood of having chronic renal failure (CRI) (P = 0.001, CI [1.198-2.095]). Conclusions. Identifying predictors of chronic kidney failure is a key step in introducing preventive measures and providing better care to the elderly population.

[Anti-angiogenic drugs and hypertension: from multidisciplinary collaboration to greater care].

Anti-angiogenic drugs are widely used in cancer therapy. Their main targets of action are the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGF-R). Anti-angiogenic drugs are used to reduce the growth of the tumor and its metastases by acting on the phenomenon of tumor neo-angiogenesis. However, they are known for their side effects such as hypertension, acute kidney injury (AKI), and congestive heart failure. Methods: retrospective study conducted on 57 consecutive patients known for ovarian cancer. Patients treated with Bevacizumab, as first-line, relapse, or maintenance treatment (2015-2022). Results: according to FIGO staging, 98.2% (56 out of 57) of the patients in the study had third degree disease (G3). 49% of patients developed hypertension after starting Bevacizumab therapy (82% grade 2 according to CTCAE v.5). 89% of hypertensive patients started treatment and its management was multidisciplinary with nephrological consultation in 68% of cases. Only 3 out of 57 women discontinued treatment due to hypertension, and in only one of them it was not possible to restart it. Conclusions: the evaluation of the patient by a multidisciplinary team (gynecologist and nephrologist) is essential to minimize the morbidity and mortality of patients, and to avoid the interruption of antineoplastic treatment.