Inframammary Fold Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inframammary fold reconstruction has scarcely been evaluated in literature. No biomechanical analyses have been performed comparing different reconstructive methods. This evaluation compares the gold-standard suture reconstruction with an intrarib anchor system (Micro BioComposite SutureTak, Arthrex). METHODS: Three analysis groups were compared including 8 Sawbone blocks, 22 embalmed cadaver, and 27 regular cadaver specimens (N = 57). Transient mechanical analysis was performed at 5 N/s using an Instron 5565 test frame. RESULTS: Ultimate load favored the anchor system (compared with the gold-standard suture) by a factor of 9.8 (P < 0.0001) for the regular cadaver group and a factor of 1.7 (P < 0.038) for the embalmed cadaver group. A similar statistically significant benefit was shown for stiffness and load at 2-mm displacement. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed an anchor system to be the biomechanically superior fixation method in terms of ultimate load, fixation stiffness, and displacement at failure when compared with the gold-standard suture method in inframammary fold reconstruction. Because of superior stability in every aspect, an anchor system may be considered for inframammary fold reconstruction.

Long-term follow-up of idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura treated with rituximab.

Rituximab may be used to treat patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) refractory to plasma exchange or recurrent disease. While initial response rates are reported to be high, long-term follow-up data of patients treated with rituximab are not available to date, however important to estimate the safety and benefit of this treatment. Twelve patients with non-familial idiopathic TTP refractory to plasma exchange or with recurrent disease treated with rituximab between 2000 and 2008 were reexamined. The median follow-up was 49.6 months, ranging from 11 to 97 months. All patients achieved initial complete remission after application of rituximab. During follow-up, nine patients remained disease-free and three patients suffered from recurrent disease. All patients with recurrent disease responded to subsequent rituximab therapy. No long-term side effects were noted during the follow-up period. In conclusion, rituximab represents an effective second-line treatment option in relapsing or refractory TTP. Still, patients need to be closely monitored for relapses with extended follow-up.