Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Virol ; 151(2): 327-46, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16172842

RESUMO

The subgenomic (SG) mRNA of rubella virus (RUB) contains the structural protein open reading frame (SP-ORF) that is translated to produce the three virion structural proteins: capsid (C) and glycoproteins E2 and E1. RUB expression vectors have been developed that express heterologous genes from the SG RNA, including replicons which replace the SP-ORF with a heterologous gene, and these expression vectors are candidate vaccine vectors. In the related alphaviruses, translational enhancing elements have been identified in both the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the SG RNA and the N-terminal region of the C gene. To optimize expression from RUB vectors, both the 5'UTR of the SG RNA and the C gene were surveyed for translational enhancing elements using both plasmids and replicons expressing reporter genes from the SG RNA. In replicons, the entire 5'UTR was necessary for translation; interestingly, when plasmids were used the 5'UTR was dispensable for optimal translation. The RUB C gene contains a predicted long stem-loop starting 62 nts downstream from the initiation codon (SLL) that has a structure and stability similar to SL's found in the C genes of two alphaviruses, Sindbis virus (SIN) and Semliki Forest virus, that have been shown to enhance translation of the SG RNA in infected cells. However, a series of fusions of various lengths of the N-terminus of the RUB C protein with reporter genes showed that the SLL had an attenuating effect on translation that was overcome by mutagenesis that destabilized the SLL or by adding downstream sequences of the C gene to the fusion. Thus, for optimal expression efficiency from RUB expression vectors, only the 5'UTR of the SG RNA is required. Further investigation of the differing effects of the SLL on RUB and alphavirus SG RNA translation revealed that the SIN and RUB SLLs could enhance translation when expressed from a SIN cytopathic replicon, but not when expressed from a plasmid, a RUB replicon, or a SIN noncytopathic replicon. Thus, the SLL only functions in a "cytopathic environment" in which cell translation has been altered.


Assuntos
Genoma Viral , Biossíntese de Proteínas/genética , RNA Viral/metabolismo , Elementos de Resposta/genética , Vírus da Rubéola/genética , Vírus da Rubéola/metabolismo , Animais , Chlorocebus aethiops , RNA Viral/genética , Transcrição Gênica , Células Vero
2.
Virology ; 289(1): 63-73, 2001 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11601918

RESUMO

A rubella virus (RUB) replicon was constructed by replacing the 3' proximal structural protein ORF (SP-ORF) in Robo402, a RUB infectious cDNA clone, with a reporter gene, green fluorescent protein (GFP). This replicon, RUBrep/GFP, mimics naturally occurring RUB defective-interfering (DI) RNAs generated during serial undiluted passage that maintain the 5' proximal nonstructural protein ORF (NS-ORF) but contain deletions in the SP-ORF. Following transfection of Vero cells with in vitro RNA transcripts from RUBrep/GFP, replicon replication occurred and the replicon was amplified and spread to other cells in the presence of standard helper virus. GFP expression was a much more sensitive indicator of replicon replication than was Northern analysis to detect replicon-specific RNAs. Most of a series of RUBrep/GFP constructs with deletions in the NS-ORF not only were incapable of self-replication, but were not amplified by standard helper virus. The only exception was a construct with an in-frame deletion between two NotI sites that removed nucleotides 1685-2192 of the genome; this construct did not express GFP by itself, but did express GFP in the presence of standard helper RUB and was spread to other cells. Thus, with the exception of this region, the NS-ORF is required in cis for amplification of RUB replicons by standard helper virus, explaining the selection of DI RNAs that maintain the NS-ORF. Surprisingly, when the NotI deletion was introduced into Robo402, a viable virus resulted that replicated only threefold less efficiently than did Robo402 virus. Thus, the NotI region of the NS-ORF is not necessary for virus replication. This deletion covers a region of the NS-ORF without predicted function, which therefore may function as a spacer or hinge between functional domains. Nevertheless, it was an unexpected finding that a small virus such as RUB could dispense with approximately 10% of its genome.


Assuntos
Vírus Defeituosos/genética , Vetores Genéticos , RNA Viral/genética , Replicon/genética , Vírus da Rubéola/genética , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/metabolismo , Animais , Chlorocebus aethiops , Amplificação de Genes , Deleção de Genes , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde , Vírus Auxiliares/genética , Vírus Auxiliares/fisiologia , Proteínas Luminescentes/genética , Proteínas Luminescentes/metabolismo , RNA Viral/biossíntese , Vírus da Rubéola/fisiologia , Transcrição Gênica , Transfecção , Células Vero , Interferência Viral , Replicação Viral
3.
J Virol ; 74(22): 10811-5, 2000 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11044128

RESUMO

Rubella virus (RUB) is a small plus-strand RNA virus classified in the Rubivirus genus of the family Togaviridae. Live, attenuated RUB vaccines have been successfully used in vaccination programs for over 25 years, making RUB an attractive vaccine vector. In this study, such a vector was constructed using a recently developed RUB infectious cDNA clone (Robo). Using a standard strategy employed to produce expression and vaccine vectors with other togaviruses, the subgenomic promoter was duplicated to produce a recombinant construct (termed dsRobo) that expressed reporter genes such as chloramphenicol acetyltransferase and green fluorescent protein (GFP) under control of the second subgenomic promoter. However, expression of the reporter genes, as exemplified by GFP expression by dsRobo/GFP virus, was unstable during passaging, apparently due to homologous recombination between the subgenomic promoters leading to deletion of the GFP gene. To improve the stability of the vector, the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of a picornavirus, encephalomyocarditis virus, was used instead of the second subgenomic promoter to eliminate homology. Construction was initiated by first replacing the subgenomic promoter in the parent Robo infectious clone with the IRES. Surprisingly, viable virus resulted; this virus did not synthesize a subgenomic RNA. The subgenomic promoter was then reintroduced in an orientation such that a single subgenomic RNA was produced, GFP was the initial gene on this RNA, while the RUB structural protein open reading frame was downstream and under control of the IRES element. GFP expression by this vector was significantly improved in comparison to dsRobo/GFP. This strategy should be applicable to increase the stability of other togavirus vectors.


Assuntos
Expressão Gênica , Vetores Genéticos , Vacina contra Rubéola/genética , Animais , Cloranfenicol O-Acetiltransferase/genética , Cloranfenicol O-Acetiltransferase/metabolismo , Chlorocebus aethiops , DNA Complementar/genética , Vírus da Encefalomiocardite/genética , Vírus da Encefalomiocardite/metabolismo , Genes Reporter , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde , Humanos , Proteínas Luminescentes/genética , Proteínas Luminescentes/metabolismo , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Ribossomos/metabolismo , Vírus da Rubéola/genética , Vírus da Rubéola/metabolismo , Células Vero
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...