Risk stratification of patients with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure performed to stage the axillae, and axillary node clearance (ANC) or radiotherapy is the treatment for nodal involvement. The aims of this study were to assess (1) the role of preoperative axillary ultrasonography (US), (2) the number of positive lymph nodes on ANC after either positive SLNB results or preoperative ultrasonographically guided nodal biopsy, and (3) the role of ANC in patients with node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with invasive breast cancer and axillary node involvement (but clinically negative nodes on presentation) who underwent ANC between January 2008 and December 2009 were identified, and information regarding clinicopathologic parameters and the nodal yield was collected. ANC was performed for 3 groups: patients with micrometastasis seen in SLNB specimens, macrometastasis seen in SLNB specimens, and positive axillary nodes detected on US biopsy. RESULTS: ANC was performed 141 times over the 2-year period. Forty-two percent of axillary node involvement was diagnosed by biopsy or preoperative US, and 40% of these patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The remainder of cases were diagnosed by SLNB: 30% had micrometastases and 70% had macrometastases. Fifty percent of cancers with an ultrasonographic diagnosis of lymph node involvement were high grade and 56% had 4 or more positive nodes on ANC; this was significantly higher than in patients with positive SLNB results (P = .0001). Only 20% of patients with macrometastases on SLNB had 4 or more positive nodes in comparison with 56% with positive axillary lymph nodes by US (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The routine use of preoperative axillary US and biopsy of abnormal nodes helps in identifying high-risk patients and thus aids in planning treatment.

Is mode of presentation of B3 breast core biopsies (screen-detected or symptomatic) a distinguishing factor in the final histopathologic result or risk of diagnosis of malignancy?

BACKGROUND: The relation between histopathologic subclassification and mode of patient presentation (with a screen-detected vs. symptomatic lesion) with an abnormality in the breast core biopsy classified as having uncertain malignant potential (B3) has not been previously examined. We compared the histopathologic subclassification of these lesions and the frequency of malignancy in screen-detected and symptomatic patient groups. METHODS: All B3 core biopsies from one breast unit at the Royal Berkshire Hospital over a 5-year period (2006-2010) were analyzed (n = 131). After dividing the B3 biopsies into screen-detected and symptomatic groups, the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme histopathologic subclassification was used to further divide the groups into six subtypes. After surgery, a final diagnosis of invasive or in situ carcinoma was also noted. RESULTS: B3 classification comprised 3.8 % (131/3,440) of all core biopsies during that time period. There were 78 specimens from symptomatic (59 %) and 53 from screen-detected (41 %) patients. There was no statistically significant difference between papillary and fibroepithelial diagnoses between the two groups (47 vs. 42 %, p = 0.59, NS). There was no difference between the groups for atypia, lobular neoplasia, or sclerosing lesions (49 vs. 51 %, p = 0.8, NS). Cancer was found in 20 % of the symptomatic patients and in 17 % of the screen-detected group (p = 0.65, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Mode of patient presentation (with a screen-detected or symptomatic lesion) was not a distinguishing factor for breast histopathologic subclassification or for the final cancer diagnosis in patients whose breast core biopsy was classified as B3.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: an analysis of the maximum number of nodes requiring excision.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is now the standard of care in assessment of patients with clinically staged T1-2, N0 breast cancers. This study investigates whether there is a maximum number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) that need to be excised without compromising the false-negative (FN) rate of this procedure. Data were prospectively collected for 319 patients undergoing SNB between February 2001 and December 2006 at our institution. This data were analysed, both in terms of the order of SLN retrieval and relative isotope counts of the SLNs, in order to determine the maximum number of SLNs that need to be retrieved without increasing the FN rate. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between SLN blue dye concentration and the presence of SLN metastases. The SLN identification rate was 97% with no false-negative cases amongst patients undergoing simultaneous axillary clearance historically during technique validation. In patients with SLN metastases, excision of the first 4 SLNs encountered results in the identification of a metastatic SLN in all cases. Although the majority (86%) of SNB metastases are in the hottest node, the SLN containing the metastasis is in the first 4 hottest nodes in 99% of patients with nodal metastases. The remaining 1% of SLN metastases were identified by blue dye. There was no statistically significant association between the SLN blue dye concentration and the presence of SLN metastases. A policy to remove a maximum of four blue and/or hot SLNs along with any palpably abnormal lymph nodes does not result in an increased false-negative rate of detection of SLN metastases.