RESUMO
Background: As the second-line chemotherapy for stage IV recurrent or nonresectable colorectal cancer, our hospital started a modified treatment regimen comprising of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) [tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1)] plus molecular targeting agents (MTAs), i.e., an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor such as panitumumab (P-mab) or cetuximab (C-mab) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor such as bevacizumab (B-mab) since October 2012. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this modified regimen. Methods: This retrospective study included 41 patients with advanced recurrent colorectal cancer at our hospital whom at least 3 courses of chemotherapy were conducted from January 2015 to December 2021. Based on the location of the primary tumor, patients were classified into two group (right-sided group, proximal to the splenic curve, and left-sided, distal to the splenic curve). We assessed archived data on RAS and BRAF status and UGT1A1 polymorphisms and use of the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (B-mab) and the EGFR inhibitors panitumumab (P-mab) and cetuximab (C-mab). In addition, progression-free survival rate (36M-PFS) and the overall survival rate (36M-OS) were calculated. Furthermore, the respective median survival time (MST), the median number of treatment courses; the objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed as well. Results: There were 11 patients (26.8%) in the right-sided group, and 30 patients (73.2%) in the left-sided group. There were 19 patients with RAS wild type (46.3%) (1 in the right sided group and 18 in the left sided group). P-mab was used for 16 of these patients (84.2%), C-mab for 2 (10.5%), and B-mab for 1 (5.3%); the remaining 22 patients (53.7%). Ten patients in the right group and 12 patients in the left group were a mutated type and received B-mab. BRAF testing was performed in 17 patients (41.5%); as more than 50% of patients (58.5%) were included before the assay's introduction. Five patients in the right-sided group and 12 patients in the left-sided group had wild type. There was no mutated type. UGT1A1 polymorphism was tested in 16/41 patients: Eight were wild type (8/41 patients, 19.5%) and 8, mutated type. Regarding the *6/*28 double heterozygous type, there was only 1 patient in the right-sided group and the remaining 7 patients were in the left-sided group. The total number of chemotherapy courses was 299, and the median number, 6.0 (range, 3-20). PFS, OS, and MST were as follows: 36M-PFS (total/Rt/Lt), 6.2%/0.0%/8.5% (MST; 7.6/6.3/8.9 months); and 36M-OS (total/Rt/Lt), 32.1%/0.0%/44.0% (MST; 22.1/18.8/28.6 months). The ORR and CBR were 24.4% and 75.6%, respectively. The majority of AEs were grades 1 or 2 and were improved with conservative treatment. Grade 3 leukopenia was observed in 2 cases (4.9%), neutropenia in 4 cases (9.8%), and malaise/nausea/diarrhea/perforation in 1 case each (2.4%). Grade 3 leukopenia (2 patients) and neutropenia (3 patients) were more commonly observed in the left-sided group. Diarrhea and perforation were also common in the left-sided group. Conclusions: This second-line modified IRIS regimen with MTAs is safe and effective and results in good PFS and OS.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study of 45 patients aimed to retrospectively examine whether the relationships among the postoperative to preoperative body weight ratio (BWR), meal intake as a good indicator of quality of l ife (QOL), and absorptive kinetics from the small intestine could be expressed by the acetaminophen (AAP) concentration. METHODS: The postoperative/preoperative BWR and meal intake ratio (MIR) were evaluated in 30 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer (ODG group) and 15 patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (LPG group). In addition, all patients underwent functional evaluation using the AAP method. Correlation coefficients of the BWR and MIR with the plasma AAP concentration after meal intake were evaluated. RESULTS: There was a negative correlation between the AAP concentration at 15 min and the BWR in all patients (r = -0.438, P = 0.00259, n = 45) and a weak negative correlation between the AAP concentration at 15 min and the MIR (r = -0.309, P = 0.0368, n = 45). CONCLUSIONS: There were some relationships between slow intestinal absorption in the early postprandial phase and the maintenance of postoperative body weight and meal intake. Namely, operative methods that maintained preoperative slow intestinal absorption were thought to be better for maintaining postoperative QOL.
