Efficacy of the pridie drilling technique in knee osteochondritis dissecans among children and young adults: follow-up of 41 cases.

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine whether Pridie drilling, a form of bone marrow stimulation, can expedite the healing process and enable a faster return to sports activity in patients with knee Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD). The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of Pridie drilling in stable OCD lesions that do not respond to non-operative treatment, by evaluating the absence of painful symptoms 6 months after the procedure. Secondary objectives include evaluating radiographic reconstruction 6 months post-surgery and determining the time it takes to resume sports participation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included all cases of stable OCD in the knee that underwent anterograde chondral drilling between 2008 and 2020. Diagnosis of OCD was established using knee radiographs, and the surgical technique involved multiple multidirectional subchondral drilling. Treatment efficacy was defined by the absence of painful symptoms for 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 41 knees were included in the study, and no complications were observed before or after surgery. At 6 months postoperatively, 32 knees (78%) showed complete resolution of symptoms. Complete radiographic reconstruction was observed in 66% of cases. Asymptomatic patients at 6 months returned to sports activity of similar intensity to that practiced previously in an average time of 7.9 months; while, patients who were symptomatic at 6 months returned in an average time of 16.5 months. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence supporting the short-term efficacy of anterograde chondral drilling in stable lesion of OCD in children and adolescents after failed functional treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (retrospective cohort study).

Long-term Natural History of Unrepaired Stable Ramp Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis of 28 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up of 20 Years.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus about whether stable ramp lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries need to be repaired. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how many stable ramp lesions left in situ during ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have subsequently failed after >20 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that ACL-reconstructed knees with ramp lesions left in situ without repair have a high risk of meniscal failure over the long term. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: All patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLR by a single experienced surgeon between January 1998 and December 2000 were evaluated retrospectively. Included were all cases of longitudinal tears in the meniscocapsular junction or the red zone of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus that were left in situ and identified through the anterior portals. Successful anterior probing confirmed a meniscal tear of the posterior segment. A lesion was considered stable if it was ≤2 cm and did not extend beyond the lower pole of the femoral condyle. The following data were collected preoperatively and at the last follow-up: demographics, time to surgery, side-to-side laxity, pivot shift, Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner activity scale, and meniscal failure rate. We defined 2 groups based on our findings: medial meniscal failure versus no medial meniscal failure. RESULTS: A total of 716 knees underwent primary ACLR during this period. The 39 (5.4%) stable unrepaired ramp lesions identified were included in the case series. Mean ± standard deviation follow-up was 262.1 ± 10.5 months. Eleven patients (28%) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining patients, 8 (28.6%) had a medial meniscal failure, of which 6 (21.4%) were bucket-handle tears. The average time elapsed before complications was 87.8 ± 52 months (range, 6-156 months). The medial meniscal survival rate was 93% at 5 years, 75% at 10 years, and 71% at 15 and 20 years. The failure event mainly happened between 96 and 120 months (8 and 10 years) after ACLR. No risk factors for failure were found, but some trends appeared, such as older age, higher body mass index, and preoperative rotational instability. All postoperative scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < .0001); 16 patients (57%) returned to their sport of choice. CONCLUSION: With nearly one-third of patients developing meniscal complications, including a large share of bucket-handle tears and mostly occurring 8 years after the ACLR, it may not be wise to leave stable ramp lesions unrepaired.