Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stromal Cells Influences Their Immunosuppressive Potential toward Allogenic CD4+ T Cells.

The differentiation ability of human periodontal ligament mesenchymal stromal cells (hPDL-MSCs) in vivo is limited; therefore, some studies considered strategies involving their pre-differentiation in vitro. However, it is not known how the differentiation of hPDL-MSCs influences their immunomodulatory properties. This study investigated how osteogenic differentiation of hPDL-MSCs affects their ability to suppress CD4+ T-lymphocyte proliferation. hPDL-MSCs were cultured for 21 days in osteogenic differentiation or standard culture media. Allogeneic CD4+ T lymphocytes were co-cultured with undifferentiated and differentiated cells in the presence or absence of interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-1ß or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and their proliferation and apoptosis were measured. Additionally, the effects of these cytokines on the expression of immunomodulatory or pro-inflammatory factors were investigated. Our data show that osteogenic differentiation of hPDL-MSCs reduced their ability to suppress the proliferation of CD4+ T lymphocytes in the presence of IFN-γ and enhanced this ability in the presence of IL-1ß. These changes were accompanied by a slightly decreased proportion of apoptotic CD4+ in the presence of IFN-γ. The osteogenic differentiation was accompanied by decreases and increases in the activity of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase in the presence of IFN-γ and IL-1ß, respectively. The basal production of interleukin-8 by hPDL-MSCs was substantially increased upon osteogenic differentiation. In conclusion, this study suggests that pre-differentiation strategies in vitro may impact the immunomodulatory properties of hPDL-MSCs and subsequently affect their therapeutic effectiveness in vivo. These findings provide important insights for the development of MSC-based therapies.

Effects of enamel matrix derivative in nonsurgical periodontal therapy on pro-inflammatory profiles, microbial environment and clinical outcome: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) application following subgingival instrumentation of residual pockets in periodontitis patients on inflammatory host response, microbiological composition, and clinical outcome. METHODS: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, a total of 22 patients with generalized periodontitis stage III or IV presenting with ≥ 6 mm probing pocket depth (PPD) at re-evaluation after initial periodontal therapy were included. Participants were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to subgingival instrumentation with (EMD +) or without (EMD-) non-surgical EMD application into the pocket. PPD, clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque index (PI), as well as a panel of pro-inflammatory cytokines and periodontal pathogen count in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of the respective sites were evaluated at baseline (T0) and six months afterwards (T1). RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed a significant PPD reduction (EMD + 1.33 ± 1.15 mm, p < 0.001; EMD- 1.32 ± 1.01 mm, p < 0.001) as well as CAL gain (EMD + 1.13 ± 1.58 mm, p < 0.001; EMD- 0.47 ± 1.06 mm, p = 0.005) from T0 to T1. While no intergroup differences for PPD reduction were observed, CAL gain was higher in EMD + sites compared to EMD- (p = 0.009). No essential effects on cytokine expression as well as bacterial count were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Application of EMD as an adjunct to subgingival instrumentation of residual pockets yielded benefits regarding CAL gain; however, effects on PPD reduction, inflammatory cytokines, and bacterial count were negligible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04449393), registration date 26/06/2020. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the obtained results, additional non-surgical EMD application compared to subgingival instrumentation alone showed no clinically relevant effects on treatment outcome and underlying biological mechanisms.

Drilling- and withdrawing-related thermal effects of implant site preparation for ceramic and stainless steel twist drills in standardized bovine bone.

INTRODUCTION: Excessive surgical trauma is believed to be among the most important causes for early implant losses. As thermal injury to the bone is not only dependent on the amount of generated heat but also on the tissue exposure time, and the greatest temperature increase was found within the withdrawing period, the entire osteotomy procedure with the parameters contributing to thermal damage is of particular clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to investigate the thermal performance of metal-based and ceramic implant drills regarding the temperature exposure time during the whole osteotomy process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigation consisted of 240 individual preparations in total, comprising two different drilling depths (10 and 16 mm), two irrigation methods (external and without irrigation), two implant drill materials (stainless steel and zirconia), and three consecutive drill diameters per material (2.0/2.2, 2.8, and 3.5 mm) with 10 identical repetitions. Real-time multichannel temperature measurement was conducted during automated drilling procedures in standardized bovine bone specimens. RESULTS: The maximum temperature changes were highly associated with the time period of passive drill withdrawing (p ≤ 0.05), irrespective of drill material, drilling depth, or drill diameter. Statistically significant differences in temperature generation between stainless steel and ceramic drills were observed in irrigated testing sites at both drilling depths with smaller drill diameters (2.0/2.2 and 2.8 mm, p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Results of this in vitro study could demonstrate a strong association between the highest temperature increase and the passive withdrawing time period in both investigated drill materials. Considering these findings and the resulting thermal bone damage due to the whole surgical procedure, high overall temperatures in combination with a prolonged heat exposure time may impact the future osseointegration process.

Thermal effects of various drill materials during implant site preparation-Ceramic vs. stainless steel drills: A comparative in vitro study in a standardised bovine bone model.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate thermal effects of ceramic and metal implant drills during implant site preparation using a standardised bovine model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 320 automated intermittent osteotomies of 10- and 16-mm drilling depths were performed using zirconium dioxide-based and stainless steel drills. Various drill diameters (2.0/ 2.2, 2.8, 3.5, 4.2 mm ∅) and different cooling methods (without/ with external saline irrigation) were investigated at room temperature (21 ± 1°C). Temperature changes were recorded in real time using two custom-built multichannel thermoprobes in 1- and 2-mm distance to the osteotomy site. For comparisons, a linear mixed model was estimated. RESULTS: Comparing thermal effects, significantly lower temperatures could be detected with steel-based drills in various drill diameters, regardless of drilling depth or irrigation method. Recorded temperatures for metal drills of all diameters and drilling depths using external irrigation were below the defined critical temperature threshold of 47°C, whereas ceramic drills of smaller diameters reached or exceeded the harmful temperature threshold at 16-mm drilling depths, regardless of whether irrigation was applied or not. The results of this study suggest that the highest temperature changes were not found at the deepest point of the osteotomy site but were observed at subcortical and deeper layers of bone, depending on drill material, drill diameter, drilling depth and irrigation method. CONCLUSIONS: This standardised investigation revealed drill material and geometry to have a substantial impact on heat generation, as well as external irrigation, drilling depth and drill diameter.