RESUMO
We investigated whether the clinical criteria used in the Hestia study for selection of pulmonary embolism (PE) patients for outpatient treatment could discriminate PE patients with high and low risk for adverse clinical outcome. We performed a cohort study with PE patients who were triaged with 11 criteria for outpatient treatment. Patients not eligible for outpatient treatment were treated in hospital. Study outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and all-cause mortality during 3 months. In total, 530 patients were included, of which 297 were treated at home. In the outpatient group, six patients (2.0%, 95% CI 0.7-4.3%) had recurrent venous thromboembolism versus nine in-patients (3.9%, 95% CI 1.9-7.0%). Three patients (1.0%, 95% CI 0.2-2.9) died during the 3-months follow-up in the outpatient group versus 22 patients (9.6%, 95% CI 6.3-14) in the in-patient group (p<0.05). None of the outpatients died as a result of fatal PE versus five (2.2%) in-patients (p<0.05). In the outpatient group, 0.7% (95% CI 0.08-2.4) had major bleeding events versus 4.8% (95% CI 2.4-8.4) of in-patients (p<0.05). This study showed that the Hestia criteria can discriminate PE patients with low risk from patients with high risk for adverse clinical outcome. The low-risk patients can safely be treated at home.
Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/patologia , Pneumologia/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Pneumologia/métodos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/patologiaRESUMO
A 42-year-old man with large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma was admitted to hospital after eight chemotherapy cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP). He had high fever, non-productive cough, dyspnoea, and on chest X-ray, interstitial infiltrations. Extensive microbiological investigation excluded any infection, including opportunistic infection. Positron emission tomography (PET) scan was negative at previous lymphoma sites, but showed diffuse fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in both lungs. Pulmonary function testing demonstrated a restrictive pattern and a diffusion deficit. Review of the literature showed that this clinical picture closely corresponded with that of rituximab-induced interstitial pneumonitis. Treatment with prednisolone, 40 mg/day, resulted in a fast and complete recovery. Physicians administering rituximab should be aware of rituximab-induced interstitial pneumonitis, since according to recent literature this condition occurs in 9-14% of patients. It can run a mild course, but can also be fatal. Besides stopping rituximab, most patients need corticosteroid therapy.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/induzido quimicamente , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Testes de Função Respiratória , RituximabRESUMO
It is unknown whether strategies validated for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) are valid in patients with a history of PE. It was the objective of this study to investigate whether a diagnostic algorithm consisting of sequential application of a clinical decision rule (CDR), a quantitative D-dimer test and computed tomography (CT) safely ruled out a clinical suspicion of acute recurrent PE. Data were obtained from a diagnostic outcome study of patients suspected of PE. Acute recurrent PE was ruled out by an unlikely probability of PE (CDR score = 4 points) combined with a normal D-dimer test (= 500 ng/ml) or by a normal CT in all other patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute recurrent venous thromboembolism during three months of follow-up in patients with normal tests and not treated with anticoagulants. Of 3,306 patients suspected of acute PE, 259 patients (7.8%) had a history of PE of whom 234 were not treated with anticoagulants. The probability of PE was unlikely in 82 of 234 patients (35%), and 42 had a normal D-dimer test (18%), excluding recurrent PE. None of these patients had a thrombotic event during follow-up (0%, 95%CI: 0-6.9). A CT was indicated in all other patients (192) and ruled out recurrent PE in 127 patients (54%). Only one patient with a negative CT had a fatal recurrent PE during follow-up (0.8%; 95%CI: 0.02-4.3). In conclusion, this prospective study demonstrates the safety of ruling out a clinical suspicion of acute recurrent PE by a simple diagnostic algorithm in patients with a history of PE.