Fludarabine and cytarabine as a sequential infusion regimen for treatment of adults with recurrent, refractory or poor prognosis acute leukemia.

We did a retrospective analysis on the safety and efficacy of sequential infusion fludarabine and cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) in treating refractory, recurrent or poor prognosis acute leukemia in adult patients. Forty-five adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) received a total of 68 courses of sequential continuous infusion of fludarabine for 2 days (total dose 71.5 mg/m(2) ) followed by 3 days of ara-C (total dose 7590 mg/m(2) ). Thirty-nine patients had refractory or recurrent disease, and six had other adverse prognostic features. Thirty-six patients had AML, seven had ALL, and two had CML in blastic phase. Complete remission was seen in 20 patients (44%), and partial remission in 5 patients (11%), giving a total response rate of 56%, similar for both AML and ALL. Duration of response to prior therapy did not affect the response rate. All 3 patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL obtained complete remission. Median remission duration was 4.7 months (range 0.6-36.6), and median overall survival was 5.0 months (0.7-40+). Median overall survival was 10.1 months in responders. Pulmonary toxicity was seen in 8 patients, of whom 2 died from adult respiratory distress syndrome. No cardiac toxicity was observed, but 3 patients had transient cerebellar toxicity. Profound myelosuppression was seen in all patients. We conclude that the sequential infusion of fludarabine and ara-C is an effective non-cardiotoxic regimen for adults with refractory, recurrent or poor prognosis acute leukemia, may be particularly useful for resistant Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL, and may warrant further investigation in this subset. Pulmonary rather than neurological toxicity may be a unique side effect of the regimen.

Adverse effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I in obese insulin-resistant type II diabetic patients.

Data from studies in diabetic rodents and evidence from clinical situations of severe resistance to insulin suggest that insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is able to at least partly overcome insulin resistance. To assess the efficacy of recombinant human IGF-I in subjects with the most common form of insulin resistance, e.g., obese, type II diabetic patients, we administered recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF) in doses of 120 and 160 micrograms/kg twice daily for 4-52 days to seven such individuals who had been treated previously with high doses of insulin (> 0.7 U.kg-1 x day-1). Four patients exhibited comparable or enhanced, whereas three had diminished, blood glucose control on rhIGF-I relative to that while on twice daily NPH insulin during the six-week control period. The occurrence of adverse effects in all patients compelled us to discontinue rhIGF-I administration before completing the 8-week treatment period. These adverse effects included edema primarily on the face and hands, mild weight gain, occasional dyspnea, bilateral jaw tenderness, arthralgias and myalgias, fatigue, tachycardia, flushing, orthostatic hypotension, and local burning at the injection site. We conclude that the frequency and severity of side effects associated with administering high-dose subcutaneous rhIGF-I to obese insulin-resistant diabetic patients make it an unacceptable therapeutic agent for these patients despite its ability to produce reasonable blood glucose control in approximately 50% of them.

Short-term effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on metabolic control of patients with type II diabetes mellitus.

Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) lowers blood glucose, serum insulin, C-peptide, and lipid levels in healthy and diabetic animals and humans. We hypothesized that rhIGF-I might control blood glucose levels and concomitantly reduce pancreatic insulin secretion in patients with type II diabetes. If true, rhIGF-I might serve as a therapeutic agent that could mitigate some of the detrimental effects of hyperinsulinemia secondary to insulin resistance in these patients. In this study, we treated 12 patients with type II diabetes mellitus twice daily for 5 days with sc rhIGF-I in doses of 90, 120, or 160 micrograms/kg body weight. Metabolic parameters in the fasting and postprandial states were assessed during a 3-day baseline period, the rhIGF-I treatment period, and a 3-day follow-up period, respectively. Administration of rhIGF-I significantly reduced mean (+/- SD) concentrations of fasting blood glucose (12.3 +/- 4.5 to 9.1 +/- 2.6 mmol/L), serum insulin (98 +/- 52 to 56 +/- 27 pmol/L), and C-peptide (993 +/- 298 to 728 +/- 232 pmol/L). It also decreased postprandial (area under the curve) blood glucose (32.5 +/- 12.7 to 23.9 +/- 8.1 mmol/L.h), serum insulin (1102 +/- 707 to 467 +/- 332 pmol/L.h), and C-peptide (5958 +/- 2747 to 3442 +/- 1523 pmol/L.h). The administration of rhIGF-I was also associated with a small but significant reduction in serum triglycerides (6.76 +/- 3.45 to 5.32 +/- 2.59 mmol/L) and total cholesterol (6.13 +/- 1.25 to 5.66 +/- 1.20 mmol/L), 24-h creatinine clearance increased significantly (85 +/- 30 to 133 +/- 51 mL/min), and microalbuminuria was unchanged. Although rhIGF-I was reasonably well tolerated, side effects included low-grade edema, mild and mainly asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension, and bilateral temporomandibular tenderness. We conclude that short-term treatment of type II diabetic patients with rhIGF-I favorably affects metabolic control and enhances kidney function. An assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of rhIGF-I administration to this group of patients awaits extended experiments.