Radiosurgical thalamotomy for the management of tremors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medical treatment for tremors may include beta-blockers, primidone, dopaminergic, and anticholinergic drugs but it frequently leads to pharmacoresistance. Therefore, surgical treatment gained relevance as an alternative for those patients.We aim to evaluate radiosurgical thalamotomy as an effective and safe alternative to manage tremors. Pubmed (MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for potential articles that evaluated radiosurgical thalamotomy for the management of tremor. Our analysis included 12 studies with 545 patients, 226 of whom were female. Of these, 64.6% of patients were diagnosed with essential tremor (ET), 34.6% with Parkinson's disease (PD), and 0.8% with both ET and PD. The FTM-TRS global score (MD -5.46; 95% CI [-10.44]-[-0.47]; I2 = 52%) and the drawing (MD -1.40; 95% CI [-2.03]-[-0.76]; I2 = 93%), drinking (MD -1.60; 95% CI [-1.82]-[-1.37]; I2 = 40%), and writing (MD -1.51; 95% CI [-1.89]-[-1.13]; I2 = 89%) grades showed significantly lower mean differences, favoring radiosurgical thalamotomy. A pooled proportion of 12% presented with tremor unchanged, while 38% presented with total elimination of tremor. Adverse events included: major paresis, minor paresis, dysarthria, and numbness. Thus, radiosurgical thalamotomy is a safe alternative for tremors resistant to medication, particularly in high-risk patients for RF or DBS procedures. The recommended dose of 130 to 150 Gy is effective and well-tolerated. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to understand the unpredictability of tissue response to radiation.

Efficacy and safety of adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysms clipping: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebral aneurysms in complex anatomical locations and intraoperative rupture can be challenging. Many methods to reduce blood flow can facilitate its exclusion from the circulation. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of using adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing, and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysm clipping. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies documenting the use of adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing, and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysm clipping and were included in this single-arm meta-analysis. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included neurological outcomes by mRs and GOS, and cardiac outcomes. We evaluated the risk of bias using ROBIN-I, a tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. OpenMetaAnalyst version 2.0 was used for statistical analysis and I2 measured data heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was defined as an I2 > 50%. RESULTS: Our systematic search yielded 10,100 results. After the removal of duplicates and exclusion by title and abstract, 64 studies were considered for full review, of which 29 were included. The overall risk of bias was moderate. The pooled proportions of the adenosine analysis for the different outcomes were: For the primary outcome: 11,9%; for perioperative arrhythmia: 0,19%; for postoperative arrhythmia: 0,56%; for myocardial infarction incidence: 0,01%; for follow-up good recovery (mRs 0-2): 88%; and for neurological deficit:14.1%. In the rapid ventricular pacing analysis, incidences were as follows: peri operative arrhythmia: 0,64%; postoperative arrhythmia: 0,3%; myocardial infarction: 0%. In the hypothermia analysis, the pooled proportion of 30-day mortality was 11,6%. The incidence of post-op neurological deficits was 35,4% and good recovery under neurological analysis by GOS was present in 69.2%. CONCLUSION: The use of the three methods is safe and the related complications were very low. Further studies are necessary, especially with comparative analysis, for extended knowledge.

Is time really brain in stroke therapy?: A meta-analysis of mechanical thrombectomy up to 155 h post ictus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been established as the gold standard of treatment for patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) who present up to 6 h after the onset of the stroke. Recently, the DEFUSE-3 and DAWN trials established the safety of starting the MT procedure up to 16 and 24 h after the patient was last seen well, respectively. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and functional effects of thrombectomy in individuals with AIS detected at a late stage (> 24 h). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were thoroughly searched for research on MT in patients in the extremely late time window after AIS. The primary outcomes were symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, 90-day mortality, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b-3, and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. RESULTS: Our study included fifteen studies involving a total of 1,221 patients who presented with AIS and an extended time window. The primary outcome of interest was the favorable functional outcome, mRS 0-2 at 90 days. The pooled proportion for this outcome was 45% (95% confidence interval 34-58%). Other outcomes included the TICI 2b or 3 (successful recanalization), which was reported in 12 studies and had a 79% incidence in the study population (95% CI 68-87%). Complications included: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), which revealed an incidence of 7% in the study population (95% CI 5-10%); and 90-day mortality, which reported a 27% incidence (95% CI 24-31%). In addition, we conducted a comparative analysis between endovascular treatment and standard medical therapy. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis provides evidence that supports the need of further randomized and prospective clinical trials to better assess the effectiveness and safety of MT in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of cavernous sinus medial wall resection in pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and a single-arm meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pituitary adenomas, benign tumors, can lower quality of life. Pituitary adenomas that invade the medial wall and cavernous sinus (CS) indicate tumor recurrence and partial surgical excision. Despite the cavernous sinus's complexity and risks, new research has improved the surgical procedure and made excision safer. This comprehensive review and single-arm meta-analysis evaluates endocrinological remission and resection rates in pituitary adenomas to determine the benefits and risks of MWCS resection. METHODS: Databases were systematically searched for studies documenting the resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus. The primary outcome was endocrinological remission in patients who underwent resection of the MWCS. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of endocrinological remission (ER) was 63.3%. The excision of MWCS pooled a gross total resection (GTR) proportion of 72.9%. Finally, ICA injury attained a pooled ratio of 0.5%, indicating minimal morbidity in the procedure. CONCLUSION: The cavernous sinus was ruled out, proving the MWCS excision is safe. Limiting population selection to Knosp 3A or lower enhanced GTR frequencies and lowered recurrence, according to subgroup analyses. This meta-analysis shows that MWCS resection can be a beneficial treatment option for pituitary tumors, when there is no macroscopic medial wall invasion and careful patient selection is done, especially for GH- and ACTH-producing tumors that can cause life-threatening metabolic changes.

Robot-assisted vs. manually guided stereoelectroencephalography for refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robotic assistance has improved electrode implantation precision in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) for refractory epilepsy patients. We sought to assess the relative safety of the robotic-assisted (RA) procedure compared to the traditional hand-guided one. A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane was performed for studies directly comparing robot-assisted vs. manually guided SEEG to treat refractory epilepsy. The primary outcomes included target point error (TPE), entry point error (EPE), time of implantation of each electrode, operative time, postoperative intracranial hemorrhage, infection, and neurologic deficit. We included 427 patients from 11 studies, of whom 232 (54.3%) underwent robot-assisted surgery and 196 (45.7%) underwent manually guided surgery. The primary endpoint, TPE, was not statistically significant (MD 0.04 mm; 95% CI - 0.21, - 0.29; p = 0.76). Nonetheless, EPE was significantly lower in the intervention group (MD - 0.57 mm; 95% CI - 1.08; - 0.06; p = 0.03). Total operative time was significantly lower in the RA group (MD - 23.66 min; 95% CI - 32.01, - 15.31; p < 0.00001), as well as the individual time of implantation of each electrode (MD - 3.35 min; 95% CI - 3.68, - 3.03; p < 0.00001). Postoperative intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between groups: robotic (9/145; 6.2%) vs. manual (8/139; 5.7%) (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.40-2.34; p = 0.94). There was no statistically relevant difference in infection (p = 0.4) and postoperative neurological deficit (p = 0.47) incidence between the two groups. In this analysis, there is a potential relevance in the RA procedure when comparing the traditional one, since operative time, time of implantation of each electrode, and EPE were significantly lower in the robotic group. More research is needed to corroborate the superiority of this novel technique.

Direct oral anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients without prior or concurrent indication for anticoagulation: A meta-analysis of randomized studies.

INTRODUCTION: The antithrombotic management following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients who do not have a concurrent indication for long-term anticoagulation therapy is an ongoing source of debate. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus antiplatelet therapy after TAVR in patients without a concomitant indication for chronic oral anticoagulation. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Risk ratios (RR) with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three studies were included, with 2922 patients who underwent TAVR, of whom 1463 (50.1%) received DOACs. Patients who received DOACs therapy had significantly higher all-cause mortality (RR: 1.68; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.22-2.30; p = 0.001) and non-cardiovascular mortality (RR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.13-4.80; p = 0.02). The incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the groups (5.3% vs. 3.8%; RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.90-2.32; p = 0.13). There was no difference between DOACs and antiplatelet therapy in terms of: ischemic stroke (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.76-2.15; p = 0.35) and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.92-2.03; p = 0.13). Lastly, the DOACs group had a significantly lower risk of valve thrombosis than the antiplatelet group (0.8% vs. 3.2%; RR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14-0.51; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing DOACs to antiplatelet therapy after TAVR in patients without a concomitant indication for anticoagulation, DOACs were associated with a lower incidence of valve thrombosis and a higher rate of all-cause mortality, driven by an increase in noncardiac causes of death.