Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Palliat Med ; 27(7): 912-915, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973547

RESUMO

Objective: Our medical center implemented a multidisciplinary team to improve surgical decision making for high-risk older adults. To make this a patient-centric process, a pilot program included the patient and their family/caregiver(s) in these conversations. Our hypothesis is that multidisciplinary team discussions can improve difficult surgical decision making. Methods: From January to June 2022, we offered patients and their family participation in multidisciplinary discussions at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Semistructured interviews were conducted 1-6 days after the meeting. Interview transcripts were analyzed with qualitative mixed-methods approach. Results: Six patients and caregivers participated in the interviews. They found the discussion helpful for improving their understanding of the surgical decision. Out of these, 50% (3 of 6) of the patients changed their decision regarding the planned operation based on the discussion. Conclusion: Including patients and caregiver(s) in multidisciplinary surgical decision-making discussions resulted in half of the patients changing their surgical plans. This pilot study demonstrated both acceptance and feasibility for all participants.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Participação do Paciente , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidadores/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Estados Unidos
2.
J Palliat Med ; 24(12): 1863-1866, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851187

RESUMO

Background: Surgeons must evaluate and communicate the risk associated with operative procedures for patients at high risk of poor postoperative outcomes. Multidisciplinary approaches to complex decision making are needed. Objective: To improve physician decision making for high-risk surgical patients. Design: This is a retrospective review of patients presented to a multidisciplinary committee for three years. Setting/Subjects: Evaluation of patients was done in a single-center U.S. veterans affairs (VA) hospital. All patients who were considered for surgery had a VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) risk calculator 30-day mortality >5%. Measurements: Thirty-day and one-year mortality were measured. Results: Seventy-six patients were reviewed with an average expected 30-day mortality of 14.2%. Forty-two patients (57%) had a recommended change in the care plan before surgery. Fifty-four patients (71%) proceeded with surgery and experienced a 30-day mortality of 7.4%. Conclusions and Relevance: Multidisciplinary discussion of high-risk surgical patients may help surgeons make perioperative recommendations for patients. Implementation of a multidisciplinary high-risk committee should be considered at facilities that manage high-risk surgical patients.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória , Médicos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Médicos/psicologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...