Antiphospholipid syndrome damage index (DIAPS): distinct long-term kinetic in primary antiphospholipid syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome related to systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombophilia that affects young productive individuals, with permanent damage and negative impact on quality of life. Recently, a damage index specific for APS (DIAPS) was developed. There are, however, no data regarding the comparison of its performance and long-term damage in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and APS related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; APS + SLE). The primary purpose of this study was therefore to compare the long-term damage in patients with these conditions. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a single tertiary center cohort followed for approximately 10 years using a standardized prospective electronic chart database. Fifty consecutive PAPS patients age matched with 50 APS+SLE patients were consecutively selected for the study, and DIAPS was calculated once a year during follow-up. Long-term damage and damage kinetics in both groups were compared. RESULTS: PAPS and APS + SLE had comparable age (47.10 ± 12.4 vs. 44.04 ± 10.80 years; p = 0.19) and time of follow-up (9.40 ± 3.60 vs. 10.94 ± 4.50 years; p = 0.06). At diagnosis, PAPS had higher DIAPS than APS + SLE (1.72 ± 1.17 vs. 0.82 ± 0.96; p < 0.001). At the end of the 10-year follow-up, both groups presented comparable mean damage scores (2.04 ± 1.50 vs. 2.24 ± 1.61; p = 0.52). The damage increment throughout the observation period for PAPS was solely 35%, whereas for APS + SLE it was gradual, persistent and reached 139% at the end of follow-up, with a total damage increment for PAPS lower than APS + SLE (0.43 ± 0.30 vs. 1.22 ± 1.24; p < 0.001). Of note, the frequency of individuals who acquired damage was lower in PAPS than in APS + SLE (32% vs. 71%; p < 0.001). PAPS also had a longer delay in diagnosis than APS + SLE (4.00 ± 4.20 vs. 2.54 ± 3.05 years; p = 0.04). This delay was positively correlated with a higher damage score at diagnosis (r = 0.36, p < 0.001) in all groups. CONCLUSION: We identified a distinct pattern of damage in PAPS and APS related to SLE. Damage in PAPS is an early event, while APS+SLE is associated with higher long-term damage, with a striking increment of damage along the follow-up. A diagnosis delay is correlated with higher damage scores. Damage surveillance therefore requires different approaches for these two conditions.

Late-onset biopsy-proven lupus nephritis without other associated autoimmune diseases: severity and long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Lupus nephritis (LN) usually develops within the first years of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) onset and rarely after that. There are scarce studies comparing early- versus late-onset nephritis (before versus after five years of SLE diagnosis). The aim of this study was to compare the severity and long-term outcome (after 7 years) in these two, late-onset and early-onset, nephritis groups. METHODS: This study included 93 patients from rheumatology tertiary centers from Brazil and Italy, all of them with biopsy-proven LN with > 7 years follow-up. Patients were divided in two groups: early-onset nephritis ( n = 75) and late-onset nephritis ( n = 18). Clinical and laboratorial data were obtained using a standardized electronic chart database protocol carried out at 1-6 months interval and established in 2000. Patients >50 years or with concomitant autoimmune diseases were excluded. Variables evaluated at the LN presentation were Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), creatinine, albumin, anti-DNA positivity and nephritis class. Variables evaluated at the long-term outcome (after 7 years) were Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SDI), creatinine, dialysis and mortality. RESULTS: The average time of LN presentation was 10.94 ± 3.73 years for the late-onset and 1.20 ± 1.60 years for the early-onset group. Their similar nephritis duration (12.44 ± 3.2 versus 13.28 ± 4.03 years, p = 0.41) and comparable mean ages (49.17 ± 9.9 versus 44.11 ± 10.8 years old, p = 0.06) allow a more accurate comparison. Regarding severity, late-onset was similar to early-onset group: SLEDAI (8 (range: 6-22) versus 12 (range: 2-24), p = 0.47), creatinine (1.36 ± 0.94 versus 1.36 ± 1.13 mg/dl, p = 0.99); albumin (2.84 ± 0.65 versus 2.59 ± 0.84 mg/dl, p = 0.30); proteinuria (3.77 ± 2.18 versus 5.01 ± 4.51 g/vol, p = 0.26); proliferative nephritis (44% ( n = 8) versus 60% ( n = 45), p = 0.23). There was also no difference in the long-term outcomes between groups: SDI (1 (range: 0-5) versus 0.5 (range: 0-5), p = 0.27); creatinine (2.04 ± 2.38 versus 1.69 ± 2.26 mg/dl, p = 0.56); dialysis (22% ( n = 4) versus 13% ( n = 10), p = 0.46) and mortality (0% ( n = 0) versus 12% ( n = 9), p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: This study provides novel evidence of comparable long-term outcomes between late-onset and early-onset nephritis, which is most likely explained by the observation that at presentation, the clinical, laboratorial and histological features of late-onset and early-onset nephritis are similar. This suggests that there should be no distinct treatment targets and therapeutic interventions for the late- and early-onset groups.

Effectiveness of renoprotective approaches for persistent proteinuria in lupus nephritis: more than just immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a tightly controlled renoprotective protocol in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with persistent proteinuria. METHODS: Thirteen SLE patients with nephritis and persistent proteinuria (>1 g/24 hours) were included. The protocol consisted of regular clinical evaluations every two weeks to assess blood pressure (BP, target <130/80 mmHg), adherence to therapy, diet and smoking. No change in immunosuppressive drugs was allowed but reduction of glucocorticoid dose was permitted if indicated. Clinical, laboratory and treatment evaluations were performed at baseline and at the end of the study (after three months). RESULTS: SLE patients had a mean age of 37.85 ± 7.68 years and disease duration of 9.85 ± 7.29 years. At baseline, patients had a mean duration of maintenance therapy of 10.38 ± 7.56 months, 12 with mycophenolate mofetil (92.3%) and one with azathioprine (7.7%). At least one dose optimization of antihypertensive regimen was required in all patients during the study. Seven patients (53.8%) had BP>130/80mmHg at baseline. At the end, 11 patients (84.6%) achieved stable BP target; 92.3% were using an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, 53.9% an angiotensin receptor blocker, and 46.2% were using combined therapy. All patients had a significant reduction in proteinuria levels (2.26 ± 1.09 vs 0.88 ± 0.54 g/24 hours, p < 0.001) and 61.5% achieved proteinuria <1 g/24 hours. A significant decrease in mean prednisone dose was observed (10.96 ± 6.73 vs 5.38 ± 3.36 mg/day, p = 0.013) as well as mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score (4.38 ± 0.72 vs 3.08 ± 1.86, p = 0.043). No significant changes were identified in serum creatinine, albumin, potassium, complement 3 and complement 4 levels ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that a tightly controlled renoprotective protocol is effective in reducing persistent proteinuria in lupus nephritis. The concomitant reduction of prednisone without any change in immunosuppression reinforces the importance of strategies beyond the treatment of nephritis activity.