Enhancing the emergency general surgical service: an example of the aggregation of marginal gains.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to enhance the emergency general surgical service in our high-volume centre in order to reduce four-hour target breaches, to expedite senior decision making and to avoid unnecessary admissions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aggregation of marginal gains theory was applied. A dual consultant on-call system was established by the incremental employment of five emergency general surgeons with a specialist interest in colorectal or oesophagogastric surgery. A surgical ambulatory care unit, which combines consultant-led clinical review with dedicated next-day radiology slots, and a dedicated working week half-day gastrointestinal urgent theatre session were instituted to facilitate ambulatory care pathways. RESULTS: The presence of two consultant surgeons being on call during weekday working hours decreased the four-hour target breaches and allowed consultant presence in the surgical ambulatory care clinic and the gastrointestinal urgent theatre list. Of 1371 surgical ambulatory care clinic appointments within 30 months, 1135 (82.7%) avoided a hospital admission, corresponding to savings of £309,752 . The coordinated functioning of the surgical ambulatory care clinic and the gastrointestinal urgent theatre list resulted in statistically significantly reduced hospital stays for patients operated for abscess drainage (gastrointestinal urgent theatre median 11 hours (interquartile range 3, 38) compared with emergency median 31 hours (interquartile range 24, 53), P < 0.001) or diagnostic laparoscopy/appendicectomy (gastrointestinal urgent theatre median 52 hours (interquartile range 41, 71) compared with emergency median 61 hours (interquartile range 43, 99), P = 0.005). Overnight surgery was reduced with only surgery that was absolutely necessary occurring out of hours. CONCLUSION: The expansion of the 'traditional' on-call surgical team, the establishment of the surgical ambulatory care clinic and the gastrointestinal urgent theatre list led to marginal gains with a reduction in unnecessary inpatient stays, expedited decision making and improved financial efficiency.

Apical node metastasis independently predicts poor survival in Dukes C colorectal cancer.

AIM: The prognostic significance of apical node metastasis in node-positive colorectal cancer (CRC) is disregarded by the Fourth American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM classification system. The influence of apical node metastases on overall 5-year survival among patients with Dukes stage C CRC was examined. METHOD: Patients who underwent operative resection for CRC between 1999 and 2003 were reviewed. RESULTS: Two-hundred and ninety patients were included in the study, including 203 with Dukes C apical node-negative cancers, 39 with Dukes C apical node-positive cancers and 48 with Dukes D cancers. The respective prevalence of extramural vascular invasion was 35%vs 64%vs 56% (P = 0.0005), T4-stage 24%vs 38%vs 48% (P = 0.013), positive resection margin 16%vs 41%vs 23% (P = 0.001), more than three positive nodes harvested 28%vs 85%vs 52% (P < 0.0001) and poorer tumour differentiation grade 9%vs 21%vs 23% (P = 0.009). Multivariate analyses of all Dukes C cancer patients (n = 242) showed a positive apical node to be a highly significant independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 2.281, 95% confidence interval 1.421-3.662, P = 0.0006). Extramural vascular invasion and a positive resection margin were also independent predictors of poor survival. Patients with Dukes C apical node-positive cancers had a significantly poorer overall 5-year survival compared to patients with Dukes C apical node-negative cancers (P < 0.0001) but survival was not significantly different compared to patients with distant metastases at initial presentation (P = 0.504). CONCLUSION: Apical node metastasis appears to be a strong independent, negative prognostic factor of poor survival in Dukes C CRC.

The impact of lymph node yield on Duke's B and C colorectal cancer survival.

AIM: The number of positive lymph nodes retrieved following colorectal cancer (CRC) resection impacts on the staging and further treatment of the disease. We compared 5-year survival by lymph node yield for Duke's B and C patients to assess the impact on prognosis. METHOD: A retrospective methodology was employed to review patients who underwent operative resection for Duke's B or C CRC between 1999 and 2003. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were included in our analyses. Lymph node yield, N-stage and extramural vascular invasion were independent predictors of overall 5-year survival. A significant difference in 5-year survival by lymph node yield was seen among Duke's B patients (< 9 nodes vs ≥ 9 nodes, 45.2%vs 68.4%; P = 0.0043) and Duke's C patients (< 10 nodes vs ≥ 10 nodes, 25.6%vs 48.8%; P = 0.0099). There was a significant reduction in the relative risk of 2.8% in mortality for each additional node sampled in Duke's B and C patients (RR 0.972, 95% confidence interval 0.949-0.994, P = 0.0102). Duke's B patients who had < 9 lymph node yield and no neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment had a similar survival to all Duke's C patients (47.8%vs 41.7%, P = 0.5136). CONCLUSION: Lymph node yield independently predicts for survival in patients with Duke's B and C CRC. Duke's B patients with < 9 lymph node yield have no better survival than patients with Duke's C disease. Therefore, prospective randomized studies are required to examine if inadequate lymph node yield could be one of the deciding factors in offering adjuvant therapy among Duke's B cancer patients.

Screening for rectal cancer: will it improve cure rates?

Here we give an overview of colorectal cancer screening strategies with an emphasis on the diagnosis and management of rectal cancer. We review the published studies on screening in the high-risk population, including patients with a history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and inherited conditions. In the average-risk population, the evidence base for a number of screening strategies is evaluated, including endoscopy, contrast studies and faecal occult blood testing. Screening guidelines in the high-risk population are predominantly based on case-control studies comparing the incidence of colorectal cancer in screened and control groups. Screening the average-risk population for colorectal cancer reduces cancer-specific mortality by 15% after biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing and 50-80% after flexible sigmoidoscopy. All of the screening strategies outlined have a greater sensitivity for distal lesions than proximal lesions.

Small, flat colorectal cancers in the UK population: an analysis of resected specimens.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the prevalence of small, flat carcinomas in surgically resected colon. To determine whether tumour morphology influences stage at presentation. METHOD: 1763 surgically resected colorectal cancers from one UK centre excised between 1995 and 2004 were examined. Age 69 years, (42-90), M:F equal. Sixty-one tumours < or =20 mm across were identified. Slides were reviewed by a consultant histopathologist and classified using Japanese Research Society Classification, JRSC and TNM staging. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis. RESULTS: In 61 small cancers, 64% (39/61) showed flat morphology and 33% (20/61) polypoid. Two lesions were unclassifiable. Prevalence was 2.2% of all resected colorectal cancers. More T1 tumours at presentation were polypoid, (30% vs. 8%; P = 0.033). T3 tumours were more likely to be flat than polypoid, (49% vs. 20%; P = 0.016). Infiltration into musclaris mucosa occurred in 77% (30/39) flat tumours. Rates of metastases were high in both groups, (30% polypoid vs. 39% flat, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of small, flat cancers in resected specimens in the UK concurs with that of Japanese studies. Small, flat cancers should be staged carefully because of high rates of T3/4 disease. The results support the theory of accelerated carcinogenesis in flat cancers.