Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turkiye Parazitol Derg ; 46(3): 167-171, 2022 09 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36094115

RESUMO

Objective: Parasitological diagnostic methods such as direct microscopy, staining examination and culture methods are frequently used in the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis). Though, nowadays, new diagnostic methods, especially DNA-based methods, are developing, enabling the simultaneous recognition of different pathogens. In our study, we evaluated whether  the choice of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in which T. vaginalis and different pathogens can be detected, is be an alternative to classical methods and to evaluate the possible coexistence of pathogens. Methods: In our study, swab samples taken during routine examination of 100 female patients who presented to Manisa Celal Bayar University and Manisa City Hospital Outpatient Clinics Obstetrics and Gynecology were evaluated. The presence of T. vaginalis was investigated in these samples by direct microscopy, Giemsa stain and culture. Besides T. vaginalis, other possible agents were also investigated by real-time multiplex PCR method. Results: At least one agent was detected in 85 (85%) of the 100 patient samples included in our study. T. vaginalis positivity was detected in 6 (6%) of the samples by parasitological diagnosis methods and in 10 (10%) of the samples by multiplex PCR. Additionally, with real-time multiplex PCR, Chlamydia trachomatis in 4 (4%), Neisseria gonorrhoeae in 3 (3%), Ureaplasma urealyticum/parvum in 68 (68%), Gardnerella vaginalis in 68 (68%) and Herpes simplex virus 1/2 in 1 (1%) of the sample positivity was found. Mycoplasma genitalium, another agent examined by multiplex PCR, was not found positive in any sample. The Kappa value of the culture that is a parasitological test and multiplex PCR for T. vaginalis showed moderate agreement with 59.5%. Conclusion: It has been concluded that using  real-time multiplex PCR method, which has  high specificity and sensitivity, in addition to microscopy and culture methods in the diagnosis of T. vaginalis, could contribute to the correct and effective treatment by detecting multiple infections.


Assuntos
Trichomonas vaginalis , Vaginite , Feminino , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Gravidez , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trichomonas vaginalis/genética
2.
Arch Rheumatol ; 34(3): 326-333, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31598599

RESUMO

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the interpretation of the antinuclear antibody (ANA)-indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test results based on the interpreter-related subjectivity and to examine the inter-center agreement rates with the performance of each laboratory. Patients and methods: The ANA-IIF testing was carried out in a total of 600 sera and evaluated by four laboratories. The inter-center agreement rates were detected. The same results given by the four centers were accepted as gold standard and the predictive values of each center were calculated. Results: The inter-center agreement was reported for ANA-IIF test results from 392 of 600 (65.3%) sera, while 154 of 392 results were positive. Four study centers reported 213 (35.5%), 222 (37.0%), 266 (44.3%), and 361 (60.2%) positive test results, respectively. In terms of the patterns, the highest and lowest positive predictive values were 72.3% and 42.7%, respectively, while the highest and lowest negative predictive values were 99.6% and 61.5%, respectively. The agreement for semi-quantitative evaluation at three levels of fluorescence intensity stated by four centers was detected in 100 sera at 87% 3(+), while the other two levels were 6% and 7%. The highest predictive value for the highest fluorescence intensity of 3(+) was found to be 71.9%. Conclusion: Significant differences may be observed among laboratories in terms of qualitative results, patterns, and semi-quantitative determination of the fluorescence intensity in the ANA-IIF testing, particularly at low fluorescence intensity levels and in those with speckled patterns. In case of any discrepancy between ANA-IIF test and clinical prediagnosis, the test should be repeated in another laboratory, if necessary.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...