The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.

Background: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a multiparametric tool for objectively measuring the general acoustic characteristics of voice. The AVQI uses both sustained vowel and continuous speech in its analysis, and therefore, a validation is required for different languages. In the present study, validation was performed in the Finnish-speaking population.Methods: The study included 200 native Finnish-speaking participants of whom 115 were voice patients attending a phoniatric clinic, and the remaining 85 subjects participated in the study as healthy controls. Voice samples were recorded, and the auditory evaluation was performed by five speech therapists. An ordinal four-point interval scale was used to evaluate the degree of voice abnormality (Grade, G). Several statistical analyses were performed to test the validity and the diagnostic accuracy of the AVQI in the Finnish-speaking population.Results: The inter-rater reliability of four of the five raters was high enough to allow the use of Gmean in the validation. There was a statistically significant correlation between the AVQI scores and the evaluation of overall perceptual voice quality (r = 0.74).Conclusions: The results confirmed the good discriminatory power of the AVQI in differentiating between normal and abnormal voice qualities. The AVQI 02.02 threshold value for dysphonia was 2.87 in the Finnish-speaking population.

How Much Loading Does Water Resistance Voice Therapy Impose on the Vocal Folds? An Experimental Human Study.

OBJECTIVES: Water resistance voice therapy applies phonation into water through a tube. This study investigates how strenuous this therapy can be for the vocal folds in terms of impact stress (IS). It further examines whether it is possible to estimate the IS using the contact quotient (CQ) and maximum derivative from an electroglottogram (EGG). STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: A male participant sustained a rounded back vowel [u:] or [o:] at a comfortable speaking pitch and loudness, and phonated into a silicone "Lax Vox" tube submerged 2 cm in water. High-speed videolaryngoscopy was performed with a rigid scope. Oral air pressure (Poral) was registered in a mouthpiece through which an endoscope was inserted into the larynx. An EGG was recorded. RESULTS: The CQEGG from the EGG and the closed quotient from the glottal width (CQarea) increased, while the maximum glottal amplitude and absolute value of derivative minimum (dmin) and also the derivative maximum from the EGG decreased for phonation into water. Normalized amplitude quotient from the glottal width variation also decreased but the change was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the glottal area findings, water resistance therapy does not seem to increase vocal fold loading (in terms of increased IS) even if the increase of CQarea, and CQEGG suggest so. CQEGG may qualitatively correspond to that of area, but the reliability of CQ (from the glottal area or the EGG) and the maximum derivative from the EGG as estimates of IS in semiocclusion exercises warrant further studies.

Resonance Tube or Lax Vox?

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the flow resistance of Resonance tube (RT) and Lax Vox tube (LVT) when submerged 2 cm and 10 cm in water, as well as phonation into the tubes in these conditions. METHODS: In the in vitro experiment, the air pressure for flow rates of 60-600 mL/s was measured at the tube inlet, when the outer end of the tube was submerged 2 cm and 10 cm below water surface in 30°, 45°, and 90° angle. In the in vivo experiment, 14 subjects phonated in habitual loudness and loudly into both tubes, with the outer end 2 cm and 10 cm in water. RT was immersed in a 45° angle and LVT in a 90° angle in water. Oral pressure, contact quotient from electroglottographic signal, and sound pressure level were studied. Sensations during phonation were reported in an interview. RESULTS: Flow resistance was slightly lower with LVT than with RT, and slightly lower for smaller immersion angles. In habitual loudness, transglottic pressure and frequency of oral pressure variation were lower for LVT phonation and amplitude of oral pressure variation was higher for LVT 2 cm in water. Some subjects preferred RT, whereas others preferred LVT or reported no differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: The tubes differed slightly in flow resistance. Higher oral pressure oscillation with LVT 2 cm in water may offer stronger massage effect on vocal folds.

How Stressful Is "Deep Bubbling"?

OBJECTIVES: Water resistance therapy by phonating through a tube into the water is used to treat dysphonia. Deep submersion (≥10 cm in water, "deep bubbling") is used for hypofunctional voice disorders. Using it with caution is recommended to avoid vocal overloading. This experimental study aimed to investigate how strenuous "deep bubbling" is. STUDY DESIGN: Fourteen subjects, half of them with voice training, repeated the syllable [pa:] in comfortable speaking pitch and loudness, loudly, and in strained voice. Thereafter, they phonated a vowel-like sound both in comfortable loudness and loudly into a glass resonance tube immersed 10 cm into the water. METHODS: Oral pressure, contact quotient (CQ, calculated from electroglottographic signal), and sound pressure level were studied. The peak oral pressure P(oral) during [p] and shuttering of the outer end of the tube was measured to estimate the subglottic pressure P(sub) and the mean P(oral) during vowel portions to enable calculation of transglottic pressure P(trans). Sensations during phonation were reported with an open-ended interview. RESULTS: P(sub) and P(oral) were higher in "deep bubbling" and P(trans) lower than in loud syllable phonation, but the CQ did not differ significantly. Similar results were obtained for the comparison between loud "deep bubbling" and strained phonation, although P(sub) did not differ significantly. Most of the subjects reported "deep bubbling" to be stressful only for respiratory and lip muscles. No big differences were found between trained and untrained subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The CQ values suggest that "deep bubbling" may increase vocal fold loading. Further studies should address impact stress during water resistance exercises.

Vocal Fatigue Symptoms and Laryngeal Status in Relation to Vocal Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to investigate the vocal fatigue symptoms and laryngeal status in relation to vocal activity limitations and vocal participation restrictions. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case-control study. METHODS: Two hundred six teachers were divided into two groups based on the frequency of their self-reported vocal symptoms being more or less than the mean of reported frequency. The study compared odds for activity limitation and participation restriction in relation to frequency of vocal symptoms, number of vocal symptoms recurring weekly, and organic laryngeal changes. Activity limitation and participation restriction were studied using the Voice Activity and Participation Profile questionnaire. RESULTS: Increased odds were found for teachers with frequent vocal symptoms and especially those with one or more vocal symptom recurring weekly. Odds were found to be 2.6-8.5 times more likely in teachers with more frequent vocal symptoms. The odds increased dramatically with increase of the number of vocal symptoms recurring weekly. Laryngeal organic changes were found to increase the odds but insignificantly. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers with frequent vocal symptoms, especially those with vocal symptoms recurring weekly, have increased odds ratio for vocal activity limitation and vocal participation restrictions. High scores or frequent occurrence of self-reported vocal fatigue symptoms must be taken seriously in the evaluation of vocal working ability.

Relationships between self-evaluations of voice and working conditions, background factors, and phoniatric findings in female teachers.

Self-evaluations of voice, working conditions, and results of phoniatric examination were studied in 78 female primary school teachers. Most teachers evaluated their vocal capabilities as 'normal'; nevertheless 1/3 reported two or more weekly symptoms. Unsatisfactory air quality, background noise, and stressful working conditions were seen as the most harmful environmental factors. A total of 14% of the subjects had organic laryngeal changes, 37% had mild changes, and 49% were found to be healthy. These findings did not correlate with self-evaluation of voice, vocal symptoms, or voice-related quality of life. Teaching experience or teaching hours per week did not correlate with laryngeal findings or symptoms. The results illustrate the complex nature of voice assessment and the need of assessment tools specially suited for functionally healthy voice professionals.

Immediate effects of 'voice massage' treatment on the speaking voice of healthy subjects.

'Voice massage' (VM) treatment includes manipulation of muscles related to speech production and voice and breathing exercises. This study investigated the effects of VM in 10 healthy subjects (5 females, 5 males). They recorded repetitions of the word 'paappa' at normal loudness and as softly as possible and read a text sample before and after 1-hour (1) VM treatment, (2) fast walking, (3) sitting in a library and (4) lying on a bed. Subglottic pressure was estimated from oral pressure during [p]. Transglottal flow and glottal resistance were measured. Voice production was studied with electroglottography. Fundamental frequency, sound pressure level (SPL) and alpha ratio [(SPL of the range 1-5 kHz) - (SPL of the range 50 Hz-1 kHz)] were calculated from text samples, which were also evaluated by 7 voice experts. A questionnaire was used to record subjects' sensations. Changes after lying and sitting suggest lowered effort in phonatory muscles, while after fast walking effort seemed to increase. After VM no significant changes were observed in voice parameters or perceptual quality, but ease of phonation and reduced tension in the neck, shoulders and back were reported. The effects of VM may be partly psychological, partly related to a search of phonatory balance.