The comparison of calcium hydroxide + biostimulation, calcium hydroxide, formocresol, and MTA pulpotomies without biostimulation in primary teeth: 12-months clinical and radiographic follow-up.

This study has aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success rates of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy (CH) with biostimulation (PBMT) and compare them to that of CH, formocresol (FC), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies without PBMT in primary molars. A total of 172 pulpotomies were performed on primary first or second mandibular molars in 94 children who were 5-8 years old. The pulpotomy procedure was performed with four different techniques. In the PBMT group, before the CH placement, 820-nm diode laser radiation was applied to each pulp-stump for 12 s (10 mW, 2.5 J/cm2). The clinical (lack of spontaneous pain, abscess or fistula, and pathological mobility) and radiographic success (lack of periapical/furcal lesions and internal/external resorption) were recorded at 6 and 12 months. The data was statistically evaluated. p value < 0.05 was considered as significant. After 12 months, the clinical and radiographic success rate (a tooth with at least one of the findings was considered unsuccessful) was 97%/92% for FC and 97%/95%, 87%/73%, and 71%/45% for MTA, CH + PBMT, and CH, respectively. There was no significant difference between the CH + PBMT and the other groups in clinical success, while a significant difference was found between CH and FC, MTA groups. In radiographic success, there was a significant difference between the CH and the other groups. No significant difference was found between the 6th- and 12th-month results in clinical success for all the groups. A decrease in success over time was seen only in the CH group for radiographic results. CH without PBMT showed the worst clinical and radiographic results among the groups. CH + PBMT showed similar clinical success compared to the MTA and FC groups. In radiographic success, CH + PBMT showed higher success compared to CH, but this success was not high as compared to MTA and FC.

Effects of low level laser therapy on injection pain and anesthesia efficacy during local anesthesia in children: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of low level laser therapy (LLLT) to reduce injection pain associated with dental local anesthesia is reported in a limited number of studies in adults, but research on the effects of LLLT in children is needed. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of topical anesthesia + LLLT on injection pain, anesthesia efficacy, and duration in local anesthesia of children who are undergoing pulpotomy treatment. DESIGN: The study was conducted as a randomized, controlled-crossover, double-blind clinical trial with 60 children aged 6-9 years. Before local infiltration anesthesia was administered, only topical anesthesia was applied in one side (control group/CG), and topical anesthesia plus LLLT (a diode laser: 810 nm; continuous mode; 0.3W; 20 s; 69 J/cm2 ) was applied in the contralateral side (LG) as pre-anesthesia. The injection pain and anesthesia efficacy were evaluated subjectively and objectively using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (PRS) and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale respectively. Data were analyzed for statistical significance (p < .05). RESULTS: The "no pain" and "severe pain" rates in the PRS were 41.7% and 3.3% for the LG and 21.7% and 11.7% for the CG, respectively, during injection. Similarly, in the FLACC data, the number of "no pain" responses was higher for the LG than the CG (40%, 33.3%) and no "severe pain" rate was observed in both groups. The only statistically significant difference found for the PRS was p < .05. The median pain score was "0" for the LG and the CG in the FLACC data for the evaluation of anesthesia efficacy, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of pain and anesthesia duration (p > .05). Also, most of the children preferred injection with topical anesthesia + LLLT (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: It has been determined that the application of topical anesthesia + LLLT with an 810-nm diode laser before local infiltration anesthesia reduced injection pain and did not have an effect on anesthesia efficacy and duration in children.