Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 22(4): 229-240, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146949

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies in Pakistan have shown considerable over prescribing of antibiotics in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 despite very low prevalence of bacterial infections. Irrational use of antibiotics will worsen antimicrobial resistance (AMR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients in the COVID-19 wards of three tertiary care hospitals to assess antibiotic use during the sixth COVID-19 wave. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients were included, most were male (66.9%), aged 30-50 years (50.7%) with diabetes mellitus the most common comorbidity. The most common symptoms at presentation were cough (47.9%) and arthralgia-myalgia (41.5%). Around 3% were asymptomatic, 34.9% had mild, 30.3% moderate, and 23.6% had severe disease, with 8.1% critical. Chest X-ray abnormalities were seen in 43.3% of patients and 37% had elevated white cell counts, with 35.2% having elevated C-reactive protein levels. Around 91% COVID-19 patients were prescribed antibiotics during their hospital stay, with only a few with proven bacterial co-infections or secondary bacterial infections. Most antibiotics were from the 'Watch' category (90.8%) followed by the 'Reserve' category (4.8%), similar to previous COVID-19 waves. CONCLUSION: There continued to be excessive antibiotics use among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Pakistan. Urgent measures are needed to address inappropriate prescribing including greater prescribing of Access antibiotics where pertinent.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecções Bacterianas , COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 21(10): 1025-1055, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37740561

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global concern. Currently, the greatest mortality due to AMR is in Africa. A key driver continues to be high levels of dispensing of antibiotics without a prescription. AREAS COVERED: A need to document current rates of dispensing, their rationale and potential ways forward including antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs). A narrative review was undertaken. The highest rates of antibiotic purchasing were in Eritrea (up to 89.2% of antibiotics dispensed), Ethiopia (up to 87.9%), Nigeria (up to 86.5%), Tanzania (up to 92.3%) and Zambia (up to 100% of pharmacies dispensing antibiotics without a prescription). However, considerable variation was seen with no dispensing in a minority of countries and situations. Key drivers of self-purchasing included high co-payment levels for physician consultations and antibiotic costs, travel costs, convenience of pharmacies, patient requests, limited knowledge of antibiotics and AMR and weak enforcement. ASPs have been introduced in some African countries along with quality targets to reduce inappropriate dispensing, centering on educating pharmacists and patients. EXPERT OPINION: ASP activities need accelerating among community pharmacies alongside quality targets, with greater monitoring of pharmacists' activities to reduce inappropriate dispensing. Such activities, alongside educating patients and healthcare professionals, should enhance appropriate dispensing of antibiotics and reduce AMR.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Farmacêuticos , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Etiópia
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(11)2022 Nov 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36366374

RESUMO

Vaccination protects people from serious illness and associated complications. Conspiracy theories and misinformation on vaccines have been rampant during the COVID-19 pandemic and are considered significant drivers of vaccine hesitancy. Since vaccine hesitancy can undermine efforts to immunize the population against COVID-19 and interferes with the vaccination rate, this study aimed to ascertain the COVID-19-vaccine-related conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, views regarding vaccine mandates, and willingness to pay for vaccines among the general population. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted (April−August 2021) among the adult population in six countries (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, India, Malaysia, Sudan, and Egypt). Participants were recruited using an exponential, non-discriminate snowball sampling method. A validated self-completed electronic questionnaire was used for the data collection. All the participants responded to questions on various domains of the study instrument, including conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, and willingness to pay. The responses were scored according to predefined criteria and stratified into various groups. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 22. A total of 2481 responses were included in the study (Pakistan 24.1%, Saudi Arabia 19.5%, India 11.6%, Malaysia 8.1%, Sudan 19.3%, and Egypt 17.3%). There was a preponderance of participants ≤40 years old (18−25 years: 55.8%, 26−40 years: 28.5%) and females (57.1%). The average score of the COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy belief scale (C19V-CBS) was 2.30 ± 2.12 (median 2; range 0−7). Our analysis showed that 30% of the respondents were found to achieve the ideal score of zero, indicating no conspiracy belief. The mean score of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale (C19V-HS) was 25.93 ± 8.11 (range: 10−50). The majority (45.7%) had C19V-HA scores of 21−30 and nearly 28% achieved a score greater than 30, indicating a higher degree of hesitancy. There was a significant positive correlation between conspiracy beliefs and vaccine hesitancy (Spearman's rho = 0.547, p < 0.001). Half of the study population were against the vaccine mandate. Respondents in favor of governmental enforcement of COVID-19 vaccines had significantly (p < 0.001) lower scores on the C19V-CBS and C19V-HS scale. Nearly 52% reported that they would only take vaccine if it were free, and only 24% were willing to pay for COVID-19 vaccines. A high prevalence of conspiracy beliefs and vaccine hesitancy was observed in the targeted countries. Our findings highlight the dire need for aggressive measures to counter the conspiracy beliefs and factors underlying this vaccine hesitancy.

4.
Cureus ; 14(7): e27230, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35910696

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing focus on researching the management of children with COVID-19 admitted to hospital, especially among developing countries with new variants alongside concerns with the overuse of antibiotics. Patient care can be improved with guidelines, but concerns with the continued imprudent prescribing of antimicrobials, including antibiotics, antivirals, and antimalarials. OBJECTIVE: Consequently, a need to document the current management of children with COVID-19 across India. Key outcome measures included the percentage of prescribed antimicrobials, adherence to current guidelines, and mortality. METHODOLOGY: A point prevalence study using specially developed report forms among 30 hospitals in India. RESULTS: The majority of admitted children were aged between 11 and 18 years (70%) and boys (65.8%). Reasons for admission included respiratory distress, breathing difficulties, and prolonged fever. 75.3% were prescribed antibiotics typically empirically (68.3% overall), with most on the Watch list (76.7%). There were no differences in antibiotic prescribing whether hospitals followed guidelines or not. There was also appreciable prescribing of antimalarials (21.4% of children), antivirals (15.2%), and antiparasitic medicines (27.2%) despite limited evidence. The majority of children (92.2%) made a full recovery. CONCLUSION: It was encouraging to see low hospitalization rates. However, concerns about high empiric use of antibiotics and high use of antimalarials, antivirals, and antiparasitic medicines exist. These can be addressed by instigating appropriate stewardship programs.

5.
SN Compr Clin Med ; 3(8): 1691-1695, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34095752

RESUMO

The discovery of different antimicrobial agents has revolutionized the treatment against a variety of infections for many decades, but the emergence of antimicrobial resistance require rigorous measures, even amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This retrospective study aimed to examine the consumption of antibiotics in patients with COVID-19 admitted into the five hospitals in the province of Punjab, Pakistan. We collected data on the consumption of antibiotics, classified using the World Health Organization (WHO) AWaRe (Access, Watch, and Reserve), within two months-August and September, 2020, and the corresponding months in 2019. Consumption of antibiotics was presented as daily define dose (DDD) per 100 occupied bed-days. Eight different classes of antibiotics were prescribed to patients with COVID-19 without culture tests being performed, with the prescribing of antibiotics of the Watch category was especially prevalent. The consumption of antibiotics was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period: the consumption of azithromycin increased from 11.5 DDDs per 100 occupied bed-days in 2019 to 17.0 DDDs per 100 occupied bed-days in 2020, while the consumption of ceftriaxone increased from 20.2 DDDs per 100 occupied bed-days in 2019 to 25.1 DDDs per 100 occupied bed-days in 2020. The current study revealed non-evidence-based utilization of antibiotics among patients with COVID-19 admitted into the hospitals in Pakistan. Evidently, the current COVID-19 pandemic is a public health threat of notable dimensions which has compromised the ongoing antimicrobial stewardship program, potentially leading to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance among pathogens.

6.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 32(2): 497-504, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35017344

RESUMO

Nurses are increasingly being regarded as the nucleus of the health care system, as well as serving as an advocate for health-care consumers. Therefore, adequate acute kidney injury (AKI) knowledge of nurses would definitely have a positive impact on an early diagnosis, management, and outcome of AKI. This cross-sectional study was aimed to assess the knowledge of AKI among nurses working at public and private hospitals at Lahore and Sialkot, Pakistan. The study was conducted from October 2017 to March 2018. A convenient sampling method was used and data were gathered using a self-administered questionnaire. The median knowledge score of the study population (n = 200) was 29, with majority (78.5%) having moderate knowledge (score 26-38). Only 2.5% of nurses had good AKI knowledge whereas 19.0% were found to have poor knowledge. Nurses' age, rank, and their departments had no significant impact on the knowledge scores. Furthermore, there was no significant difference of knowledge among participants who had previously attended any seminar/special training session regarding AKI and those who had not. In conclusion, majority of Pakistani nurses had moderate AKI knowledge. Therefore, in-service training sessions on AKI should be conducted to equip nurses with up-to-date AKI knowledge.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Paquistão , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...