Clinical Efficacies of FLT3 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

FLT3 mutations are the most common genomic alteration detected in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a worse clinical prognosis. The highly frequent FLT3 mutations, together with the side effects associated with clinical prognosis, make FLT3 promising treatment targets and have provoked the advancement of FLT3 inhibitors. Recently, numerous FLT3 inhibitors were actively developed, and thus the outcomes of this aggressive subtype of AML were significantly improved. Recently, midostaurin and gilteritinib were approved as frontline treatment of AML and as therapeutic agents in the recurred disease by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Recently, numerous promising clinical trials attempted to seek appropriate management in frontline settings, in relapsed/refractory disease, or after stem cell transplantation in AML. This review follows numerous clinical trials about the usefulness of FLT3 inhibitors as frontline therapy, as relapsed/refractory conditioning, and as maintenance therapy of stem cell transplantation. The cumulative data of FLT3 inhibitors would be important clinical evidence for further management with FLT3 inhibitors in AML patients with FLT3 mutations.

Targeted Therapeutic Approach Based on Understanding of Aberrant Molecular Pathways Leading to Leukemic Proliferation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous hematopoietic neoplasm with various genetic abnormalities in myeloid stem cells leading to differentiation arrest and accumulation of leukemic cells in bone marrow (BM). The multiple genetic alterations identified in leukemic cells at diagnosis are the mainstay of World Health Organization classification for AML and have important prognostic implications. Recently, understanding of heterogeneous and complicated molecular abnormalities of the disease could lead to the development of novel targeted therapeutic agents. In the past years, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, BCL-2 inhibitors (venetovlax), IDH 1/2 inhibitors (ivosidenib and enasidenib) FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib, and enasidenib), and hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitors (gladegib) have received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of AML. Especially, AML patients with elderly age and/or significant comorbidities are not currently suitable for intensive chemotherapy. Thus, novel therapeutic planning including the abovementioned target therapies could lead to improve clinical outcomes in the patients. In the review, we will present various important and frequent molecular abnormalities of AML and introduce the targeted agents of AML that received FDA approval based on the previous studies.

Resistance Mechanisms to CAR T-Cell Therapy and Overcoming Strategy in B-Cell Hematologic Malignancies.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promising clinical impact against hematologic malignancies. CD19 is a marker on the surface of normal B cells as well as most B-cell malignancies, and thus has a role as an effective target for CAR T-cell therapy. In numerous clinical data, successes with cell therapy have provided anticancer therapy as a potential therapeutic option for patients who are resistant to standard chemotherapies. However, recent growing evidence showed the limitations of the treatment such as antigen-positive relapse due to poor CAR T-cell persistence and antigen-negative relapses associated with CAR-driven mutations, alternative splicing, epitope masking, low antigen density, and lineage switching. The understanding of the resistance mechanisms to the cell therapy has developed novel potential treatment strategies, including dual-targeting therapy (dual and tandem CAR), and armored and universal CAR T-cell therapies. In this review, we provide an overview of resistance mechanisms to CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell malignancies and also review therapeutic strategies to overcome these resistances.

Understanding Splenomegaly in Myelofibrosis: Association with Molecular Pathogenesis.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clinical manifestation of chronic BCR-ABL1-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Splenomegaly is one of the major clinical manifestations of MF and is directly linked to splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH). EMH is associated with abnormal trafficking patterns of clonal hematopoietic cells due to the dysregulated bone marrow (BM) microenvironment leading to progressive splenomegaly. Several recent data have emphasized the role of several cytokines for splenic EMH. Alteration of CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway could also lead to splenic EMH by migrated clonal hematopoietic cells from BM to the spleen. Moreover, low Gata1 expression was found to be significantly associated with the EMH. Several gene mutations were found to be associated with significant splenomegaly in MF. In recent data, JAK2V617F homozygous mutation was associated with a larger spleen size. In other data, CALR mutations in MF were signigicantly associated with longer larger splenomegaly-free survivals than others. In addition, MF patients with ≥1 mutations in AZXL1, EZH1 or IDH1/2 had significantly low spleen reduction response in ruxolitinib treatment. Developments of JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, pacritinib, momelotinib, and febratinib enabled the effective management in MF patients. Especially, significant spleen reduction responses of the drugs were demonstrated in several randomized clinical studies, although those could not eradicate allele burdens of MF.

Randomized phase II study of gefitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed previous chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Gefitinib and erlotinib are potent EGFR TKIs, with antitumor activity. In this randomized, single-center, non-comparative phase II trial, the efficacy and safety of gefitinib and erlotinib was evaluated as the second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, metastatic stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy and had either EGFR mutation or at least two out of three clinical factors associated with higher incidence of EGFR mutations (female, adenocarcinoma histology, and never-smoker) were eligible. RESULTS: A total of 96 (48 per arm) patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib- or erlotinib-arm, respectively. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms. The response rates (RR) were 47.9% in the gefitinib arm and 39.6% in the erlotinib arm. Median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI, 1.3-8.5) in the gefitinib arm and 3.1 months (95% CI, 0.0-6.4) in the erlotinib arm. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was skin rash. Exploratory analyses showed that there was no significant difference in RR and PFS in the gefitinib arm compared to the erlotinib arm (RR (%) 47.9 vs. 39.6, p=0.269; median survival (months) 4.9 vs. 3.1, p=0.336). There was no significant difference in QOL between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Both gefitinib and erlotinib showed effective activity and tolerable toxicity profiles as second-line treatment for the selected population of NSCLC. We may consider conducting a phase III trial to directly compare the efficacy and toxicity between gefitinib and erlotinib in an enriched patient population.

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: a retrospective comparison with previously known prognostic models.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is now the treatment of choice for systemic therapy of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we present the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced HCC who were treated with sorafenib. METHODS: Data of 201 sorafenib-treated, metastatic HCC patients were collected from a single institution tumor registry. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS). RESULTS: Chronic hepatitis B was the predominant cause of HCC (84%). Of 162 evaluable patients, 4 partial responses were recorded. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months, the median FFS and OS were 2.5 months (95% CI 2.3-2.7) and 5.3 months (95% CI 4.4-6.3), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic factors associated with FFS were the presence of ascites, portal venous thrombosis, serum α-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/ml, albumin, bilirubin, tumor size and number, and performance status. Likewise, the presence of ascites, portal venous thrombosis, tumor size and number, performance status and baseline levels of α-fetoprotein, albumin and bilirubin were significantly related with OS. After adjusting for performance status, the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scoring system and Okuda stages can better predict the hazard of failure or death than the Child-Pugh classification. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scores or Okuda stages, along with performance status, can be useful in stratifying patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib.

Analysis of prognostic factors of pediatric-type sarcomas in adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric-type sarcomas such as Ewing's sarcoma (EWS)/primitive neuroectodermal tumor family and rhabdomyosarcoma are relatively uncommon in adult patients. Optimal treatment strategies for this population and prognosis in adult patients compared with pediatric patients remain controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed pediatric-type sarcoma patients older than 15 years at a single institution. RESULTS: A total of 84 consecutive patients between 1995 and 2009 were identified at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Median age was 30 years with a range of 15-74 years. Forty-seven patients (56.0%) were diagnosed with Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor family, 34 (40.5%) with rhabdomyosarcoma and 3 (3.6%) with desmoplastic round-cell tumor. Median follow-up duration was 5.9 years. Median overall survival for all patients was 33.1 months (95% CI 13.5-52.7) and median event-free survival for all patients was 14.4 months (95% CI 5.9-22.9 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that localized disease was a significant independent prognostic factor for longer overall survival (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.66, p = 0.003), and favorable primary tumor sites were associated with longer event-free survival (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.98, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: We identified the prognostic variables which may facilitate risk-adapted therapies for this rare adult sarcoma group, which should be further investigated.

Primary CNS lymphoma other than DLBCL: a descriptive analysis of clinical features and treatment outcomes.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) constitutes most primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL), whereas T-cell, low-grade and Burkitt's lymphomas (BL) are rarely encountered. Due to the paucity of cases, little is known about the clinical features and treatment outcomes of PCNSL other than DLBCL. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients with PCNSL other than DLBCL. Fifteen patients, newly diagnosed with PCNSLs other than DLBCL between 2000 and 2010, were included. The male to female ratio was 0.67:1 with a median age of diagnosis of 31 years (range 18-59). Pathologic distributions were as follows: peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL; n=7), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZBCL; n=1), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL; n=2), Burkitt's lymphoma (n=1), other unspecified (T-cell lineage, n=2; B-cell lineage, n=2). Thirteen patients (87%) showed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS) 1-2. The remaining two were one PTCL patient and one Burkitt's lymphoma patient. Of the nine patients with T-cell lymphoma, five (56%) had multifocal lesions, and one (20%) with LPL of the five patients with B-cell lymphoma showed a single lesion. Leptomeningeal lymphomatosis was identified in two patients (one with Burkitt's lymphoma and one with unspecified B-cell lymphoma). Two patients (22%) with T-cell lymphoma died 7.7 and 23.3 months later, respectively, due to disease progression, despite HD-MTX-based therapy. Six patients with T-cell lymphoma (6/9, 66.7%) and four patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma (4/5, 80%) achieved complete response and have survived without relapse (Table 3). One patient with Burkitt's lymphoma showed poor clinical features with ECOG PS 3, deep structure, multifocal, and leptomeningeal lymphomatosis, and died 7.6 months after the initiation of treatment. In comparison with previously reported DLBCLs (median OS 6.4 years, 95% CI 3.7-9.1 years), T-cell lymphoma showed equivocal or favorable clinical outcomes and low-grade B-cell lymphomas, such as MZBCL and LPL, had a good prognosis. However, primary CNS Burkitt's lymphoma presented poor clinical outcomes and showed a comparatively aggressive clinical course. In conclusion, primary CNS lymphoma other than DLBCL occurred more in younger patients and showed a generally good prognosis, except for Burkitt's lymphoma. Further research on treatment strategies for Burkitt's lymphoma is needed.

Favorable response to doxorubicin combination chemotherapy does not yield good clinical outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer with triple-negative phenotype.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the responses to first line treatment and clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palliative doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) according to molecular cancer subtype. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for 110 metastatic breast cancer patients selected on the basis of palliative AC treatment and the availability of immunohistochemical data for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2/neu) status. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients analyzed, 71 (64.5%) were hormone receptor positive (HR+), 14 (12.7%) were HER2+, and 25 (22.7%) were triple negative (TN). There were no differences in age, stage at diagnosis, total number of cycles of palliative chemotherapy, incidence of visceral metastasis, and metastatic sites with the exception of liver among breast cancer subtypes. The overall response rates to AC were 55.9% for the HR+ subgroup, 42.9% for the HER2+ subgroup, and 56.5% for the TN subgroup. The progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2+ and TN were significantly shorter than in the HR+ (median PFS, 9.1 vs 8.1 vs 11.5 months, respectively; p = 0.0002). The overall survival (OS) was 25.4 months in the TN subgroup and 27.3 months in HER2+ subgroup. The median OS for these two groups was significantly shorter than for patients in the HR+ subgroup (median, 38.5 months; 95% CI, 30.1-46.9 months; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The response to palliative AC chemotherapy did not differ among breast cancer subtypes. Despite chemosensitivity for palliative AC, the TN subtype has a shorter overall survival than non-TN subtypes. Innovative treatment strategies should be developed to slow the course of disease.

Erlotinib monotherapy for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter trial by the Korean Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI Pharmaceuticals, Melville, NY) is an oral, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has antitumor activity and good tolerability in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In particular, higher response rates have been reported in Asian patients than in Western patients. The aim of this study conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of erlotinib monotherapy as a palliative treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Korea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC including recurrent or metastatic disease, with performance status from 0 to 3, were eligible either if they had received any anticancer treatment except epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors or if they were unsuitable for chemotherapy because of poor performance status. Enrolled patients were treated with oral erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg daily until disease progression or development of intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled between January 2005 and May 2006. Forty-four patients (36.7%) were female and 72 patients were current or former smoker. Fifty percent of patients had received one prior palliative chemotherapy regimens and 34.2% had two or more prior palliative regimens. The overall tumor response rate was 24.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.8-32.8%) with 4 complete responses and 25 partial responses, and the disease control rate was 56.7%. The favorable clinical variables for tumor response were female (P = 0.001), never smokers (P = 0.041), and adenocarcinoma (P = 0.001). The most common adverse event was skin rash (78% of which grade 3 or 4 skin rash occurred in 13.3% of the patients). With a median follow-up of 23.6 months, the median time to progression was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.2-3.2), and the median overall survival was 12.9 months (95% CI, 6.9-18.8). By multivariate analysis, female and development of skin rash were significantly associated with longer time to progression and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib monotherapy showed significant antitumor activity and an acceptable tolerability profile as a palliative treatment in advanced NSCLC patients in Korea, especially in females, never smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma histology.

A phase I trial of S-1 with oxaliplatin in patients with relapsed and metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: S-1 showed clinical activity in colorectal cancer, and the preclinical data of S-1 with oxaliplatin showed synergistic activity in an animal model. This phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of S-1 with oxaliplatin and to define its recommended dose for the subsequent phase II study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated colorectal adenocarcinoma were eligible in this study if they had measurable lesions. S-1 was administered on days 1-14, with doses starting from 60 mg/m2 per day and escalating by 10 mg/m2 at each dose level. Oxaliplatin was given at the fixed dose of 130 mg/m2, through 2-h i.v. infusion on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients received six different S-1 dose levels. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were neutropenia, diarrhea, and vomiting. At dose level 5 (100 mg/m2), two patients experienced DLTs, while none of the third cohorts did. At dose level 6 (110 mg/m2), two patients experienced DLTs, and one of them died from treatment-related toxicity. The accrual was then stopped. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose is S-1 100 mg/m2 on days 1-14, with 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1, every 3 weeks. This regimen is proposed for the phase II study.

A retrospective study to compare two methotrexate-based regimens for primary central nervous system lymphoma.

A retrospective analysis to compare the treatment outcomes of two regimens with different doses of methotrexate (MTX). Seventy-two patients, newly diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma between 1995 and 2006, were included. All patients were treated with one of the two different MTX regimens depending on when the diagnosis was made. Thirty-six patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2002 were treated with 1 g/m(2) of intravenous MTX (HD-MTX 1 g/m(2), cohort 1). The other 36 patients, diagnosed between 2003 and 2006, received 3.5 g/m(2) of intravenous MTX (HD-MTX 3.5 g/m(2), cohort 2). The median age was 47 years (range, 17-78 years) and 42 patients (58.3%) were male. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of all patients was 90.3 and 52.9 months, respectively. Although OS and PFS was not statistically different between the two cohorts, cohort 2 achieved higher complete response/unconfirmed complete response rates than cohort 1 at an evaluation conducted between completion of intravenous MTX therapy and the initiation of radiotherapy (52.8% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p = 0.005). Furthermore, there were no deaths within 6 months of MTX therapy for the cohort 2, whereas there were eight deaths by 6-months for cohort 1 (p = 0.003). Even though cohort 2 failed to show superior survival outcomes compared with cohort 1 after sequential brain radiotherapy and intravenous cytarabine, the higher early CR/CRu rate of cohort 2 compared with cohort 1 might indicate that a high dose of MTX is desirable.

A retrospective analysis of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Because treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients after failure with first-line chemotherapy remains controversial, we performed this retrospective analysis based on the data obtained from 1455 patients registered in a first-line treatment cohort with respect to receiving or not receiving subsequent chemotherapy. METHODS: The decision for administering second-line chemotherapy was, in most cases, at the discretion of the physician. Seven-hundred twenty-five (50%) received second-line chemotherapy after first-line failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the recognized baseline parameters for survival. RESULTS: At the time of initiating second-line chemotherapy, the patients' median age was 56 years (range, 22 to 86) and 139 (19%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or more. Seven (1%) complete and 108 (15%) partial responses to second-line chemotherapy were observed for an overall response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 19%). The median progression-free and overall survivals, calculated from the start of second-line chemotherapy, were 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.3) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 7.5), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that low baseline hemoglobin level (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90) and a poor performance status (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83) were independent negative prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Performance status, along with baseline hemoglobin level, could be used to identify the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from second-line chemotherapy for AGC.

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin combination as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective phase II trial of IrOx in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aged > or =18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, at stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV or with recurrent disease not suitable for primary surgical treatment, with no palliative chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the chest or immunotherapy or biologic therapy, the presence of measurable disease by RECIST, and who had given signed written informed consent, were eligible. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 65 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were enrolled in June and August 2007, the median age was 59 years (47-73). In total, 71 cycles were administered with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1-6 cycles) and 18 patients were evaluable for treatment response. An independent review of tumor responses gave an overall response rate of 27.7% (CR: 0, PR: 5/18; 95% CI, 7-48.4%) by intent-to-treat analysis. The median overall survival of all patients was 14 months and the median time-to-progression was 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.959-6.441). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (7% of all cycles) and neutropenia (5.6% of all cycles). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in one patient and one patient died due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that IrOx combination therapy has moderate activity with a tolerable toxicity profile. However, it was not warranted to evaluate further this regimen as first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC using the current dosages and schedule.

The role of palliative chemotherapy for advanced pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma.

Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma is an uncommon malignant tumor of the lung, which has the dual cell components of spindle or giant cells and epithelial cells. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical course and efficacy of palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Twelve patients were diagnosed with advanced pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma and received palliative chemotherapy from February 2000 to December 2007. Among the 12 patients, five patients received gemcitabine/cisplatin, three patients received gemcitabine/carboplatin, two patients received paclitaxel/carboplatin, one patient received paclitaxel/cisplatin, and one patient received docetaxel/cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy. The median patient's age was 62 (range, 32-72 years). Among the 12 patients, nine patients had relapsed disease after curative resection and three patients had metastatic disease at the initial presentation. After treatment with first-line palliative chemotherapy, seven patients (58%) had progressive disease, three patients (25%) had stable disease, and only two patients (17%) had a partial response. The median overall survival from the day of initiation of first-line chemotherapy was only 8 months (95% CI, 6-10) with median follow-up of 26 months. These results showed the dismal prognosis and the poor response to chemotherapy of advanced pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Further studies are needed to investigate whether the current strategy of palliative chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma can be justified or not. Moreover, additional novel treatment approaches are required.

Palliative chemotherapy for non-transitional cell carcinomas of the urothelial tract.

Non-transitional cell carcinomas of the urothelial tract comprise 5-10% of urothelial cancers. Clinical information regarding the clinical behavior and chemotherapy outcome of non-transitional cell carcinomas of the urothelial tract are incomplete due to their rarity. The object of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and the efficacy of palliative chemotherapy in advanced non-transitional cell carcinomas of the urothelial tract. We analyzed the clinical records of 21 consecutive patients who received palliative chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic non-transitional cell carcinomas of the urothelial tract between January 1995 and November 2007. All the 21 patients received first-line chemotherapy with platinum-based regimens which are known to be effective in transitional cell urothelial carcinomas. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range, 27-71 years). The primary sites of involvement were the bladder, urethra, urachus, and ureter in 43%, 29%, 19%, and 10% of the patients, respectively. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type (67%); squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma comprised 24 and 10% of the histologic types, respectively. With a median duration of follow-up of 32 months (range, 12-71 months), the median overall survival for all 21 patients from the day of first-line chemotherapy was 13 months (95% CI, 6.8-19.2). The expected 1-year survival rate was 50.6% (95% CI, 28.6-72.5). Univariate analysis showed a better median overall survival in patients with adenocarcinoma, compared to non-adenocarcinomas (47 vs. 10 months, P = 0.049). The median overall survival of patients who received platinum-based palliative chemotherapy for advanced non-transitional cell carcinomas was comparable to previous studies for patients with transitional cell carcinomas. Adenocarcinomas appear to have a favorable prognosis for the survival of the patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-transitional cell carcinomas.

Irinotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: The phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan as salvage single-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic pancreatic cancer, progressive after previous gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were treated with irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. Treatment was repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Between March 2004 to February 2007, 33 patients were registered and treated with irinotecan monotherapy. The patients' median age was 59 years (range 36-70) and two had an ECOG performance status of 2. A total of 167 chemotherapy cycles were delivered (median, 4; range 2-12). In an intent-to-treat analysis, three (9%) confirmed partial response and 13 patients with stable disease were observed for a disease control rate of 48%. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 2.0 months (95% CI, 0.7-3.3) and 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.4), respectively. Toxic effects were mainly gastrointestinal (nausea in 64% of patients, diarrhea in 36%), Toxicity profiles were generally predictable and manageable, and there was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy with single-agent irinotecan is marginally effective and well tolerated regimen for gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic factor analysis in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer: how can we improve the treatment outcomes?

PURPOSE: We conducted this study to analyze clinicopathologic features and treatment outcomes for various treatment modalities in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed using medical records of patients who were diagnosed with metastatic brain tumors from breast cancer. The treatment modalities applied included whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and systemic treatments such as chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. RESULTS: Among 125 female breast cancer patients with brain metastases, 87.2% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-2. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months (95% CI 3.9-9.2). A multivariate analysis using the Cox-regression test identified three risk factors; poor PS (P = 0.023), HER2 positivity (P = 0.013), and no additional systemic treatment (P = 0.006). Those patients who had no risk factors showed outstanding outcome (median OS 49 months). On the contrary, the patients who had all risk factors (poor PS with HER2 positive and did not receive additional systemic chemotherapy) showed dismal prognosis (median OS 2 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our new classification according to the suggested risk factors for patients with metastatic brain tumor from breast cancer reflects particular characteristics of each subset of the patients with good prognostic capacity.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of patients with "peripheral T cell lymphoma, unspecified".

The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate clinical features and treatment outcomes in patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma-unspecified (PTCL-U). Eighty-four patients who were diagnosed with PTCL-U between February 1995 and December 2005 were included in the study. Around 70% of the patients presented with stage III-IV disease; 24% were categorized as high or high-intermediate risk according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system, and 45% were classified as groups 3 or 4 using the Prognostic Index for PTCL-U (PIT). Extranodal involvement was found in 51 of 85 patients (60%). Most of the initial chemotherapy regimens were anthracycline-based (75%). The overall response rates for patients treated with initial chemotherapy and salvage chemotherapy were 63.1% (52.6% of complete response (CR), 10.5% of partial response (PR)) and 35% (9% of CR, 26%of PR), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival of all patients were 17.1 months (95% CI, 0.0-40.5) and 35.5 months (95% CI, 1.2-69.8), respectively. Poor performance status, the presence of B symptoms, IPI scores >or=3 and PIT class >or=2 were predictive prognostic factors for survival.

A phase II study of oxaliplatin in combination with doxorubicin as first-line systemic chemotherapy in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We designed a phase II trial of the combination with oxaliplatin and doxorubicin for patients with unresectable HCC to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) and the toxicity. METHODS: Forty patients with inoperable, systemic chemotherapy naive HCC were enrolled. Finally, 32 patients received oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) and doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Eighty-two treatment cycles were administered (median 2 cycles, range 1-6). There was no treatment-related mortality. The ORR was 15.6% (95% CI, 3.3-28.7) with five partial responses. The median overall survival and median overall progression free survival were 31 weeks (95% CI, 22-40 weeks) and 12 weeks (95% CI, 5-19 weeks). Nausea and peripheral neuropathy were most frequent non-hematologic toxicities (nausea, n = 15; peripheral neuropathy, n = 10). The most frequent grade 3-4 hematologic adverse event was neutropenia (14 of 82 cycles) including three cases of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oxaliplatin and doxorubicin showed modest activity and a tolerable toxicity profile in advanced HCC patients.