Preoperative Mapping of the Supplementary Motor Area in Patients with Brain Tumor Using Resting-State fMRI with Seed-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The supplementary motor area can be a critical region in the preoperative planning of patients undergoing brain tumor resection because it plays a role in both language and motor function. While primary motor regions have been successfully identified using resting-state fMRI, there is variability in the literature regarding the identification of the supplementary motor area for preoperative planning. The purpose of our study was to compare resting-state fMRI to task-based fMRI for localization of the supplementary motor area in a large cohort of patients with brain tumors presenting for preoperative brain mapping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with brain tumors were evaluated with resting-state fMRI using seed-based analysis of hand and orofacial motor regions. Rates of supplementary motor area localization were compared with those in healthy controls and with localization results by task-based fMRI. RESULTS: Localization of the supplementary motor area using hand motor seed regions was more effective than seeding using orofacial motor regions for both patients with brain tumor (95.5% versus 34.8%, P < .001) and controls (95.2% versus 45.2%, P < .001). Bilateral hand motor seeding was superior to unilateral hand motor seeding in patients with brain tumor for either side (95.5% versus 75.8%/75.8% for right/left, P < .001). No difference was found in the ability to identify the supplementary motor area between patients with brain tumors and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to task-based fMRI, seed-based analysis of resting-state fMRI represents an equally effective method for supplementary motor area localization in patients with brain tumors, with the best results obtained with bilateral hand motor region seeding.

Comparison of spin-echo and gradient-echo T1-weighted and spin-echo T2-weighted images at 3T in evaluating term-neonatal myelination.

SUMMARY: A prior clinical report of 3T MR imaging in subsequently healthy very premature neonates imaged at term-equivalent age found that both gradient recalled-echo-T1WI and spin-echo-T2WI showed higher rates of myelinated structures, compared with spin-echo-T1WI. The current study set out to assess those rates on the same sequences at 3T in term neonates and thus consisted of 16 term neonates with normal-appearing MR imaging findings who subsequently had normal findings at clinical follow-up. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed 19 structures in those infants on all 3 sequences. Gradient recalled-echo-T1WI showed a slightly higher rate of myelination (57.2%-72.4% of all structures) and interobserver agreement (κ = 0.546, P < .0001) than spin-echo-T2WI (58.2%-64.8%; κ = 0.468, P < .0001), while spin-echo-T1WI had the lowest myelination rate and agreement (25.0%-48.4%; κ = 0.384, P < .0001). Both observers noted that the following structures were myelinated in 88%-100% of patients on gradient recalled-echo-T1WI: the brachium of the inferior colliculus, decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle, habenular commissure, medial lemniscus, pyramidal decussation, posterior limb of the internal capsule, and superior cerebellar peduncle; on spin-echo-T2WI, there was myelination in 88%-100% of the following structures: the brachium of the inferior colliculus, decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle, inferior cerebellar peduncle, medial lemniscus, and posterior limb of the internal capsule. In conclusion, this study confirmed that similar to the findings in term-equivalent-age premature infants, myelination changes in term neonates may be best assessed on both gradient recalled-echo-T1WI and spin-echo-T2WI at 3T, and not on spin-echo-T1WI.