Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prostate Int ; 10(4): 218-223, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36570650

RESUMO

Purpose: Questionnaire forms (QFs) are used in the evaluation of all patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs). Our study aims to investigate the compatibility of the three QFs with each other and to investigate the relationship between education level and complete completion of these forms. Materials and methods: A total of 224 patients between February 2018 and February 2019 were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups as primary, intermediate, and advanced according to their education level and the patients who gave incomplete answers to the questions were determined. Results: The mean age of the patients was 61.0 ± 7.57(45-85), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) value was 16.2 ± 8.3(1-35), the international incontinence form-male lower urinary tract symptoms (ICIQ-MLUTS) value was 16.5 ± 7.9(0-38), the visual prostate symptom score (VPSS) value was 9.9 ± 3.0(3-16). There was a significant correlation between the three QFs (P < 0.05). The correlation between IPSS and ICIQ-MLUTS was strong (r = 0.745). The incomplete response rate was 32.1% (n = 72) in ICIQ-MLUTS, 16.5% (n = 37) in VPSS, and 10.7% (n = 24) in IPSS (P < 0.05). The incomplete response rate was not affected by education. The rate of patients who could be questioned with ICIQ-MLUTS but not with the other two QFs varied between 12.9% and 85.2%, depending on the symptoms. Conclusions: Each QF has its advantages and disadvantages. The strong correlation between IPSS and ICIQ-MLUTS found in our study indicates that these tools can be used interchangeably in daily clinical practice. ICIQ-MLUTS can evaluate symptoms that are not present in other QFs. In the evaluation of illiterate patients, VPSS should be used without any alternative.

2.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 23(1): 35-42, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31065207

RESUMO

The major extracellular electrolytes, sodium, and potassium are often requested together and form a large percentage of the requested tests in routine clinical chemistry laboratories. Two types of devices that use direct and indirect ion-selective electrode (ISE) methods are used in hospitals for electrolyte measurements: blood gas analyzers (BGA), which use direct ISE technology, and the indirect ISE method, which is often used in a central-laboratory autoanalyzer (AA). We aimed to summarize the current scientific knowledge based on whether the electrolyte test results, using Na and K test results obtained with BGA and an AA, can be used interchangeably. We searched Medline (PubMed), Google Scholar, and Web of Science up to 31st March 2018. In addition, references of the included studies were also examined. Fourteen studies with a risk of bias were included in the analysis. Limits of agreement differences were variable among BGA and AA sodium and potassium test results in clinical practice. The results of both BGA and AA measures should not be used interchangeably under the assumption that they are equivalent to each other. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Ustundag Y, Huysal K, Ozgunay SE, Turkoglu AR. Interchangeability of Sodium and Potassium Result Values of Arterial Blood Gas with Laboratory Analyzer: Narrative Review. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, January 2019;23(1):35-42.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...