Interpreting a single antistreptolysin O test: a comparison of the "upper limit of normal" and likelihood ratio methods.

Single serologic tests may occasionally influence clinicians in making diagnoses. The antistreptolysin O (ASO) test is a frequently used tool for detecting recent Streptococcus pyogenes infection and is helpful in the diagnosis of diseases like rheumatic fever. Using data from a 1989 prospective study of 600 healthy male military recruits, in which 43% experienced S. pyogenes upper respiratory tract infection (2-dilution rise in ASO), this report compared two methods of interpreting a single ASO titer. Using the "upper limit of normal" (80 percentile) method, recruits with an ASO titer of greater than 400 showed evidence of recent S. pyogenes infection. This method had a sensitivity and specificity of only 65.9 and 81.9% respectively. In contrast to the "yes-no" dichotomy of the "upper limit of normal" method, the likelihood ratio method statistics were ASO value specific, more consistent with clinical judgment, and better emphasized the caution clinicians must use in interpreting a single ASO test.

Low temperature protocol for efficient transformation of Mycobacterium smegmatis spheroplasts.

Spheroplasts of Mycobacterium smegmatis LM15, strain 607, were prepared by a combined treatment with glycine and lysozyme. The spheroplasts were tested for ability to take up and express purified mycobacteriophage DNA. Exposure of 1.0 x 10(8) to 1.0 x 10(9) spheroplasts to saturating DNA (1 microgram) for 15 min at 5 degrees C resulted in a transfection efficiency of approximately 0.009% . The transfer of the beta-lactamase marker with DNA purified from strain LM15 to spheroplasts of a beta-lactamase-negative mutant, strain LM144, was achieved. The DNA-treated cultures, after reversion to the bacillary form, contained 20-fold more penicillin-resistant cells than the nontreated control culture. Approximately 80% of the penicillin-resistant colonies from the DNA-treated cells were positive for beta-lactamase Cell-free extracts of penicillin-resistant transformants contained beta-lactamase activity that ranged from 0.046 to 0.134 micromol of benzylpenicillin hydrolyzed/min per mg protein. This low temperature procedure is recommended for high efficiency transformation of M. smegmatis.

Oral erythromycin prophylaxis against Streptococcus pyogenes infection in penicillin-allergic military recruits: a randomized clinical trial.

Historically, military recruits have required benzathine penicillin G to prevent epidemics of Streptococcus pyogenes. In this randomized clinical trial, low-dose oral erythromycin was evaluated as an alternative for prophylaxis against group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in penicillin-allergic recruits. US Marine Corps recruits (186) reporting penicillin allergy were randomly given either oral erythromycin (250 mg twice a day) or a vitamin (one tablet daily) for 60 days. Evidence of infection was defined as a two-dilution rise in anti-streptolysin O titer. The erythromycin group had a significantly lower risk of S. pyogenes infection than did the vitamin group (relative risk 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.89). There was no significant difference among the treatment groups in isolation of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci from throat cultures. Low-dose oral erythromycin appears as effective as benzanthine penicillin G in preventing S. pyogenes infection.

Hyperendemic Streptococcus pyogenes infection despite prophylaxis with penicillin G benzathine.

BACKGROUND: In closely confined populations, in which epidemics of Streptococcus pyogenes infection are common, penicillin G benzathine has long been used prophylactically to reduce morbidity from this pathogen. We report on our investigations of the effectiveness of penicillin G benzathine prophylaxis at a military recruit camp. METHODS: We prospectively studied the rates of pharyngeal colonization and infection by S. pyogenes among 736 male U.S. Marine Corps recruits from January through March 1989. Throat swabs for culture, clinical data, and questionnaire data were obtained during six examinations at intervals of two weeks. Serum samples obtained before training, after training, and from acutely ill recruits were analyzed with use of an antistreptolysin O microtitration technique. RESULTS: Although 93 percent of the recruits received prophylaxis with two intramuscular injections of 1.2 million units of penicillin G benzathine each (administered 30 to 39 days apart), 33 percent of the recruits were colonized by S. pyogenes, and 42 percent had infection (as defined by a two-dilution increase in the antistreptolysin O titer). Thirty-seven percent of 265 recruits who reported a sore throat and were infected with S. pyogenes did not seek medical attention. The recruits who were allergic to penicillin (7 percent of the total), who received no prophylaxis, were more likely to be colonized; an increased risk of colonization and infection among the nonallergic recruits was associated with the presence of a higher percentage of allergic recruits in the platoon. After the study was completed, all recruits who were allergic to penicillin were prescribed 250 mg of oral erythromycin twice daily (a total daily dose of 500 mg) for 60 days. Subsequently, the average weekly rate of clinically evident S. pyogenes pharyngitis fell by more than 75 percent. CONCLUSIONS: If the prevention of S. pyogenes infection is to be effective in closely confined populations such as military recruits, prophylactic antibiotics must be administered to all members of the population. Exempting those who are allergic to penicillin may create a bacterial reservoir from which infection can be transmitted to nonallergic members of the population.