Is Lenke type V adolescent idiopathic scoliosis associated with different muscular morphometry?

The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in psoas major (PM), erector spinae (ES), multifidus (MF), and rectus abdominis (RA) morphometry in Lenke type V adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and control. Forty-two Lenke V AIS patients and 30 control were enrolled. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and CSA index (CI) of the PM, ES, MF, and RA at the T9-L5 levels were measured and compared between Lenke type V patients and control. The CI of the RA was significantly higher in the control group than the Lenke V group in multiple levels. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between patients with Lenke V AIS and control regarding the CI of the RA, ES, and PM. There was no significant difference between concave and convex sides of the Lenke V group regarding the CI of the RA, PM, MF, and ES. RA muscle mass is significantly affected in Lenke type 5 AIS regardless of convex or concave sides. This difference may be related to postural differences and back pain development in Lenke type 5 patients. Level of evidence: Level III.

Anatomical Parameters Associated with the Shortening Decision in Crowe Type 4 Dysplastic Hip Osteoarthritis: A Case-Control Study.

Background: Muscle and bone morphometry may be potent indicators for predicting femoral subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (FSSO). We aimed to investigate muscular and bony factors that may be predictive of FSSO. Methods: Patients with unilateral Crowe type 4 developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) without (Group 1, 31 patients) and with FSSO (Group 2, 39 patients) were included. Sixty healthy hips (Group 3) were selected as the control group. Several muscular and bony parameters were measured on the operative (O) and non-operative (NO) hips on radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images. Results: The mean NO gluteus medius cross-sectional area (CSA) index (NO-GMed CI), NO tensor fasia lata (TFL) CI, NO iliopsoas (IP) CI, and NO gluteus maximus (GMax) CI for the control group were lower than those for both Crowe type IV DDH with and without FSSO. The mean NO gluteus minimus CI (NO-GMin CI) for the control group were higher than those for both Crowe type IV DDH with and without FSSO. There was significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 regarding axial position of neo-acetabulum (APNA) (- 0.03 ± 8.5 vs. 5.27 ± 6.33, p = 0.004), coronal position of neo-acetabulum (CPNA) (33.39 ± 10.65 vs. 53.70 ± 12.27, p = 0.000), operative leg length discrepancy (O-LLD) (14.18 ± 15.14 vs. 24.44 ± 15.80, p = 0.001), O-gluteus minimus (GMin) length (155.34 ± 157.73 vs. 106.79 ± 20, p = < 0.01), and O-GMin CI (57.28 ± 58.59 vs. 29.95 ± 12.13, p = < 0.01). The cutoff values determined by the receiving operating curve analyses were as follows: 13.7 mm, 2.5 mm, and 41.4 mm for O-LLD, APNA, and CPNA, respectively. Conclusion: FSSO is associated with APNA, CPNA, O-LLD, O-GMin length, and O-GMin CI. By using cutoff values of APNA, CPNA, and O-LLD, predicting FSSO preoperatively is possible. Owing to these parameters, it may be possible to lower the technically demanding level of surgery.

The effect of lumbar facet joint injection levels on spinopelvic parameters and functional outcome.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a very common musculoskeletal complaint that impacts patients' quality of life in numerous ways. Facet joint injection is a widely used spinal intervention to relieve back pain. Effects of facet joint injection on spinopelvic parameters and the relationship between injection levels and spinopelvic parameter changes have not been evaluated before. OBJECTIVE: To compare spinopelvic parameters before and after injections at different levels, and to evaluate the correlation between these changes and functional outcome. METHODS: 144 patients were included in the study and retrospectively grouped by injection level: Group 1 (n= 72), L4-L5 and L5-S1, and group 2 (n= 72), L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1. Pre- and post-injection Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and intervertebral angles between T12 and S1 were compared. The correlation between ODI and radiographic parameter changes was evaluated. RESULTS: The pre- to post-injection ODI change was significantly lower in group 2 (p= 0.010). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of pre- and post-injection spinopelvic parameters before and after injection (p> 0.05) except pelvic tilt (p= 0.001 and p= 0.007, respectively). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between the change in the ODI value and the change in pelvic tilt (P= 0.012, r= 0.581). CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel lumbar facet injections are clinically more effective than only two-level lower level lumbar injections. Pelvic tilt changes positively correlate with the ODI score changes.

Change of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters after Selective and Non-Selective Fusion in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

AIM: To compare the postoperative changes of both sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters in patients with Lenke Type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent selective and non-selective fusion surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study among 53 Lenke Type 1 AIS patients who underwent corrective surgery at our centre between 2006 and 2012. Patients were classified as group 1 if they underwent selective surgery and as group 2 if they underwent non-selective surgery. Surgical results of preoperative and postoperative sagittal and spinopelvic measurements, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) values were analysed using the SURGIMAP© Software (Nemaris Inc. USA) measurement system. RESULTS: In both groups, a comparison of pre- and postoperative sagittal spinal parameters did not show a statistically significant difference. In both groups, pre- and postoperative measurements of LL and TK did not show a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: After selective and non-selective surgery, sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters are not affected in the middle term. We think that the long-term studies to be done in this regard will increasingly require the necessity of keeping the pelvis in mind while evaluating the sagittal plan in AIS surgery.