Effect of Biologics on the Risk of Advanced-Stage Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Intestinal Cancer: A Nationwide Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of biologics on the risk of advanced-stage inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated intestinal cancer from a nationwide multicenter data set. METHODS: The medical records of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) diagnosed with IBD-associated intestinal neoplasia (dysplasia or cancer) from 1983 to 2020 were included in this study. Therapeutic agents were classified into 3 types: biologics, 5-aminosalicylic acid, and immunomodulators. The pathological cancer stage was compared based on the drug used in both patients with CD and UC. RESULTS: In total, 1,042 patients (214 CD and 828 UC patients) were included. None of the drugs were significantly associated with cancer stage in the patients with CD. In the patients with UC, an advanced cancer stage was significantly associated with less use of biologics (early stage: 7.7% vs advanced stage: 2.0%, P < 0.001), 5-aminosalicylic acid, and immunomodulators. Biologic use was associated with a lower incidence of advanced-stage cancer in patients diagnosed by regular surveillance (biologics [-] 24.5% vs [+] 9.1%, P = 0.043), but this was not the case for the other drugs. Multivariate analysis showed that biologic use was significantly associated with a lower risk of advanced-stage disease (odds ratio = 0.111 [95% confidence interval, 0.034-0.356], P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Biologic use was associated with a lower risk of advanced IBD-associated cancer in patients with UC but not with CD. The mechanism of cancer progression between UC and CD may be different and needs to be further investigated.

Randomised phase II trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with continuous versus intermittent use of oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III colon cancer (CCOG-1302 study).

BACKGROUND: Peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) caused by oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects patients' quality of life. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) with intermittent oxaliplatin use compared with the standard CAPOX in adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with curative resection for stage II/III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either CAPOX with continuous oxaliplatin (eight cycles of CAPOX) or CAPOX with intermittent oxaliplatin (two cycles of CAPOX, four cycles of capecitabine and two cycles of CAPOX). The primary end-point was the 1-year PSN rate, and the key secondary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled in the intent-to-treat population. After 4 patients withdrew, 196 patients were included in the safety analysis. The overall treatment completion rate was 65% for continuous vs. 89% for intermittent treatment (p < 0.001). The 1-year PSN rate was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-70%) for continuous and 16% (95% CI, 10%-25%) for intermittent treatment (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 52 months, 40 events (20%) were observed. The 3-year DFS was 81% (95% CI, 71%-87%) for continuous and 84% (95% CI, 75%-90%) for intermittent treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.47-1.63). Among patients with high-risk disease (T4 or N2-3), the 3-year DFS was 57% for continuous vs. 74% for intermittent treatment (HR, 0.66). CONCLUSION: CAPOX with planned intermittent oxaliplatin may be feasible as an adjuvant therapy for colon cancer and substantially reduce the duration of long-lasting PSN. TRIAL IDENTIFIER: UMIN000012535.