Risk factors for lymphoedema in women with breast cancer: A large prospective cohort.

A prospective study was conducted to identify women at increased risk for lymphoedema (LE) based on axillary surgery. Assessment occurred prior to surgery, within 4 weeks, and at 6, 12 and 18 months following surgery. Following post-surgery assessment, women were asked to complete weekly diaries regarding events that occurred in the previous week. Risk factors were grouped into demographic, lifestyle, breast cancer treatment-related, arm swelling-related, and post-surgical activities. Bioimpedance spectroscopy thresholds were used to determine presence of LE. At 18-months, 241 women with <5 nodes removed and 209 women with ≥5 nodes removed were assessed. For those with <5 nodes removed, LE was present in 3.3% compared with 18.2% for those with ≥5 nodes removed. There were insufficient events to identify risk factors for those with <5 nodes removed; for those with >5 nodes removed, independent risk factors included presence of arm swelling at 12-months (Odds Ratio (OR): 13.5, 95% CI 4.8, 38.1; P < 0.01), at 6-months (5.6 (2.0, 16.9); P < 0.01), and radiotherapy to the axilla (2.6 (0.7, 8.9); P = 0.14). Arm swelling at 6 and 12 months was associated with taxane-based chemotherapy, high body weight at diagnosis and arm swelling within 4 weeks post-surgery. Of the post-surgical events assessed in a sub-group of women with >5 nodes removed and who maintained weekly diaries, only blood drawn from the 'at-risk' arm was identified as a potential risk (OR 2.0; 0.8, 5.2). For women with ≥5 nodes removed, arm swelling in the first year poses a very strong risk for presence of LE at 18-months.

Complex sclerosing lesion: the lesion is complex, the management is straightforward.

BACKGROUND: Complex sclerosing lesion (CSL) and its smaller counterpart, the radial scar (RS), are frequently seen pathological entities. They are clinically asymptomatic and, prior to the implementation of mammographic screening, were most commonly found incidentally during pathological examination of other biopsied lesions. Complex sclerosing lesions are being detected regularly on mammograms due to widespread screening; many of their features resemble those of malignancy. Management varies and has been controversial. METHODS: Twenty-three cases of CSL detected during the first prevalent round of screening at BreastScreen Western Sydney (from February 1993 until June 1995) are presented and reviewed. Assessment was by a combination of radiological, clinical and cytological work-up prior to surgical biopsy. In addition, 126 spiculated carcinomas detected in the same period were reviewed and compared. RESULTS: Fourteen RS/CSL (62%) had lucent centres and nine (38%) had a central mass; three had been diagnosed provisionally as RS/CSL. Spicule lengths ranged from 25 to 90 mm; central masses ranged from 5 to 50 mm; and mass:spicule length ratio ranged from 1.2:1 to 1:10. Calcification (benign or indeterminate) was present in six cases (29%). No RS/CSL contained 'suspicious' calcifications, whereas 120 of 126 carcinomas (95%) had a central mass and six (5%) had a lucent centre (spicule lengths: 10-90 mm; central mass: 5-40 mm; and mass:spicule length ratio: 1.1:1-1:10). Twenty-one spiculated carcinomas (17%) contained microcalcifications (14 benign or indeterminate; seven suspicious). Provisional radiological diagnosis (PRD) after mammogram, with or without ultrasound, for histologically confirmed RS/CSL, was RS/CSL in 18 cases (78%), carcinoma in four cases (17%) and equivocal in one case (5%). For eight (6.5%) spiculate carcinomas the PRD was RS/CSL prior to histological diagnosis. The RS/CSL were detected with equal frequency in right and left breasts, and 22 (96%) lesions occurred in the upper breast. Seven RS/CSL (31%) and 83 spiculated carcinomas (65%) had been described as 'palpable' but most were subtle. Twelve fine-needle aspiration biopsies were performed (six 'palpable' lesions (no radiological guidance); four with ultrasound guidance and two with stereotactic guidance), and five (62.5%) of eight adequate lesions were reported as benign, two (25%) were reported as atypical, and one (12.5%) was reported as suspicious. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive mammographic and sonographic differentiation of RS/CSL and stellate-type carcinoma is impossible. For screen-detected lesions that may be RS/CSL, the appropriate surgical procedure is a small but adequate biopsy using guidewire or other localization methods with optimal cosmetic incision.

Breast carcinoma in a fibroadenoma: diagnosis by fine needle aspiration cytology.

We describe a case of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) occurring in a fibroadenoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. The cytological features comprised a small population of pleomorphic cells admixed with a dominant population of bland epithelial cells showing features consistent with those of a fibroadenoma. Excision biopsy confirmed the presence of DCIS within an otherwise typical fibroadenoma. Recent reviews have emphasised the potential for fibroadenoma to cytologically mimic carcinoma, leading to false positive findings, however the converse is also possible. We conclude that a false negative cytological diagnosis may be avoided by recommending histological confirmation by excision biopsy when significant atypia is present, even if the overall pattern is that of a fibroadenoma.

Is there a role for fine-needle aspiration in radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast?

The fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA) from 12 mammographically detected, histologically confirmed radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions (RS/CSL) and their corresponding mammography were reviewed. Six aspirates were obtained by palpation, four by ultrasound guidance, and two by stereotactic guidance. Of the eight lesions with sufficient material five (62.5%) were reported as benign, two (25%) as atypical, and one (12.5%) as suspicious. It is proposed that FNA for RS/CSL should not be performed, and lesions require excision for histologic assessment.